Additional file 1 of Prospective associations between changes in physical activity and sedentary time and subsequent lean muscle mass in older English adults: the EPIC-Norfolk cohort study

Additional file 1: Table S1. Participant characteristics for those included versus excluded

Primary outcome analysis: Physical activity, diet, and medication use.

Forest plots are presented for meta-analyses summing the effects of contributing studies for each outcome. In each forest plot, effect estimates from individual studies are illustrated with a box and the 95% CIs with lines (whiskers). The overall effect is indicated by the diamond below, with its width representing the 95% CIs (any overlap of the central line of no effect indicates no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups). CI, confidence interval; IV, inverse variance; SE, standard error.</p

Supplementary Table 1c from Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Details of development of models from cross-sectional studies.</p

PRISMA checklist.

PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. (DOCX)</p

PRISMA flow diagram of identification and selection of studies.

CENTRAL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.</p

Primary outcome analysis: Smoking and skin self-examination.

Forest plots are presented for meta-analyses summing the effects of contributing studies for each outcome. In each forest plot, effect estimates from individual studies are illustrated with a box and the 95% CIs with lines (whiskers). The overall effect is indicated by the diamond below, with its width representing the 95% CIs (any overlap of the central line of no effect indicates no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups). CI, confidence interval; IV, inverse variance.</p

Supplementary Table 2 from Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Methods for validation studies.</p

Supplementary file 1 from Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Search Strategies.</p

Secondary outcome analysis (outcomes with nonstandard scales): Oral health, anxiety, depression, and stress.

Forest plots are presented for meta-analyses summing the effects of contributing studies for each outcome. In each forest plot, effect estimates from individual studies are illustrated with a box and the 95% CIs with lines (whiskers). The overall effect is indicated by the diamond below, with its width representing the 95% CIs (any overlap of the central line of no effect indicates no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups). CI, confidence interval; IV, inverse variance; SD, standard deviation.</p

Secondary outcome analysis (outcomes with standard scales): Framingham risk score, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, BMI, waist circumference, and skin darkening.

Forest plots are presented for meta-analyses summing the effects of contributing studies for each outcome. In each forest plot, effect estimates from individual studies are illustrated with a box and the 95% CIs with lines (whiskers). The overall effect is indicated by the diamond below, with its width representing the 95% CIs (any overlap of the central line of no effect indicates no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups). BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; IV, inverse variance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SD, standard deviation; UV, ultraviolet.</p