22 research outputs found

    Hong Kong\u27s Discriminatory Air Time: Family Viewing Hours and the Case of \u3ci\u3eCho Man Kit v. Broadcasting Authority\u3c/i\u3e

    Get PDF
    Hong Kong’s long standing commitment to media and press freedom came under question when the Broadcasting Authority issued a ruling against a television show about same-sex couples. In deciding Cho Man Kit v. Broadcasting Authority, the Court of First Instance affirmed that sexual orientation must be afforded freedom of expression in public broadcasting. However, the Court found that the Broadcasting Authority had lawfully ruled that the show be excluded from family viewing hours. Though the opinion was in many ways a legal victory for homosexuals in Hong Kong, this Comment argues that the family viewing hours ruling undermines the cornerstone principle of equality in Hong Kong society. In its analysis, the Court misconstrued the “sex and nudity” provision of the Broadcasting Authority Code of Practice in a discriminatory manner such that homosexuality was hypersexualized. In addition, the Court used a legally insufficient proportionality test to analyze the family viewing hours provision in defiance of both legal precedent and Hong Kong public policy. For this reason, the second half of the Court’s opinion is infused with the very discrimination the Court sought to prevent

    The Benefits of Integrating Statutory Construction and Analysis in a First-Year Legal Writing Course

    Get PDF
    Teaching statutory analysis to first-year law school students not only reinforces important principles of legal analysis and writing (from gaining a better understanding of the hierarchy of legal authorities to continuing to practice IRAC/CRAC methods of organization), but it also prepares students better for the actual practice of law

    Using Therapeutic Principles in the Legal Writing Classroom

    Get PDF
    Research for over 50 years on the experience of students and teachers supports the use of therapeutic principles to promote a classroom space that fosters cooperation, interaction, diversity, and responsibility. By understanding communication, social interactions, and cognition principles, teachers teach more effectively and students learn more easily. The converse is true, however. Poor communication, assumptions, lack of mindfulness, or fixed mindsets all lead to lack of motivation, poor teaching, and poor learning. Unlike school teachers, most law professors do not have any training with these psychological principles. Thus, legal teaching can be rigid, competitive, harsh, and ill-suited to students facing an increasingly complex and painful world

    Re: Emails

    No full text
    Writing an email that isn’t a burden for its recipient can be difficult. Writing one that’s enjoyable is even harder. Effective email communication should help, not frustrate, your intended audience. The following practice tips are designed to help attorneys (or anyone) write a good email. Or at least one that isn’t annoying

    Words of a Feather: Poetry as a Tool for Legal Writing

    No full text
    Poems—expressions of inner life that had at first seemed purely fanciful to me—have become foundational to how I teach legal writing. Poems are built with similar conventions to those used to write a legal brief, and reading and writing poetry can help lawyers develop thoughtful prose, perspective, and style. Poems implicitly ask a reader to pay attention with a heightened awareness of language. They use imagery to convey ideas, inspire empathy in a reader, and communicate a theme, and they rely on structure and variety to shape a reader’s experience. Legal writing has more practical ends than poetry—generally to advise or persuade a reader—but it is agile, too, and begins where all writing begins—with the search for a word

    The Importance of Being Earnest: Writing an Effective Supplemental Authorities Letter

    No full text
    On its face, Rule 28(j) does not ask a lot of practitioners: merely that they identify “pertinent and significant” authorities and “promptly” advise the court of the supplemental authorities’ relevance to the case in “350 words.” But it also doesn’t give a lot of guidance. What is “pertinent and significant”? When is “promptly”? And what can you say in a mere 350 words? Effective appellate advocates consider these questions and walk a careful line to follow the letter and the spirit of the rule. To ensure your letters help your case, here are a few practice tips for crafting effective one
    corecore