7 research outputs found
The fixed-effect model forest plot graph shows PPI+ acellular scaffolds subgroup (subgroup2) is significantly higher than the ICI subgroup (subgroup1) in the restoring of nNOS expression, (p = 0.046).
<p>The fixed-effect model forest plot graph shows PPI+ acellular scaffolds subgroup (subgroup2) is significantly higher than the ICI subgroup (subgroup1) in the restoring of nNOS expression, (p = 0.046).</p
The fixed-effect model forest plot graph shows there is no significant difference between different delivery approach of ICI (subgroup1), PPI+ acellular scaffolds (subgroup2) or PPI+ acellular scaffolds+BDNF (subgroup3) in the a-SMA expression; the NGF, BDNF+ udenafil, BDNF+ bFGF subgroup(subgroup4) can restore the a-SMA expression more effectively than the other subgroups (subgroup 1 vs. subgroup 4 p = 0.029; subgroup 2 vs. subgroup 4 p = 0.026; subgroup 3 vs. subgroup 4 p = 0.023).
<p>The fixed-effect model forest plot graph shows there is no significant difference between different delivery approach of ICI (subgroup1), PPI+ acellular scaffolds (subgroup2) or PPI+ acellular scaffolds+BDNF (subgroup3) in the a-SMA expression; the NGF, BDNF+ udenafil, BDNF+ bFGF subgroup(subgroup4) can restore the a-SMA expression more effectively than the other subgroups (subgroup 1 vs. subgroup 4 p = 0.029; subgroup 2 vs. subgroup 4 p = 0.026; subgroup 3 vs. subgroup 4 p = 0.023).</p
The fixed-effect model forest plot graphs show the uncultured stem cells (BMMNCs and SVF) are significantly less effective than cultured stem cells(4a), while there is no significant difference among the following subgroups: CNI models(4b), following time(4c), stem cells species(4d), cell sources(4e), labels(4f) and delivered approaches(4g).
<p>Fig 4a: cultured stem cells (subgroup1) vs. uncultured stem cells; (subgroup 2), p = 0.011. Fig 4b: cavernous nerve continuous (subgroup1) vs. cavernous nerve discontinuous (subgroup2). Fig 4C: Follow-up time: one month (subgroup1) vs. three months (subgroup2). Fig 4d: autotransplantation (subgroup1) vs. allotransplantation (subgroup2) vs. heterotransplantation (subgroup3). Fig 4e: ADSCs (subgroup1) vs. BMSCs (subgroup2) vs. TDSCs (subgroup3). Fig 4f: nuclear labelling (subgroup1) vs. lipid-soluble markers (subgroup2). Fig 4g: ICI (subgroup1) vs. PPI (subgroup2) vs. PPI + acellular scaffolds (subgroup3).</p
Characteristics of the articles published.
<p>NESCs:neural embryonic stem cells; SkMSCs:skeletal muscle-derived stem cells; BMMNCs:bone marrow mononucleated cells;ADSCs:adipose tissue-derived stem cells; BMSCs:bone marrow stem Cells; SVF:adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction; TDSCs:testis-derived stem cells; BMCD133<sup>+</sup>:Bone Marrow Derived CD133<sup>+</sup> Cells.</p><p>Characteristics of the articles published.</p
Fluorine Doping Strengthens the Lithium-Storage Properties of the Mn-Based Metal–Organic Framework
The
electrochemical properties of the metal–organic framework (MOF)-based
composite as electrode material can be significantly improved by means
of partial destruction of the full coordination of linkers to metal
ions and replacing with other small ions, which make metal centers
become more accostable and consequently more effective for the lithiation/delithiation
process. In this paper, F<sup>–</sup> was chosen to replace
some of the benzenedicarboxylate (BDC) linkers because of its better
interaction with the Li<sup>+</sup> than the oxide ion. What’s
more, the formed M–F bond promotes the Li<sup>+</sup> to transfer
at the active material interface and protects the surface from HF
attacking. The as-synthesized F-doped Mn-MOF electrode maintains a
reversible capacity of 927 mA h g<sup>–1</sup> with capacity
retention of 78.5% after 100 cycles at 100 mA g<sup>–1</sup> and also exhibits a high discharge capacity of 716 mA h g<sup>–1</sup> at 300 mA g<sup>–1</sup> and 620 mA h g<sup>–1</sup> at 500 mA g<sup>–1</sup> after 500 cycles. Even at 1000 mA
g<sup>–1</sup>, the electrode still maintains a high reversible
capacity of 494 mA h g<sup>–1</sup> after 500 cycles as well
as a Coulombic efficiency of nearly 100%, which is drastically increased
compared with pure Mn-MOF material as expected