4 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Surgical management of a lateral sphenoid sinus encephalocele: 2-Dimensional operative video.
Encephaloceles are considered rare with an approximate incidence of 1 in 35,000, and sphenoid encephaloceles are even more uncommon.2 Two types of sphenoid encephaloceles exist: medial perisellar encephaloceles, and lateral sphenoidal encephaloceles. Surgical correction of the lateral sphenoid recess encephalocele is achieved via one of two endoscopic approaches: extended sphenoidotomy or transpterygopalatine. Extended sphenoidotomy is preferred if the angle between the access door and lateral extension of bone defect is greater than 35°1. Otherwise, the transpterygopalatine approach is used. Intraoperative video demonstrating an extended sphenoidotomy approach to correcting a lateral recess sphenoidal encephalocele has not previously been published. Here we present a case of a 41-year-old female who presented with meningitis, a cerebrospinal fluid leak, and an incidental sphenoid mass. Brain MRI redemonstrated the mass in the sphenoid sinus consistent with an encephalocele occupying Sternbergs Canal. The patient consented to the procedure. The video demonstrates the skull base approach, encephalocele extraction, collagen inlay, and nasal septal bone and vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap placement. Postoperative imaging confirmed the placement of the collagen inlay and nasal septal bone autograft. The patient recovered from surgery and was discharged on post-operative day 3 with no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak recurrence. Postoperative follow up demonstrated viable nasoseptal graft without evidence of CSF leak. For patients with favorable anatomy, an extended sphenoidotomy approach to lateral sphenoid sinus encephalocele resection is a preferred alternative to the transpterygoid approach. This surgical video demonstrates the technique for managing lateral sphenoid sinus encephaloceles occupying Sternbergs canal, including endonasal approach, encephalocele resection and posterior sphenoid wall repair
Recommended from our members
Enlarging symptomatic arachnoid cyst in an elderly patient: illustrative case.
BACKGROUND: Arachnoid cysts are congenital or acquired structures found within the brain and are rarely symptomatic for adults. The literature documenting enlarging arachnoid cysts in adults is also discussed. OBSERVATIONS: An elderly woman presented with acutely worsening headaches, photophobia, cognitive function, and a seizure-like episode. The patient had a known arachnoid cyst with a decade of radiographic stability, which was now idiopathically enlarging. The patient had a previous history of traumatic brain injuries but no reported trauma around the time of presentation. Due to the severity of midline shift and symptomatology, the decision was made to treat the patient surgically with fenestration and shunting. She recovered well postoperatively. LESSONS: During the workup for a symptomatic elderly patient, enlargement of a previously asymptomatic arachnoid cyst should remain on the differential until specifically ruled out, even in the absence of recent trauma. While rare, enlarging arachnoid cysts result in neurological findings and impact the quality of life for patients
Recommended from our members
Reducing frame rate and pulse rate for routine diagnostic cerebral angiography: ALARA principles in practice.
OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic cerebral angiograms (DCAs) are widely used in neurosurgery due to their high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose and characterize pathology using ionizing radiation. Eliminating unnecessary radiation is critical to reduce risk to patients, providers, and health care staff. We investigated if reducing pulse and frame rates during routine DCAs would decrease radiation burden without compromising image quality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively acquired data after implementing a quality improvement protocol in which pulse rate and frame rate were reduced from 15 p/s to 7.5 p/s and 7.5 f/s to 4.0 f/s respectively. Radiation doses and exposures were calculated. Two endovascular neurosurgeons reviewed randomly selected angiograms of both doses and blindly assessed their quality. RESULTS: A total of 40 consecutive angiograms were retrospectively analyzed, 20 prior to the protocol change and 20 after. After the intervention, radiation dose, radiation per run, total exposure, and exposure per run were all significantly decreased even after adjustment for BMI (all p<0.05). On multivariable analysis, we identified a 46% decrease in total radiation dose and 39% decrease in exposure without compromising image quality or procedure time. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that for routine DCAs, pulse rate of 7.5 with a frame rate of 4.0 is sufficient to obtain diagnostic information without compromising image quality or elongating procedure time. In the interest of patient, provider, and health care staff safety, we strongly encourage all interventionalists to be cognizant of radiation usage to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and consequential health risks