Cytogenetic complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: definitions, associations and clinical impact

Recent evidence suggests that complex karyotype (CK) defined by the presence of 653 chromosomal aberrations (structural and/or numerical) identified by chromosome banding analysis (CBA) may be relevant for treatment decision-making in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, many challenges towards routine clinical application of CBA remain. In a retrospective study of 5290 patients with available CBA data, we explored both clinicobiological associations and the clinical impact of CK in CLL. We found that patients with 655 abnormalities, defined as high-CK, exhibit uniformly dismal clinical outcome, independently of clinical stage, TP53 aberrations (deletion of chromosome 17p and or TP53 mutations, TP53abs) and the expression of somatically hypermutated (M-CLL) or unmutated (U-CLL) immunoglobulin heavy variable genes (IGHV). Thus, they contrasted CK cases with 3 or 4 aberrations (low-CK and intermediate-CK, respectively) who followed aggressive disease courses only in the presence of TP53abs. At the other end of the spectrum, patients with CK and +12,+19 displayed an exceptionally indolent profile. Building upon CK, TP53abs and IGHV gene somatic hypermutation status, we propose a novel hierarchical model where patients with high-CK exhibit the worst prognosis, while M-CLL lacking CK or TP53abs as well as CK with +12,+19 show the longest overall survival. In conclusion, CK should not be axiomatically considered unfavorable in CLL, representing a heterogeneous group with variable clinical behavior. High-CK with 655 chromosomal aberrations emerges as prognostically adverse, independently of other biomarkers. Prospective clinical validation is warranted before finally incorporating high-CK in risk stratification of CLL

Molecular characterization of AML with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 at diagnosis and relapse reveals net loss of co-mutations

Abstract. AML with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion is a WHO entity with a favorable outcome following intensive chemotherapy. The absence of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts in remission defines complete molecular response and correlates with a superior survival. However, a significant proportion of patients still relapses and defining molecular risk factors that identify patients at diagnosis or at molecular remission that are at risk of relapse could help tailor treatment strategies for those high risk patients. Here, we analyze a cohort of 94 patients that reach a molecular remission (MR) following intensive treatment and identify 21 patients that relapse despite achieving MR. Using targeted sequencing of 63 genes implicated in hematologic malignancies we show that at diagnosis patients who relapse following MR have a higher burden of co-mutated genes than patients that do not relapse (median = 2 vs median = 0; P = 0.0156). This resulted in a relapse free survival rate of 65% vs 86% at 2 years, respectively (≥1 co-mutation vs no co-mutation, P = 0.02) with a trend for inferior overall survival (n.s.). Applying sensitive sequencing to reassess mutations at relapse in paired samples of 17/21 patients we demonstrate a net loss of co-mutations at relapse: median 2 (range 0–5) vs 1 (0–4) at diagnosis and relapse (P = 0.048). At relapse more patients had no detected co-mutation compared to diagnosis (47% vs 17%, P = 0.034). Co-mutations at diagnosis, therefore, might represent a general susceptibility of the AML clone to acquire mutations and the true nature of 2nd hit mutations that drive leukemia has to be defined for AML with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion