Televisi dan Dinamika Politik (Opini Pemerhati Talk Show Obrolan Karebosi Pasca Pilkada Serentak 2015 di Sulawesi Selatan)

The mass media have a responsibility in democratization, through the fulfillment of political education to the community. This study aims to determine (1) the opinions of observer of Talk Show Obrolan Karebosi about this tv program Post-Unison Election at 2015 in South Sulawesi (2) how the process of formation of observers opinion on the talk show Obrolan Karebosi. This study uses a qualitative approach with a basic theory research to lead to the discovery or strengthen a theory. The research was conducted in Makassar with several informants who are Celebes TV viewers. The types and sources of data used are primary and secondary data. The primary data or main data in the form of interviews with informants, secondary data or supporting documents such as books, thesis, journals, articles and internet. Informants consisted of five Celebes TV viewers who've joined in Obrolan Karebosi program that discussed about simultaneous elections in 2015 in South Sulawesi and hereinafter referred to as observer of Obrolan Karebosi. Data were collected in the form of interviews with informants. Data were analyzed using several theories. The results showed that (1) observer of Obrolan Karebosi give a positive opinion for the hosts, theme, and the event speakers, while speakers from among politicians and organizers of the elections, observers showed a negative opinion in terms of the balance, suitability, mastery of the material and honesty. (2) Opinion observer of Obrolan Karebosi shaped by their attitude to the program, thir trust as well as their perception that formed on the Obrolan Karebosi. Media massa memiliki tanggungjawab dalam demokratisasi, melalui pemenuhan pendidikan politik ke masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui (1) opini pemerhati Talk Show Obrolan Karebosi Pasca Pilkada Serentak 2015 di Sulawesi Selatan (2) bagaimana proses terbentuknya opini pemerhati terhadap talk show Obrolan Karebosi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian teori dasar untuk mengarahkan pada penemuan atau menguatkan suatu teori. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di kota Makassar dengan beberapa informan yang merupakan pemirsa Celebes TV. Jenis dan sumber data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder. Data primer atau data utama berupa hasil wawancara dengan informan, dan data sekunder atau data pendukung berupa buku, tesis, jurnal, artikel dan internet. Informan terdiri atas lima orang pemirsa Celebes TV yang pernah bergabung di program Obrolan Karebosi pada pembahasan Pilkada serentak 2015 di Sulawesi Selatan dan selanjutnya disebut sebagai pemerhati Obrolan Karebosi. Data dikumpulkan berupa hasil wawancara dengan para informan. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan beberapa teori. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pemerhati Obrolan Karebosi memberikan opini positif terhadap host, tema dan narasumber acara tersebut, sedangkan untuk narasumber dari kalangan politisi dan penyelenggara Pilkada, pemerhati menunjukkan opini negatif ditinjau dari keberimbangan, kesesuaian, penguasaan materi dan kejujuran. (2) Opini pemerhati Obrolan Karebosi dibentuk oleh sikap mereka terhadap program, kepercayaan serta persepsi mereka yang terbentuk tentang Obrolan Karebosi

Penerimaan Informasi Dampak Penambangan Pasir Bagi Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup di Kalangan Penambang Pasir Ilegal di DAS Jeneberang Kabupaten Gowa

Illegal mining has been disturbing residents, its consequences such as damage to buildings , damage to land and as well as the threat of landslides . This study aims to determine how the process of receiving information in the sand miners on the impact of mining activities on the environment in the watershed Jeneberang Gowa . The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative , observation and interviews with respondents directly to key informants consisting of 6 -party BLHD Gowa and 2 representatives of the illegal miners who are still active and is no longer active . Selects respondents intentionally ( purposive ) with predetermined criteria . Data were analyzed based on the Elaboration Likelihood Theory of Richard Petty and John T. Cacioppo . Based on the research results , admission information among miners became a boomerang attributed to the weak argument given the BLHD . Weak arguments given to the audience with high motivation in elaborating the message will turn on the rejection message is given so persuasive attitude change is difficult to achieve . This study suggests that the delivery of information about environmental damage through persuasive message carried Regional Environmental Agency to the miners do not achieve the goal of changing the behavior of the miners to stop illegal mining and the need to take into account the credibility of the communicator and the audience trust the communicator, as well as strength message in the process of providing information

Audit Komunikasi terhadap Program Sosialisasi Pembangunan T/l 150 Kv Maros-sungguminasa PT. Pln (Persero) Pikitring Sulmapa

This study aims to audit the development socialization process of T/L 150 kV Maros – Sungguminasa PT. PLN (Persero) Pikitring Sulmapa, and to audit the constraint in development socialization process of T/L 150 kV Maros – Sungguminasa PT. PLN (Persero) Pikitring Sulmapa from socialization team to government, land owner, and communities affected by development of T/L 150 kV Maros – Sungguminasa PT. PLN (Persero) Pikitring Sulmapa. This study was case study with communication audit approach. The method of data collecting used was interview, questionnaire, and document study. The data were analyzed by technique developed by International Communication Association (ICA), namely the analysis of communication experience, also known as critical incident technique. The results of this study shows that the development socialization process of T/L 150 kV Maros – Sungguminasa PT. PLN (Persero) Pikitring Sulmapa delivered directly by Socialization Team to land owner, communities affected and government through two different media or channel. The type of evaluation is done by Socialization Team is very simple, if there is a feedback from the communities, and they accept the socialization team consider the socialization has been successfully implemented. The constraint are becoming findings of researcher in the development socialization program of T/L 150 kV Maros – Sungguminasa PT. PLN (Persero) Pikitring Sulmapa is the language constraint caused by the limited local knowledge which is owned by Socialization Team. The constraint in simplifying the message occurs because the Socialization Team is trying to suppress the confusion level that might be experienced by land owner communities, affected communities and relevant government (Head of Environment) so feel the need to adjust the portion of way of thinking by considering the education background. The other constraint found by researcher related to the socialization process were prejudice, removing of message and the constraint experienced based its nature is subjectivity

Pendapat Politisi terhadap Kredibilitas Lembaga Survei Tentang Elektabilitasnya dalam Pemilihan Legislatif Dprd Sulsel 2014

The presence of survey's institute hold a strategic role for a politicians as well as for the political party in every political moments, but the main requirement for a survey institute to maintain the public trust in them is their credibility. This study aims to find out politicians' opinions and factors influencing their opinions about the credibility of survey institutions in relation with electability in the election of legislative representatives in South Sulawesi Parliament in 2014. This descriptive qualitative research involved twelve politicians from different parties and four survey institution officials as informants. They were selected purposively. The data were collected through interviews and observations; and were analysed by using the interaction analysis model developed by Milles and Huberman. The data were processed through three channels of qualitative data analysis: reducing the data, presenting the data, and drawing the conclusion. The results reveal that politicians tend to trust the credibility of survey institutions and the results of electability survey released by the institutions. This is influenced by internal and external factors. Internally, the politicians are influenced by their experience and education. Externally, they are influenced by party traditions and the credibility of survey institutions. Furthermore, according to the politicians. There are five criteria for credibility of a survey institutions, including track record of the institution, track record of the institution's leader, proffesionality of human resources, positive image, and clear addres of office. Survey institutions maintain their relationship with politicians through emotional approach and professional approach. It is expected for the survey institutions to formulate a relevant method of survey for every existing political dynamis, such as for the money politics phenomena in the recent local elections. As for the politicians them selves, they have to be more selective and based on the ideal standard in utilizing the survey institutions