University Hospital Of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust

Response to our Freedom of Information Act request received from this NHS Trust

West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Response to our Freedom of Information Act request received from this NHS Trust

Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Response to our Freedom of Information Act request received from this NHS Trust

Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust

Response to our Freedom of Information Act request received from this NHS Trust

Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital NHS Trust

Response to our Freedom of Information Act request received from this NHS Trust

Protocol for a Randomised controlled trial of structured Educational sessions to Clinical Commissioning Groups and Assessing the impact on primary care Prescribing

Protocol for an agile evaluation of an NHS England intervention, based upon primary care prescribing data available at OpenPrescribing.net. Full author list contained within

Trends and variation in Prescribing of Low-Priority Medicines Identified by NHS England: A Cross-Sectional Study and Interactive Data Tool in English Primary Care

Data and analytic code from the above entitled paper. Most of the data are sorted and directly queried from Google Bigquery, which we plan to make publicly available at some point in the future

The effect of Audit & Feedback on prescribing of nimodipine in primary care and engagement with data on OpenPrescribing.net - A Cohort Study

Protocol for a cohort study of NHS primary care practices, as part of our programme of work on “audit and feedback” using our OpenPrescribing.net tools

RetractoBot: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of notifying authors that they have cited a retracted paper [Registered Report Stage 1 Protocol]

Background: There is a problem with the visibility of retractions, and many retracted papers continue to be cited as if they were still valid. It has been suggested that authors citing retracted papers should be contacted about it, but this has been deemed too challenging and has never been attempted.Design: This is a randomised controlled trial.Methods: All eligible retracted papers will be randomised either to the intervention (an email notifying authors of the citing papers about the fact that they have cited a retracted publication) or the control group (no notification email).Outcomes: The primary outcome will be the rate of citation of retracted papers during 12 months follow-up. The secondary outcomes will be a 24-month follow-up and the qualitative analysis of feedback from the authors in response to the intervention email.Conclusions: Our trial will investigate whether the number of citations of retracted papers can be reduced by notifying researchers that they cited a retracted paper.<br

RetractoBot: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of notifying authors that they have cited a retracted paper

This is description of an software tool notifying authors that they cited a retracted paper and a protocol for a proposed randomised trial investigating the impact of notifying authors that they have cited a retracted paper