5 research outputs found
User acceptance: the key to evaluating SODIS and other methods for household water treatment and safe storage
Household water treatment has been identified as one effective strategy to interrupt transmission routes
of diarrhoea causing
pathogens, and thus to mitigate the global burden of waterborne
diseases. And yet,
the commitment of governments and international organizations to integrate household water treatment
and safe storage (HWTS) into their water supply, sanitation, and hygiene promotion programmes
remains limited. More efforts are required to scale up the initial successes in the promotion of HWTS
methods, and to achieve sustainable application at user level. This article illustrates the experience with
the promotion of one particular HWTS approach solar
water disinfection (SODIS) as
an input to the
debate on effectiveness, user acceptance, and integrated planning in the context of HWTS approaches
User acceptance: the key to evaluating SODIS and other methods for household water treatment and safe storage
Household water treatment has been identified as one effective strategy to interrupt transmission routes
of diarrhoea causing
pathogens, and thus to mitigate the global burden of waterborne
diseases. And yet,
the commitment of governments and international organizations to integrate household water treatment
and safe storage (HWTS) into their water supply, sanitation, and hygiene promotion programmes
remains limited. More efforts are required to scale up the initial successes in the promotion of HWTS
methods, and to achieve sustainable application at user level. This article illustrates the experience with
the promotion of one particular HWTS approach solar
water disinfection (SODIS) as
an input to the
debate on effectiveness, user acceptance, and integrated planning in the context of HWTS approaches
Arsenic Removal from Groundwater by Household Sand Filters: Comparative Field Study, Model Calculations, and Health Benefits
Arsenic removal efficiencies of 43 household sand filters
were studied in rural areas of the Red River Delta in
Vietnam. Simultaneously, raw groundwater from the same
households and additional 31 tubewells was sampled to
investigate arsenic coprecipitation with hydrous ferric iron
from solution, i.e., without contact to sand surfaces.
From the groundwaters containing 10−382 μg/L As, <0.1−48 mg/L Fe, <0.01−3.7 mg/L P, and 0.05−3.3 mg/L Mn,
similar average removal rates of 80% and 76% were found
for the sand filter and coprecipitation experiments,
respectively. The filtering process requires only a few
minutes. Removal efficiencies of Fe, phosphate, and Mn
were >99%, 90%, and 71%, respectively. The concentration
of dissolved iron in groundwater was the decisive factor
for the removal of arsenic. Residual arsenic levels below 50
μg/L were achieved by 90% of the studied sand filters,
and 40% were even below 10 μg/L. Fe/As ratios of ≥50 or
≥250 were required to ensure arsenic removal to levels
below 50 or 10 μg/L, respectively. Phosphate concentrations
>2.5 mg P/L slightly hampered the sand filter and
coprecipitation efficiencies. Interestingly, the overall
arsenic elimination was higher than predicted from model
calculations based on sorption constants determined
from coprecipitation experiments with artificial groundwater.
This observation is assumed to result from As(III) oxidation
involving Mn, microorganisms, and possibly dissolved
organic matter present in the natural groundwaters. Clear
evidence of lowered arsenic burden for people consuming
sand-filtered water is demonstrated from hair analyses. The
investigated sand filters proved to operate fast and
robust for a broad range of groundwater composition and
are thus also a viable option for mitigation in other
arsenic affected regions. An estimation conducted for
Bangladesh indicates that a median residual level of 25
μg/L arsenic could be reached in 84% of the polluted
groundwater. The easily observable removal of iron from
the pumped water makes the effect of a sand filter immediately
recognizable even to people who are not aware of the
arsenic problem
Arsenic Removal from Groundwater by Household Sand Filters: Comparative Field Study, Model Calculations, and Health Benefits
Arsenic removal efficiencies of 43 household sand filters
were studied in rural areas of the Red River Delta in
Vietnam. Simultaneously, raw groundwater from the same
households and additional 31 tubewells was sampled to
investigate arsenic coprecipitation with hydrous ferric iron
from solution, i.e., without contact to sand surfaces.
From the groundwaters containing 10−382 μg/L As, <0.1−48 mg/L Fe, <0.01−3.7 mg/L P, and 0.05−3.3 mg/L Mn,
similar average removal rates of 80% and 76% were found
for the sand filter and coprecipitation experiments,
respectively. The filtering process requires only a few
minutes. Removal efficiencies of Fe, phosphate, and Mn
were >99%, 90%, and 71%, respectively. The concentration
of dissolved iron in groundwater was the decisive factor
for the removal of arsenic. Residual arsenic levels below 50
μg/L were achieved by 90% of the studied sand filters,
and 40% were even below 10 μg/L. Fe/As ratios of ≥50 or
≥250 were required to ensure arsenic removal to levels
below 50 or 10 μg/L, respectively. Phosphate concentrations
>2.5 mg P/L slightly hampered the sand filter and
coprecipitation efficiencies. Interestingly, the overall
arsenic elimination was higher than predicted from model
calculations based on sorption constants determined
from coprecipitation experiments with artificial groundwater.
This observation is assumed to result from As(III) oxidation
involving Mn, microorganisms, and possibly dissolved
organic matter present in the natural groundwaters. Clear
evidence of lowered arsenic burden for people consuming
sand-filtered water is demonstrated from hair analyses. The
investigated sand filters proved to operate fast and
robust for a broad range of groundwater composition and
are thus also a viable option for mitigation in other
arsenic affected regions. An estimation conducted for
Bangladesh indicates that a median residual level of 25
μg/L arsenic could be reached in 84% of the polluted
groundwater. The easily observable removal of iron from
the pumped water makes the effect of a sand filter immediately
recognizable even to people who are not aware of the
arsenic problem
Mechanisms and Products of Surface-Mediated Reductive Dehalogenation of Carbon Tetrachloride by Fe(II) on Goethite
Natural attenuation processes of chlorinated solvents in
soils and groundwaters are increasingly considered as
options to manage contaminated sites. Under anoxic
conditions, reactions with ferrous iron sorbed at iron(hyro)xides may dominate the overall transformation of carbon
tetrachloride (CCl4) and other chlorinated aliphatic
hydrocarbons. We investigated mechanisms and product
formation of CCl4 reduction by Fe(II) sorbed to goethite, which
may lead to completely dehalogenated products or to
chloroform (CHCl3), a toxic product which is fairly persistent
under anoxic conditions. A simultaneous transfer of two
electrons and cleavage of two C−Cl bonds of CCl4 would
completely circumvent chloroform production. To distinguish
between initial one- or two-bond cleavage, 13C-isotope
fractionation of CCl4 was studied for reactions with Fe(II)/goethite (isotopic enrichment factor ε = −26.5‰) and
with model systems for one C−Cl bond cleavage and either
single-electron transfer (Fe(II) porphyrin, ε = −26.1‰) or
partial two-electron transfer (polysulfide, ε = −22.2‰). These
ε values differ significantly from calculations for simultaneous
cleavage of two C−Cl bonds (ε ≈ −50‰), indicating
that only one C−Cl bond is broken in the critical first step
of the reaction. At pH 7, reduction of CCl4 by Fe(II)/goethite produced ∼33% CHCl3, 20% carbon monoxide
(CO), and up to 40% formate (HCOO-). Addition of 2-propanol-d8 resulted in 33% CDCl3 and only 4% CO, indicating that
both products were generated from trichloromethyl radicals
(•CCl3), chloroform by reaction with hydrogen radical
donors and CO by an alternative pathway likely to involve
surface-bound intermediates. Hydrolysis of CO to HCOO-
was surface-catalyzed by goethite but was too slow to account
for the measured formate concentrations. Chloroform
yields slightly increased with pH at constant Fe(II) sorption
density, suggesting that pH-dependent surface processes
direct product branching ratios. Surface-stabilized
intermediates may thus facilitate abiotic mineralization of
CCl4, whereas the presence of H radical donors, such as
natural organic matter, enhances formation of toxic
CHCl3
