Biomarker-guided antibiotic stewardship in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAPrapid2) : a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation

Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the most common intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection, yet accurate diagnosis remains difficult, leading to overuse of antibiotics. Low concentrations of IL-1β and IL-8 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid have been validated as effective markers for exclusion of ventilator-associated pneumonia. The VAPrapid2 trial aimed to determine whether measurement of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid IL-1β and IL-8 could effectively and safely improve antibiotic stewardship in patients with clinically suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Methods VAPrapid2 was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in patients admitted to 24 ICUs from 17 National Health Service hospital trusts across England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Patients were screened for eligibility and included if they were 18 years or older, intubated and mechanically ventilated for at least 48 h, and had suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics (intervention group) or routine use of antibiotics (control group) using a web-based randomisation service hosted by Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit. Patients were randomised using randomly permuted blocks of size four and six and stratified by site, with allocation concealment. Clinicians were masked to patient assignment for an initial period until biomarker results were reported. Bronchoalveolar lavage was done in all patients, with concentrations of IL-1β and IL-8 rapidly determined in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients randomised to the biomarker-based antibiotic recommendation group. If concentrations were below a previously validated cutoff, clinicians were advised that ventilator-associated pneumonia was unlikely and to consider discontinuing antibiotics. Patients in the routine use of antibiotics group received antibiotics according to usual practice at sites. Microbiology was done on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from all patients and ventilator-associated pneumonia was confirmed by at least 104 colony forming units per mL of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. The primary outcome was the distribution of antibiotic-free days in the 7 days following bronchoalveolar lavage. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, with an additional per-protocol analysis that excluded patients randomly assigned to the intervention group who defaulted to routine use of antibiotics because of failure to return an adequate biomarker result. An embedded process evaluation assessed factors influencing trial adoption, recruitment, and decision making. This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN65937227, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01972425. Findings Between Nov 6, 2013, and Sept 13, 2016, 360 patients were screened for inclusion in the study. 146 patients were ineligible, leaving 214 who were recruited to the study. Four patients were excluded before randomisation, meaning that 210 patients were randomly assigned to biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics (n=104) or routine use of antibiotics (n=106). One patient in the biomarker-guided recommendation group was withdrawn by the clinical team before bronchoscopy and so was excluded from the intention-to-treat analysis. We found no significant difference in the primary outcome of the distribution of antibiotic-free days in the 7 days following bronchoalveolar lavage in the intention-to-treat analysis (p=0·58). Bronchoalveolar lavage was associated with a small and transient increase in oxygen requirements. Established prescribing practices, reluctance for bronchoalveolar lavage, and dependence on a chain of trial-related procedures emerged as factors that impaired trial processes

COVID-19 Pneumothorax in the United Kingdom: a prospective observational study using the ISARIC WHO clinical characterisation protocol.

Population level data from 131 679 patients show that COVID-19 pneumothorax occurs in 0.97% of admitted patients, especially males and smokers, and is associated with increased mortality

Randomised controlled trial of GM-CSF in critically ill patients with impaired neutrophil phagocytosis

Background. Critically ill patients with impaired neutrophil phagocytosis have significantly increased risk of nosocomial infection. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) improves phagocytosis by neutrophils ex vivo. This study tested the hypothesis that GM-CSF improves neutrophil phagocytosis in critically ill patients in whom phagocytosis is known to be impaired Methods. This was a multi-centre, phase 2a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial Using a personalised medicine approach, only critically ill patients with impaired neutrophil phagocytosis were included. Patients were randomised 1:1 to subcutaneous GM-CSF (3 microgrammws/kg/day) or placebo, once daily for 4 days. The primary outcome measure was neutrophil phagocytosis 2 days after initiation of GM-CSF. Secondary outcomes included neutrophil phagocytosis over time, neutrophil functions other than phagocytosis, monocyte HLA-DR expression, and safety. Results. Thirty-eight patients were recruited from 5 intensive care units (17 randomised to GM-CSF). Mean neutrophil phagocytosis at day 2 was 57.2% (SD 13.2%) in the GM-CSF group and 49.8% (13.4%) in the placebo group, p=0.73. The proportion of patients with neutrophil phagocytosis >50% at day 2, and monocyte HLA-DR, appeared significantly higher in the GM-CSF group. Neutrophil functions other than phagocytosis did not appear significantly different between the groups. The most common adverse event associated with GM-CSF was pyrexia. Conclusions. GM-CSF did not improve mean neutrophil phagocytosis at day 2, but was safe and appeared to increase the proportion of patients with adequate phagocytosis. The study suggests proof of principle for a pharmacological effect on neutrophil function in a subset of critically ill patients.This work was funded by a grant from the Medical Research Council (G1100233), with additional support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre. It was sponsored by Newcastle Universit

Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by exogenous and endogenous GDF15.

An acute increase in the circulating concentration of glucocorticoid hormones is essential for the survival of severe somatic stresses. Circulating concentrations of GDF15, a hormone that acts in the brain to reduce food intake, are frequently elevated in stressful states. We now report that GDF15 potently activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in mice and rats. A blocking antibody to the GDNF-family receptor α-like receptor completely prevented the corticosterone response to GDF15 administration. In wild-type mice exposed to a range of stressful stimuli, circulating levels of both corticosterone and GDF15 rose acutely. In the case of Escherichia coli or lipopolysaccharide injections, the vigorous proinflammatory cytokine response elicited was sufficient to produce a near-maximal HPA response, regardless of the presence or absence of GDF15. In contrast, the activation of the HPA axis seen in wild-type mice in response to the administration of genotoxic or endoplasmic reticulum toxins, which do not provoke a marked rise in cytokines, was absent in Gdf15 -/- mice. In conclusion, consistent with its proposed role as a sentinel hormone, endogenous GDF15 is required for the activation of the protective HPA response to toxins that do not induce a substantial cytokine response. In the context of efforts to develop GDF15 as an antiobesity therapeutic, these findings identify a biomarker of target engagement and a previously unrecognized pharmacodynamic effect, which will require monitoring in human studies

Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adult Patients: The UK-ROX Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance: Supplemental oxygen is frequently given to patients in intensive care units (ICUs); however, there is insufficient evidence to guide its therapeutic use and to minimize the potential harm caused by administering too little or too much. Objective: To determine whether reducing exposure to supplemental oxygen through a strategy of conservative oxygen therapy by using a peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo2) target of 90% (range, 88%-92%) reduces mortality at 90 days in mechanically ventilated adult patients receiving supplemental oxygen in the ICU. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial conducted in 97 ICUs in the UK including 16500 mechanically ventilated patients receiving supplemental oxygen. Participants were enrolled between May 2021 and November 2024. Follow-up was completed in February 2025. Interventions: Participants randomized to conservative oxygen therapy (n = 8258) received the lowest fraction of inspired oxygen possible to maintain their Spo2 at 90%. Participants randomized to usual oxygen therapy (n = 8242) received oxygen therapy at the discretion of the treating clinician. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included duration of ICU and acute hospital stay among survivors, days alive and free from organ support at 30 days, and mortality at other time points. Results: Of 16500 randomized patients, primary outcome data were available for 16394 (8211 in the conservative and 8183 in the usual oxygen therapy group). Randomized groups were similar (median age, 60 [IQR, 48-71] years and 38.2% females in both groups [n = 5652]). Exposure to supplemental oxygen was 29% lower for participants in the conservative oxygen therapy group compared with the usual oxygen therapy group. By 90 days, 2908 participants (35.4%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group had died compared with 2858 (34.9%) in the usual oxygen therapy group. After adjustment for prespecified baseline variables, the risk difference was 0.7 percentage points (95% CI, -0.7 to 2.0; P =.28). There were no significant differences in durations in ICU or hospital stay, days alive and free from organ support at 30 days, or mortality at other time points. Conclusions and Relevance: In adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen in the ICU, minimizing oxygen exposure through conservative oxygen therapy did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 90 days. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN13384956

Biomarker-Guided Antibiotic Duration for Hospitalized Patients With Suspected Sepsis

IMPORTANCE: For hospitalized critically ill adults with suspected sepsis, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) monitoring protocols can guide the duration of antibiotic therapy, but the evidence of the effect and safety of these protocols remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether decisions based on assessment of CRP or PCT safely results in a reduction in the duration of antibiotic therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, intervention-concealed randomized clinical trial, involving 2760 adults (≥18 years), in 41 UK National Health Service (NHS) intensive care units, requiring critical care within 24 hours of initiating intravenous antibiotics for suspected sepsis and likely to continue antibiotics for at least 72 hours. INTERVENTION: From January 1, 2018, to June 5, 2024, 918 patients were assigned to the daily PCT-guided protocol, 924 to the daily CRP-guided protocol, and 918 assigned to standard care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were total duration of antibiotics (effectiveness) and all-cause mortality (safety) to 28 days. Secondary outcomes included critical care unit data and hospital stay data. Ninety-day all-cause mortality was also collected. RESULTS: Among the randomized patients (mean age 60.2 [SD, 15.4] years; 60.3% males), there was a significant reduction in antibiotic duration from randomization to 28 days for those in the daily PCT-guided protocol compared with standard care (mean duration, 10.7 [SD, 7.6] days for standard care and 9.8 [SD, 7.2] days for PCT; mean difference, 0.88 days; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.58, P = .01). For all-cause mortality up to 28 days, the daily PCT-guided protocol was noninferior to standard care, where the noninferiority margin was set at 5.4% (19.4% [170 of 878] of patients receiving standard care; 20.9% [184 of 879], PCT; absolute difference, 1.57; 95% CI, −2.18 to 5.32; P = .02). No difference was found in antibiotic duration for standard care vs daily CRP-guided protocol (mean duration, 10.6 [7.7] days for CRP; mean difference, 0.09; 95% CI, −0.60 to 0.79; P = .79). For all-cause mortality, the daily CRP-guided protocol was inconclusive compared with standard care (21.1% [184 of 874] for CRP; absolute difference, 1.69; 95% CI, −2.07 to 5.45; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Care guided by measurement of PCT reduces antibiotic duration safely compared with standard care, but CRP does not. All-cause mortality for CRP was inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN4747324

Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adult Patients: The UK-ROX Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Supplemental oxygen is frequently given to patients in intensive care units (ICUs); however, there is insufficient evidence to guide its therapeutic use and to minimize the potential harm caused by administering too little or too much. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reducing exposure to supplemental oxygen through a strategy of conservative oxygen therapy by using a peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo2) target of 90% (range, 88%-92%) reduces mortality at 90 days in mechanically ventilated adult patients receiving supplemental oxygen in the ICU. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial conducted in 97 ICUs in the UK including 16 500 mechanically ventilated patients receiving supplemental oxygen. Participants were enrolled between May 2021 and November 2024. Follow-up was completed in February 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomized to conservative oxygen therapy (n = 8258) received the lowest fraction of inspired oxygen possible to maintain their Spo2 at 90%. Participants randomized to usual oxygen therapy (n = 8242) received oxygen therapy at the discretion of the treating clinician. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included duration of ICU and acute hospital stay among survivors, days alive and free from organ support at 30 days, and mortality at other time points. RESULTS: Of 16 500 randomized patients, primary outcome data were available for 16 394 (8211 in the conservative and 8183 in the usual oxygen therapy group). Randomized groups were similar (median age, 60 [IQR, 48-71] years and 38.2% females in both groups [n = 5652]). Exposure to supplemental oxygen was 29% lower for participants in the conservative oxygen therapy group compared with the usual oxygen therapy group. By 90 days, 2908 participants (35.4%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group had died compared with 2858 (34.9%) in the usual oxygen therapy group. After adjustment for prespecified baseline variables, the risk difference was 0.7 percentage points (95% CI, -0.7 to 2.0; P = .28). There were no significant differences in durations in ICU or hospital stay, days alive and free from organ support at 30 days, or mortality at other time points. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen in the ICU, minimizing oxygen exposure through conservative oxygen therapy did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 90 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN13384956

Prone positioning is associated with increased insulin requirements in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19

Stress hyperglycaemia is common in critical illness. We have previously observed that increasing severity of respiratory failure in patients with severe COVID-19 is associated with increased insulin demand. Given previously reported direct effects of hypoxia on insulin action, we reasoned that rapid improvements in oxygenation following prone positioning may improve insulin sensitivity and increase risk of hypoglycaemia. A retrospective multi-centre service evaluation comparing blood glucose and insulin administration in patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis receiving prone mechanical ventilation, comparing the 16 h pre-prone and 16 h post-prone time periods. 155 patients were included in this analysis. Oxygenation improved significantly following prone positioning (change in SpO2/FIO2 per hour prone: 3.01 ± 0.14, P < 0.0001). Glycaemic control was similar during the supine and prone study periods, and there were no hypoglycaemic events in the prone study period. Prone positioning was associated with an unexpected modest but significant increase in insulin requirements (mean difference in total insulin dose (IU): 8.32 ± 2.14, P < 0.001) that was robust to several sensitivity analyses, and could not be explained by changes in carbohydrate intake. We did not observe an increased rate of hypoglycaemia during prone ventilation and the adequacy of glycaemic control was comparable during the supine and prone study periods. Unexpectedly, prone ventilation was associated with an increase in insulin requirements despite significant improvement in hypoxaemia. Our findings support the safety of prone ventilation with respect to glycaemic control and identify a novel relationship between ventilation position and insulin requirements in critical illness

Repair of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in COVID-19 by Stromal Cells (REALIST-COVID Trial):A Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial

RationaleMesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may modulate inflammation, promoting repair in COVID-19-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).ObjectivesWe investigated safety and efficacy of ORBCEL-C (CD362-enriched, umbilical cord-derived MSCs) in COVID-related ARDS.MethodsThis multicentre, randomised, double-blind, allocation concealed, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03042143) randomised patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-related ARDS to receive ORBCEL-C (400million cells) or placebo (Plasma-Lyte148).MeasurementsThe primary safety and efficacy outcomes were incidence of serious adverse events and oxygenation index at day 7 respectively. Secondary outcomes included respiratory compliance, driving pressure, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SOFA score. Clinical outcomes relating to duration of ventilation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, and mortality were collected. Long-term follow up included diagnosis of interstitial lung disease at 1 year, and significant medical events and mortality at 2 years. Transcriptomic analysis was performed on whole blood at day 0, 4 and 7.Main results60 participants were recruited (final analysis n=30 ORBCEL-C, n=29 placebo: 1 in placebo group withdrew consent). 6 serious adverse events occurred in the ORBCEL-C and 3 in the placebo group, RR 2.9(0.6-13.2)p=0.25. Day 7 mean[SD] oxygenation index did not differ (ORBCEL-C 98.357.2], placebo 96.667.3). There were no differences in secondary surrogate outcomes, nor mortality at day 28, day 90, 1 or 2 years. There was no difference in prevalence of interstitial lung disease at 1year nor significant medical events up to 2 years. ORBCEL-C modulated the peripheral blood transcriptome.ConclusionORBCEL-C MSCs were safe in moderate-to-severe COVID-related ARDS, but did not improve surrogates of pulmonary organ dysfunction. Clinical trial registration available at www.Clinicaltrialsgov, ID: NCT03042143. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)