Coronary artery disease in asymptomatic type-2 diabetic women: a comparative study between exercise test, cardiopulmonary exercise test, and dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the identification of ischemia

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among diabetic individuals. Myocardial ischemia is frequently asymptomatic, thus leading to a late diagnosis and worse prognosis. Diabetic women are known to have a cardiovascular death risk higher than that in men. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic diabetic women. To compare the results of exercise test (ET), cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) with the findings of coronary angiography, (ANGI) in order of identify the most accurate method in the detection of significant CAD. METHODS: A total of 104 diabetic women were assessed with ET, CPET and MPS in the period within two months from the ANGI. MIBI-99mTc scintigraphy was performed using the gated-SPECT technique. Pearson's chi-square, Student's t tests were used for the statistical analysis and also the logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of CAD in the group studied was 32.7%. For the ET, an effective test (p=0.045), the chronotropic incompetence (p=0.031), and the exercise time performed (p=0.022) showed a significant association with DAC. For CPET, peak VO2 and HR achieved were associated with CAD (p=0.004 and p=0.025, respectively). Most of the MPS variables showed a significant association with CAD (p=0.001, for all). CONCLUSION: The results obtained may suggest a high prevalence of CAD in diabetic women. Thus, this population should be investigated from the cardiovascular point of view even without cardiac symptom. Of the noninvasive diagnostic methods used, dipyridamole MPS was the one that showed the highest discrimination power in relation to diabetic women with CAD.FUNDAMENTO: A doença cardiovascular é a principal causa de morbi-mortalidade nos diabéticos. A isquemia do miocárdio é freqüentemente assintomática levando ao diagnóstico tardio e pior prognóstico. Sabe-se que a mulher diabética tem risco de morte cardiovascular maior em relação ao sexo masculino. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a prevalência de doença arterial coronariana (DAC) em diabéticas assintomáticas. Comparar os resultados do teste ergométrico (TE), do teste cardiopulmonar (TCP) e da cintilografia do miocárdio sob estímulo farmacológico com dipiridamol (CM) com os achados da cinecoronariografia (CINE) verificando o método de maior acurácia na identificação de DAC significativa. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliadas 104 diabéticas que realizaram TE, TCP e CM no período de dois meses da CINE. As cintilografias com MIBI-99mTc foram realizadas pela técnica de gated-SPECT. A análise estatística foi realizada pelos testes x² de Pearson e t de Student, sendo realizada, ainda, análise de regressão logística. RESULTADOS: A prevalência de DAC no grupo estudado foi de 32,7%. No TE, o teste eficaz (p=0,045), a incompetência cronotrópica (p=0,031) e o tempo de esforço realizado (p=0,022) apresentaram associação significativa com DAC. No TCP, o VO2pico e a FC atingida apresentaram associação com DAC (p=0,004 e p=0,025). A maioria das variáveis da CM mostrou importante associação com DAC (todas com p=0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados obtidos sugerem elevada prevalência de DAC em pacientes diabéticas assintomáticas, devendo ser essa uma população investigada do ponto de vista cardiovascular. Dos métodos diagnósticos não-invasivos que foram empregados, o que mostrou ter maior poder de discriminação em relação às portadoras de DAC foi a CM com dipiridamol.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Instituto Dante Pazzanese de CardiologiaUNIFESP, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de CardiologiaSciEL

Exercise may cause myocardial ischemia at the anaerobic threshold in cardiac rehabilitation programs

Myocardial ischemia may occur during an exercise session in cardiac rehabilitation programs. However, it has not been established whether it is elicited when exercise prescription is based on heart rate corresponding to the anaerobic threshold as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Our objective was to determine the incidence of myocardial ischemia in cardiac rehabilitation programs according to myocardial perfusion SPECT in exercise programs based on the anaerobic threshold. Thirty-nine patients (35 men and 4 women) diagnosed with coronary artery disease by coronary angiography and stress technetium-99m-sestamibi gated SPECT associated with a baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test were assessed. Ages ranged from 45 to 75 years. A second cardiopulmonary exercise test determined training intensity at the anaerobic threshold. Repeat gated-SPECT was obtained after a third cardiopulmonary exercise test at the prescribed workload and heart rate. Myocardial perfusion images were analyzed using a score system of 6.4 at rest, 13.9 at peak stress, and 10.7 during the prescribed exercise (P < 0.05). The presence of myocardial ischemia during exercise was defined as a difference ≥2 between the summed stress score and summed rest score. Accordingly, 25 (64%) patients were classified as ischemic and 14 (36%) as nonischemic. MIBI-SPECT showed myocardial ischemia during exercise within the anaerobic threshold. The 64% prevalence of ischemia observed in the study should not be looked on as representative of the whole population of patients undergoing exercise programs. Changes in patient care and exercise programs were implemented as a result of our finding of ischemia during the prescribed exercise.Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Serviço de Reabilitação CardiovascularInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Seção Médica de Medicina NuclearInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Departamento de SaúdeUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Departamento de CardiologiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Departamento de MedicinaUNIFESP, EPM, Depto. de CardiologiaUNIFESP, EPM, Depto. de MedicinaSciEL

Noninvasive assessment of patients undergoing percutaneous intervention in myocardial infarction

FUNDAMENTO: A reestenose pós-intervenção coronariana percutânea primária permanece um problema de relevância clínica, mesmo com o implante de stents. A capacidade das provas não invasivas para detecção de reestenose não foi totalmente demonstrada. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a habilidade do teste ergométrico (TE) e da cintilografia de perfusão miocárdica (CPM) no diagnóstico de reestenose em pacientes com infarto agudo do miocárdio, e supradenivelamento do segmento ST, submetidos à angioplastia coronariana percutânea primária (ACPP), com implante de stent nas primeiras 12 horas de evolução. MÉTODOS: De Ago/2003-Jan/2006, foram selecionados 64 pacientes (ps) (56,2 ± 10,2 anos, 53 homens) submetidos à ACPP. Apenas ps com fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo > 40,0%, definida por ecocardiograma de repouso, foram incluídos. Teste ergométrico, com as 12 derivações do ECG associadas a precordiais direitas, e CPM foram realizados 6 semanas, 6 meses e um ano após o tratamento. Foi realizada cinecoronariografia no 6º mês. RESULTADOS: Doença uniarterial ocorreu em 46,9% dos ps, sendo a artéria descendente anterior tratada em 48,4%. Reestenose angiográfica ocorreu em 28,8%. Sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo (VPP), valor preditivo negativo (VPN) e acurácia do TE para detecção de reestenose não foram significativos. A adição de derivações precordiais direitas não proporcionou informações adicionais. Sensibilidade, especificidade, VPP, VPN e acurácia da CPM apresentaram correlação com reestenose apenas no 6º mês, considerando-se summed difference score > 2 (p = 0,006) e > 4 (p = 0,014). CONCLUSÃO: O TE não discriminou reestenose. A CPM realizada no 6º mês foi relacionada à reestenose e mostrou-se útil durante a evolução.BACKGROUND: Restenosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains an important clinical problem, even with stent implantation. The ability of noninvasive testing to diagnose restenosis has had only inconsistent demonstration. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the ability of exercise treadmill testing (ETT) and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to diagnose restenosis in patients treated by PPCI within 12 hours of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: From August 2003 to January 2006, 64 patients (mean age of 56.2±10.2 years, 53 males) were enrolled after PPCI. Only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%, as assessed by resting transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), were included. ETT with 12-lead ECG monitoring and right precordial leads, as also MPI were performed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and one year after intervention. Coronary angiography was performed at six months. RESULTS: Single-vessel disease was observed in 46.9% of the patients. The left anterior descending coronary artery was treated in 48.4% of the patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 28.8%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of ETT in detecting restenosis were not significant. Right precordial leads did not add information. MPI sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy correlated with restenosis only in the 6-month follow-up, both when considering summed difference score >2 (p=0.006) and >4 (p=0.014). CONCLUSION: ETT did not discriminate restenosis in this population. MPI performed at 6 months correlated with restenosis and proved useful during follow-up

International Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis of Heart Disease

BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has adversely affected diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases. Its effects on delivery of diagnostic care for cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of death worldwide, have not been quantified.OBJECTIVES The study sought to assess COVID-19`s impact on global cardiovascular diagnostic procedural volumes and safety practices.METHODS The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey assessing alterations in cardiovascular procedure volumes and safety practices resulting from COVID-19. Noninvasive and invasive cardiac testing volumes were obtained from participating sites for March and April 2020 and compared with those from March 2019. Availability of personal protective equipment and pandemic-related testing practice changes were ascertained.RESULTS Surveys were submitted from 909 inpatient and outpatient centers performing cardiac diagnostic procedures, in 108 countries. Procedure volumes decreased 42% from March 2019 to March 2020, and 64% from March 2019 to April 2020. Transthoradc echocardiography decreased by 59%, transesophageat echocardiography 76%, and stress tests 78%, which varied between stress modalities. Coronary angiography (invasive or computed tomography) decreased 55% (p &lt; 0.001 for each procedure). hi multivariable regression, significantly greater reduction in procedures occurred for centers in countries with lower gross domestic product. Location in a low-income and lower-middle-income country was associated with an additional 22% reduction in cardiac procedures and less availability of personal protective equipment and teteheatth.CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 was associated with a significant and abrupt reduction in cardiovascular diagnostic testing across the globe, especially affecting the world's economically challenged. Further study of cardiovascular outcomes and COVID-19-related changes in care delivery is warranted. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Sex Differences in Revascularization, Treatment Goals, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial

Background: Women with chronic coronary disease are generally older than men and have more comorbidities but less atherosclerosis. We explored sex differences in revascularization, guideline-directed medical therapy, and outcomes among patients with chronic coronary disease with ischemia on stress testing, with and without invasive management. Methods and results: The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial randomized patients with moderate or severe ischemia to invasive management with angiography, revascularization, and guideline-directed medical therapy, or initial conservative management with guideline-directed medical therapy alone. We evaluated the primary outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) and other end points, by sex, in 1168 (22.6%) women and 4011 (77.4%) men. Invasive group catheterization rates were similar, with less revascularization among women (73.4% of invasive-assigned women revascularized versus 81.2% of invasive-assigned men; P<0.001). Women had less coronary artery disease: multivessel in 60.0% of invasive-assigned women and 74.8% of invasive-assigned men, and no ≥50% stenosis in 12.3% versus 4.5% (P<0.001). In the conservative group, 4-year catheterization rates were 26.3% of women versus 25.6% of men (P=0.72). Guideline-directed medical therapy use was lower among women with fewer risk factor goals attained. There were no sex differences in the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for women versus men, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77-1.13]; P=0.47) or the major secondary outcome of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.14]; P=0.49), with no significant sex-by-treatment-group interactions. Conclusions: Women had less extensive coronary artery disease and, therefore, lower revascularization rates in the invasive group. Despite lower risk factor goal attainment, women with chronic coronary disease experienced similar risk-adjusted outcomes to men in the ISCHEMIA trial. Registration: URL: http://wwwclinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01471522

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection