32 research outputs found
Physiological, Metabolic, and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal the Responses of <i>Arabidopsis</i> Seedlings to Carbon Nanohorns
Carbon-based
nanomaterials have potential applications in nanoenabled
agriculture. However, the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying
single-walled carbon nanohorn (SWCNH)-mediated plant growth remain
unclear. Here, we investigated the effects of SWCNHs on Arabidopsis grown in 1/4-strength Murashige and Skoog
medium via physiological, genetic, and molecular analyses. Treatment
with 0.1 mg/L SWCNHs promoted primary root (PR) growth and lateral
root (LR) formation; 50 and 100 mg/L SWCNHs inhibited PR growth. Treatment
with 0.1 mg/L SWCNHs increased the lengths of the meristematic and
elongation zones, and transcriptomic and genetic analyses confirmed
the positive effects of SWCNHs on root tip stem cell niche activity
and meristematic cell division potential. Increased expression of YUC3 and YUC5 and increased PIN2 abundance
improved PR growth and LR development in 0.1 mg/L SWCNH-treated seedlings.
Metabolomic analyses revealed that SWCNHs altered the levels of sugars,
amino acids, and organic acids, suggesting that SWCNHs reprogrammed
carbon/nitrogen metabolism in plants. SWCNHs also regulate plant growth
and development by increasing the levels of several secondary metabolites;
transcriptomic analyses further supported these results. The present
results are valuable for continued use of SWCNHs in agri-nanotechnology,
and these molecular approaches could serve as examples for studies
on the effects of nanomaterials in plants
Additional file 2 of Preoperative serum bilirubin is an independent prognostic factor for curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Supplementary Material
Additional file 3 of Preoperative serum bilirubin is an independent prognostic factor for curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Supplementary Material
Comparative Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal the Toxic Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles on Plant Growth
Zinc
oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (nZnO) are among the most commonly
used nanoparticles (NPs), and they have been shown to have harmful
effects on plants. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying nZnO
tolerance and root sensing of NP stresses have not been elucidated.
Here, we compared the differential toxic effects of nZnO and Zn2+ toxicity on plants during exposure and recovery using a
combination of transcriptomic and physiological analyses. Although
both nZnO and Zn2+ inhibited primary root (PR) growth,
nZnO had a stronger inhibitory effect on the growth of elongation
zones, whereas Zn2+ toxicity had a stronger toxic effect
on meristem cells. Timely recovery from stresses is critical for plant
survival. Despite the stronger inhibitory effect of nZnO on PR growth,
nZnO-exposed plants recovered from stress more rapidly than Zn2+-exposed plants upon transfer to normal conditions, and transcriptome
data supported these results. In contrast to Zn2+ toxicity,
nZnO induced endocytosis and caused microfilament rearrangement in
the epidermal cells of elongation zones, thereby repressing PR growth.
nZnO also repressed PR growth by disrupting cell wall organization
and structure through both physical interactions and transcriptional
regulation. The present study provides new insight into the comprehensive
understanding and re-evaluation of NP toxicity in plants
Comparative Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal the Toxic Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles on Plant Growth
Zinc
oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (nZnO) are among the most commonly
used nanoparticles (NPs), and they have been shown to have harmful
effects on plants. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying nZnO
tolerance and root sensing of NP stresses have not been elucidated.
Here, we compared the differential toxic effects of nZnO and Zn2+ toxicity on plants during exposure and recovery using a
combination of transcriptomic and physiological analyses. Although
both nZnO and Zn2+ inhibited primary root (PR) growth,
nZnO had a stronger inhibitory effect on the growth of elongation
zones, whereas Zn2+ toxicity had a stronger toxic effect
on meristem cells. Timely recovery from stresses is critical for plant
survival. Despite the stronger inhibitory effect of nZnO on PR growth,
nZnO-exposed plants recovered from stress more rapidly than Zn2+-exposed plants upon transfer to normal conditions, and transcriptome
data supported these results. In contrast to Zn2+ toxicity,
nZnO induced endocytosis and caused microfilament rearrangement in
the epidermal cells of elongation zones, thereby repressing PR growth.
nZnO also repressed PR growth by disrupting cell wall organization
and structure through both physical interactions and transcriptional
regulation. The present study provides new insight into the comprehensive
understanding and re-evaluation of NP toxicity in plants
Comparative Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal the Toxic Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles on Plant Growth
Zinc
oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (nZnO) are among the most commonly
used nanoparticles (NPs), and they have been shown to have harmful
effects on plants. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying nZnO
tolerance and root sensing of NP stresses have not been elucidated.
Here, we compared the differential toxic effects of nZnO and Zn2+ toxicity on plants during exposure and recovery using a
combination of transcriptomic and physiological analyses. Although
both nZnO and Zn2+ inhibited primary root (PR) growth,
nZnO had a stronger inhibitory effect on the growth of elongation
zones, whereas Zn2+ toxicity had a stronger toxic effect
on meristem cells. Timely recovery from stresses is critical for plant
survival. Despite the stronger inhibitory effect of nZnO on PR growth,
nZnO-exposed plants recovered from stress more rapidly than Zn2+-exposed plants upon transfer to normal conditions, and transcriptome
data supported these results. In contrast to Zn2+ toxicity,
nZnO induced endocytosis and caused microfilament rearrangement in
the epidermal cells of elongation zones, thereby repressing PR growth.
nZnO also repressed PR growth by disrupting cell wall organization
and structure through both physical interactions and transcriptional
regulation. The present study provides new insight into the comprehensive
understanding and re-evaluation of NP toxicity in plants
Comparative Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal the Toxic Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles on Plant Growth
Zinc
oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (nZnO) are among the most commonly
used nanoparticles (NPs), and they have been shown to have harmful
effects on plants. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying nZnO
tolerance and root sensing of NP stresses have not been elucidated.
Here, we compared the differential toxic effects of nZnO and Zn2+ toxicity on plants during exposure and recovery using a
combination of transcriptomic and physiological analyses. Although
both nZnO and Zn2+ inhibited primary root (PR) growth,
nZnO had a stronger inhibitory effect on the growth of elongation
zones, whereas Zn2+ toxicity had a stronger toxic effect
on meristem cells. Timely recovery from stresses is critical for plant
survival. Despite the stronger inhibitory effect of nZnO on PR growth,
nZnO-exposed plants recovered from stress more rapidly than Zn2+-exposed plants upon transfer to normal conditions, and transcriptome
data supported these results. In contrast to Zn2+ toxicity,
nZnO induced endocytosis and caused microfilament rearrangement in
the epidermal cells of elongation zones, thereby repressing PR growth.
nZnO also repressed PR growth by disrupting cell wall organization
and structure through both physical interactions and transcriptional
regulation. The present study provides new insight into the comprehensive
understanding and re-evaluation of NP toxicity in plants
Additional file 1 of Preoperative serum bilirubin is an independent prognostic factor for curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Supplementary Material
Comparative Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal the Toxic Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles on Plant Growth
Zinc
oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (nZnO) are among the most commonly
used nanoparticles (NPs), and they have been shown to have harmful
effects on plants. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying nZnO
tolerance and root sensing of NP stresses have not been elucidated.
Here, we compared the differential toxic effects of nZnO and Zn2+ toxicity on plants during exposure and recovery using a
combination of transcriptomic and physiological analyses. Although
both nZnO and Zn2+ inhibited primary root (PR) growth,
nZnO had a stronger inhibitory effect on the growth of elongation
zones, whereas Zn2+ toxicity had a stronger toxic effect
on meristem cells. Timely recovery from stresses is critical for plant
survival. Despite the stronger inhibitory effect of nZnO on PR growth,
nZnO-exposed plants recovered from stress more rapidly than Zn2+-exposed plants upon transfer to normal conditions, and transcriptome
data supported these results. In contrast to Zn2+ toxicity,
nZnO induced endocytosis and caused microfilament rearrangement in
the epidermal cells of elongation zones, thereby repressing PR growth.
nZnO also repressed PR growth by disrupting cell wall organization
and structure through both physical interactions and transcriptional
regulation. The present study provides new insight into the comprehensive
understanding and re-evaluation of NP toxicity in plants
