3 research outputs found
Importance of Triples Contributions to NMR Spin–Spin Coupling Constants Computed at the CC3 and CCSDT Levels
We
present the first analytical implementation of CC3 second derivatives
using the spin-unrestricted approach. This allows, for the first time,
the calculation of nuclear spin–spin coupling constants (SSCC)
relevant to NMR spectroscopy at the CC3 level of theory in a fully
analytical manner. CC3 results for the SSCCs of a number of small
molecules and their fluorine substituted derivatives are compared
with the corresponding coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD)
results obtained using specialized basis sets. For one-bond couplings
the change when going from CCSD to CC3 is typically 1–3%, but
much higher corrections were found for <sup>1</sup><i>J</i><sub>CN</sub> in FCN, 15.7%, and <sup>1</sup><i>J</i><sub>OF</sub> in OF<sub>2</sub>, 6.4%. The changes vary significantly
in the case of multibond couplings, with differences of up to 10%,
and even 13.6% for <sup>3</sup><i>J</i><sub>FH</sub> in
fluoroacetylene. Calculations at the coupled cluster singles, doubles,
and triples (CCSDT) level indicate that the most important contributions
arising from connected triple excitations in the coupled cluster expansion
are accounted for at the CC3 level. Thus, we believe that the CC3
method will become the standard approach for the calculation of reference
values of nuclear spin–spin coupling constants
NMR parameters of FNNF as a test for coupled-cluster methods: CCSDT shielding and CC3 spin–spin coupling
NMR shielding and spin-spin coupling constants of cis and trans isomers of FNNF have been determined to near-quantitative accuracy from ab initio calculations. The FNNF system, containing multiple N-F bonds and fluorine atoms, provides a severe test of computational methods. Coupled-cluster methods were used with large basis sets and complete basis set (CBS) extrapolations of the equilibrium geometry results, with vibrational and relativistic corrections. Shielding constants were calculated with basis sets as large as aug-cc-pCV7Z, together with coupled-cluster expansions up to CCSDT, at the all-electron CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pCVQZ optimized geometries. Spin-spin coupling constants have been determined with specialized versions of the correlation consistent basis sets ccJ-pVXZ, further augmented with diffuse functions. All-electron coupled-cluster methods up to CC3 were applied in these calculations. The results of this work highlight the application of state-of-the-art theoretical techniques, and provide the most accurate NMR properties of FNNF to date, which can serve to guide and supplement NMR experimentation.</p
On the convergence of zero-point vibrational corrections to nuclear shieldings and shielding anisotropies towards the complete basis set limit in water
<p>The method and basis set dependence of zero-point vibrational corrections (ZPVCs) to nuclear magnetic resonance shielding constants and anisotropies has been investigated using water as a test system. A systematic comparison has been made using the Hartree–Fock, second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD), coupled cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples corrections (CCSD(T)) and Kohn–Sham density functional theory with the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional methods in combination with the second-order vibrational perturbation theory (VPT2) approach for the vibrational corrections. As basis sets, the correlation consistent basis sets cc-pVXZ, aug-cc-pVXZ, cc-pCVXZ and aug-cc-pCVXZ with <i>X</i> = D, T, Q, 5, 6 and the polarisation consistent basis sets aug-pc-n and aug-pcS-n with <i>n</i> = 1, 2, 3, 4 were employed. Our results show that basis set convergence of the vibrational corrections is not monotonic and that very large basis sets are needed before a reasonable extrapolation to the basis set limit can be performed. Furthermore, our results suggest that coupled cluster methods and a decent basis set are required before the error of the electronic structure approach is lower than the inherent error of the VPT2 approximation.</p> <p></p
