2 research outputs found
Synergistic Chemical Looping Process Coupling Natural Gas Conversion and NO<i><sub>x</sub></i> Purification
We present a novel low-temperature chemical looping combustion
scheme for simultaneous natural gas conversion into a sequestration-ready
CO2 stream and NOx purification.
The scheme employs nickel oxide (NiO) supported on ZrO2 as the oxygen carrier. In the process, CH4 reduces the
oxidized carrier to Ni/ZrO2 in a co-current moving bed
reactor, which is then oxidized back to NiO/ZrO2 by the
NOx-laden flue gas in a fluidized bed
reactor, completing the oxygen carrier loop. Thermodynamic studies
demonstrate that the presence of CO2 does not significantly
affect NOx purification performance at
different flue gas flow rates. The operating temperatures of the reactors
are selected based on NOx-temperature
programmed oxidation (TPO) and CH4-temperature programmed
reduction (TPR) experiments. Results show that the process can optimally
operate at temperatures close to the combustion plants’ flue
gas temperature of 400–500 °C, reducing the need for hot
utilities. The study conducts comprehensive isothermal and autothermal
analyses of the process to evaluate the effects of temperature and
carrier flow rate on CH4 conversion, CO2 selectivity,
carbon deposition, and NOx conversion.
For the autothermal analysis, the CH4 reactor operates
adiabatically, while the NOx reactor operates
isothermally. Comparative studies with the conventional NOx selective catalytic reduction (SCR) process
indicate an exergy efficiency and effective thermal efficiency (ETE)
improvement of 9 and 18 percentage points, respectively. The findings
suggest that this low-temperature chemical looping process is a promising
solution for flue gas NOx treatment, utilizing
cheaper natural gas as the reductant and eliminating environmental
concerns, such as ammonia or urea slippage. Overall, this study contributes
to the development of more efficient and sustainable methods for reducing
NOx emissions
Thermodynamic Evaluation of the Cross-Current Moving-Bed Chemical Looping Configuration for Efficient Conversion of Biomass to Syngas
The rising chemical demand and its
associated concern of climate
change have put an impetus on converting diverse domestic sources
to valuable products in a decarbonized manner. Lignocellulosic biomass,
a viable feedstock, is garnering significant attention as a sustainable
alternative to fossil fuels. However, challenges in handling biomass
feed variability and effectively processing its char and tar contents
have hampered its commercial deployment. However, the chemical looping-based
biomass-to-syngas (BTS) technology being developed by The Ohio State
University is among the most promising technologies for industrial
biomass reforming. It utilizes proprietary iron oxide particles in
a cocurrent moving-bed reactor, leveraging the flow dynamics to transform
biomass to syngas, and has been proven to be more efficient than conventional
processes. However, this cocurrent system suffers from a thermodynamic
barrier, inhibiting the syngas yield. To overcome this barrier, a
novel chemical looping cross-current system is developed and investigated
through detailed thermodynamic ASPEN studies after accounting for
practical constraints. The barrier in the cocurrent system can be
attributed to the equilibrium between exiting syngas and solid streams,
which limits the oxidation of oxygen carriers. The cross-current reactor
system overcomes this issue by shifting the exit of the syngas stream
to the middle of the reactor, thus not allowing the exiting syngas
and solid streams to be in equilibrium and creating a cocurrent section
above the syngas exit and a countercurrent section below it. Thermodynamic
simulations conducted under autothermal conditions reveal that the
cocurrent and cross-current systems perform similarly with steam and
CO2 co-injection. However, under an isothermal condition,
which is now feasible with cheaper and sustainable heating methods,
the cross-current system achieves ∼34% higher syngas yield
over the cocurrent system (∼0.074 in cross-current compared
to ∼0.055 in cocurrent) for both steam and CO2 co-injection.
The findings from this study justify the scale-up of the cross-current
system and provide system-level insights into biomass valorization
