Some Observations on the Performance of the Most Recent Exchange-Correlation Functionals for the Large and Chemically Diverse GMTKN55 Benchmark

Benchmarks that span a broad swath of chemical space, such as GMTKN55, are very useful for assessing progress in the quest for more universal DFT functionals. We find that the WTMAD2 metrics for a great number of functionals show a clear "Jacob's Ladder hierarchy"; that the "combinatorial" development strategy of Head-Gordon and coworkers generates "best on rung" performers; that the quality of the nonlocal dispersion correction becomes more important as functionals become more accurate for nondispersion properties; that fitting against small, unrepresentative benchmark sets leads to underperforming functionals; and that {\omega}B97M(2) is currently the best DFT functional of any kind, but that revDSD-D4 functionals are able to reach similar performance using fewer parameters, and that revDOD-D4 in addition permits reduced-scaling algorithms. If one seeks a range-separated hybrid (RSH) GGA that also performs well for optical excitation energies, CAM-QTP-01 may be a viable option. The D4 dispersion model, with its partial charge dependence, appears to be clearly superior to D3BJ and even possibly NL. Should one require a double hybrid without dispersion model, noDispSD-SCAN is a viable option. Performance for the MOBH35 transition metal benchmark is different: the best double hybrids are competitive but not superior to {\omega}B97M-V, which offers the best performance compromise for mixed main group-transition metal problems.Comment: 5 pages (ICCMSE-2019 conference proceedings), AIP Conference Proceedings, in pres

Does GLPT2 Offer Any Actual Benefit Over Conventional HF-MP2 In the Context of Double-Hybrid Density Functionals?

While the inclusion of the nonlocal correlation in fifth rung "double hybrid" functionals is definitely beneficial, one might rightfully ask whether its evaluation in the basis of Kohn-Sham (KS) orbitals has additional value compared to the use of Hartree-Fock reference orbitals (in a type of multilevel scheme). We have investigated this question for a very large and chemically diverse dataset, GMTKN55. We conclude that KS reference orbitals are undoubtedly beneficial, but the benefit is not as large as one might intuitively expect.Comment: 4 pages, AIP Conference Proceedings, in press (ICCMSE-2021

Performance of Localized-Orbital Coupled Cluster Approaches for the Conformational Energies of Longer n-alkane Chains

We report an update and enhancement of the ACONFL (conformer energies of large alkanes [Ehlert, S.; Grimme, S.; Hansen, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 3521-3535]) dataset. For the ACONF12 (n-dodecane) subset, we report basis set limit canonical CCSD(T) reference data obtained from MP2-F12/cc-pV{T,Q}Z-F12 extrapolation, [CCSD(F12*)-MP2-F12]/aug-cc-pVTZ-F12, and a (T) correction from conventional CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pV{D,T}Z calculations. Then we explored the performance of a variety of single and composite localized-orbital CCSD(T) approximations, ultimately finding an affordable LNO-CCSD(T)-based post-MP2 correction that agrees to 0.008 kcal/mol MAD (mean absolute deviation) with the revised canonical reference data. In tandem with canonical MP2-F12/CBS extrapolation, this was then used to re-evaluate the ACONF16 and ACONF20 subsets for n-hexadecane and n-icosane, respectively. A revised ACONFL set was thus obtained. It was then used to assess the performance of different localized-orbital coupled cluster approaches, such as PNO-LCCSD(T) as implemented in MOLPRO, DLPNO-CCSD (T1) as implemented in ORCA, and LNO-CCSD(T) as implemented in MRCC, at their various accuracy settings. A three-tier LNO-CCSD(T)-based composite scheme disagrees by only 0.02 kcal/mol from the revised ACONFL reference data. When extrapolated to the complete PNO space limit, DLPNO-CCSD(T1, Tight) and a composite method are the best picks among all the localized coupled cluster methods tested for the dodecane conformers. Dispersion-corrected dRPA-based double hybrids perform remarkably well for the ACONFL set. While the revised reference data do not affect any conclusions on the less accurate methods, they may upend orderings for more accurate methods with error statistics on the same order as the difference between reference datasets.Comment: 28 pages, submitte

An Exchange-Based Diagnostic for Static Correlation

We propose here a DFT-based diagnostic for static correlation %TAEX[TPSS@HF - HF] which effectively measures how different the DFT and HF exchange energies for a given HF density are. This and %TAEcorr[TPSS] are two cost-effective a priori estimates for the adequacy of the importance of static correlation. %TAEX[TPSS@HF - HF] contains nearly the same information as the earlier A diagnostic, but may be more intuitive to understand. Principal component and variable clustering analysis of a large number of static correlation diagnostics reveals much of the variation is explained by just two components, and almost all of it by four; these are blocked by four variable clusters (single excitations; correlation entropy; double excitations; pragmatic energetics).Comment: 5 pages, AIP Conference Proceedings, in press (ICCMSE-2021

Is explicitly correlated double hybrid DFT advantageous for vibrational frequencies?

We have investigated the effect of F12 geminals on the basis set convergence of harmonic frequencies calculated using two representative double-hybrid density functionals, namely B2GP-PLYP and revDSD-PBEP86-D4. Like previously found for energetics [N. Mehta and J. M. L. Martin, \textit{J. Chem. Theor. Comput.} \textbf{18}, 5978--5991 (2022)] one sees an acceleration by two zeta steps, such that even the cc-pVDZ-F12 basis set is quite close to the complete basis set (CBS) limit. However, the basis set convergence problem is not as acute as for energetics, and compared to experimental harmonic frequencies, conventional orbital calculations with augmented triple zeta quality basis set are acceptably close to the CBS limit, and can be carried out using analytical second derivatives. An efficient implementation of double hybrid-F12 analytical derivatives would make the F12 approach attractive in the sense that even an $spd$ orbital basis set would be adequate. For the accurate revDSD-PBEP86-D4 functional, the role of differing local correlation terms (Perdew-Zunger 1981 vs. VWN5) in different electronic structure programs has been investigated: while optimal double hybrid parameters and performance statistics for energetics as well as frequencies differ slightly between the two implementations, these differences are insignificant for practical purposes.Comment: Can. J. Chem., submitted (WATOC 2022 special issue

The S66 Noncovalent Interaction Benchmark Re-examined: Composite Localized Coupled Cluster Approaches

The S66 non-covalent interactions are studied through localized coupled-cluster methods and general LNO-CCSD(T)-based composite schemes. Very small RMS deviations (\leq 0.05 kcal/mol) for the low-cost composite approaches from the SILVER reference interaction energies of S66 indicate that we can safely avoid carrying out the largest basis set calculations with veryVeryTight thresholds, and apply instead additivity corrections in smaller basis sets. Interestingly, the counterpoise corrections do not have an appreciable effect on the composite schemes. These findings may prove useful for intermolecular and intramolecular NCIs of larger systems.Comment: 6 pages, AIP Conference Proceedings, in press (ICCMSE-2021

S66x8 Noncovalent Interactions Revisited: New Benchmark and Performance of Composite Localized Coupled-Cluster Methods

The S66x8 noncovalent interactions benchmark has been re-evaluated at the "sterling silver" level, using explicitly correlated MP2-F12 near the complete basis set limit, CCSD(F12*)/aug-cc-pVTZ-F12, and a (T) correction from conventional CCSD(T)/sano-V{D,T}Z+ calculations. The revised reference value disagrees by 0.1 kcal/mol RMS with the original Hobza benchmark and its revision by Brauer et al, but by only 0.04 kcal/mol variety from the "bronze" level data in Kesharwani et al., Aust. J. Chem. 71, 238-248 (2018). We then used these to assess the performance of localized-orbital coupled cluster approaches with and without counterpoise corrections, such as PNO-LCCSD(T) as implemented in MOLPRO, DLPNO-CCSD (T1) as implemented in ORCA, and LNO-CCSD(T) as implemented in MRCC, for their respective "Normal", "Tight", and "very Tight" settings. We also considered composite approaches combining different basis sets and cutoffs. Furthermore, in order to isolate basis set convergence from domain truncation error, for the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set we compared PNO, DLPNO, and LNO approaches with canonical CCSD(T). We conclude that LNO-CCSD(T) with veryTight criteria performs very well for "raw" (CP-uncorrected), but struggles to reproduce counterpoise-corrected numbers even for veryVeryTight criteria: this means that accurate results can be obtained using either extrapolation from basis sets large enough to quench basis set superposition error (BSSE) such as aug-cc-pV{Q,5}Z, or using a composite scheme such as Tight{T,Q}+1.11[vvTight(T) - Tight(T)]. In contrast, PNO-LCCSD(T) works best with counterpoise, while performance with and without counterpoise is comparable for DLPNO-CCSD(T1). Among more economical methods, the highest accuracies are seen for dRPA75-D3BJ, {\omega}B97M-V, {\omega}B97M(2), revDSD-PBEP86-D4, and DFT(SAPT) with a TDEXX or ATDEXX kernel.Comment: Final published version with CC licens

Do Double Hybrid Functionals Benefit from Regularization in the PT2 term? Observations from an Extensive Benchmark

We put to the test a recent suggestion [Shee, J.; Loipersberger, M.; Rettig, A.; Lee, J.; Head-Gordon, M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12 (50), 12084–12097] that MP2 regularization might improve the performance of double-hybrid density functionals. Using the very large and chemically diverse GMTKN55 benchmark, we find that κ-regularization is indeed beneficial at lower percentages of Hartree-Fock exchange, especially if spin-component scaling is not applied (such as in B2GP-PLYP or ωB97M(2)). This benefit dwindles for DSD and DOD functionals, and vanishes entirely in the ca. 70% HF exchange region optimal for them