27 research outputs found

    <i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes

    No full text
    Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results

    <i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes

    No full text
    Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results

    <i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes

    No full text
    Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results

    In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Lithiation–Delithiation Conversion Behavior of CuO/Graphene Anode

    No full text
    The electrochemical conversion behavior of metal oxides as well as its influence on the lithium-storage performance remains unclear. In this paper, we studied the dynamic electrochemical conversion process of CuO/graphene as anode by in situ transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic conversion behavior of the electrode was further correlated with its macroscopic lithium-storage properties. During the first lithiation, the porous CuO nanoparticles transformed to numerous Cu nanograins (2–3 nm) embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. The porous spaces were found to be favorable for accommodating the volume expansion during lithium insertion. Two types of irreversible processes were revealed during the lithiation–delithiation cycles. First, the nature of the charge–discharge process of CuO anode is a reversible phase conversion between Cu<sub>2</sub>O and Cu nanograins. The delithiation reaction cannot recover the electrode to its pristine structure (CuO), which is responsible for about ∼55% of the capacity fading in the first cycle. Second, there is a severe nanograin aggregation during the initial conversion cycles, which leads to low Coulombic efficiency. This finding could also account for the electrochemical behaviors of other transition metal oxide anodes that operate with similar electrochemical conversion mechanism

    <i>In Situ</i> Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of the Conversion Mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/Graphene Anode during Lithiation–Delithiation Processes

    No full text
    Transition metal oxides have attracted tremendous attention as anode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) recently. However, their electrochemical processes and fundamental mechanisms remain unclear. Here we report the direct observation of the dynamic behaviors and the conversion mechanism of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene in LIBs by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Upon lithiation, the Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles showed obvious volume expansion and morphological changes, and the surfaces of the electrode were covered by a nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. Single-crystalline Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were found to transform to multicrystalline nanoparticles consisting of many Fe nanograins embedded in Li<sub>2</sub>O matrix. Surprisingly, the delithiated product was not Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> but FeO, accounting for the irreversible electrochemical process and the large capacity fading of the anode material in the first cycle. The charge–discharge processes of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in LIBs are different from previously recognized mechanism, and are found to be a fully reversible electrochemical phase conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins accompanying the formation and disappearance of the Li<sub>2</sub>O layer. The macroscopic electrochemical performance of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/graphene was further correlated with the microcosmic <i>in situ</i> TEM results

    Synthesis of Porous NiO-Wrapped Graphene Nanosheets and Their Improved Lithium Storage Properties

    No full text
    This article reports a facile preparation of NiO–graphene composite by the combination of a solution-based method and subsequent annealing. X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy reveals that the graphene nanosheets are uniformly wrapped by porous NiO nanosheets in the product. The composite shows highly improved electrochemical performance as anode for Li–ion batteries (LIBs). The NiO–graphene nanosheets deliver a first discharge capacity of 2169.6 mAh g–1 and remain a reversible capacity up to 704.8 mAh g–1 after 50 cycles at a current of 200 mA g–1 in half cells. Contrarily, the pristine NiO nanosheets show only a reversible capacity of 134 mA g–1 after 50 cycles. The NiO–graphene composite also exhibits ameliorative rate capacity of 402.6 mAh g–1 at the current of 1600 mA g–1. In particular, these novel nanostructured composites show exceptional capacity retention in the assembled NiO–graphene/LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 full cell at different current density. The enhanced electrochemical performances are ascribed to the stable sheet-on-sheet architectures and the synergistic effects between the conductive graphene and thin porous NiO nanosheets

    In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of Electrochemical Behavior of CoS<sub>2</sub> in Lithium-Ion Battery

    No full text
    Metal sulfides are a type of potential anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, their electrochemical behaviors and mechanism during the charge and discharge process remain unclear. In the present paper, we use CoS<sub>2</sub> as a model material to investigate their electrochemical process using in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Two kinds of reaction behaviors are revealed. The pure CoS<sub>2</sub> particles show a side-to-side conversion process, in which large and anisotropic size expansion (47.1%) occurs that results in the formation of cracks and fractures in CoS<sub>2</sub> particles. In contrast, the CoS<sub>2</sub> particles anchored on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets exhibit a core–shell conversion process involving small and homogeneous size expansion (28.6%) and few fractures, which attributes to the excellent Li<sup>+</sup> conductivity of rGO sheets and accounts for the improved cyclability. Single-crystalline CoS<sub>2</sub> particle converts to Co nanocrystals of 1–2 nm embedded within Li<sub>2</sub>S matrix after the first lithiation. The subsequent electrochemical reaction is a reversible phase conversion between Co/Li<sub>2</sub>S and CoS<sub>2</sub> nanocrystals. Our direct observations provide important mechanistic insight for developing high-performance conversion electrodes for LIBs

    Lithiation Behavior of Individual Carbon-Coated Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Nanowire Observed by in Situ TEM

    No full text
    Fe3O4 nanowires, as a typical transition-metal oxide (TMO), are being considered as promising anodes for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) due to their 1D structure and high specific capacity. However, their underlying mechanism and electrochemical behaviors are still poorly understood. Here, the dynamic behavior and the electrochemical reaction of the carbon-coated Fe3O4 (Fe3O4@C) nanowire have been investigated directly through assembling a nanoscale LIBs inside transmission electron microscope (TEM). The in situ TEM results reveal that the Fe3O4 nanowires undergo cracking and fracturing upon the first lithiation, but the carbon coatings still embrace the oxide cores well after lithiation and play a role in maintaining the mechanical and electrical integrity. Meanwhile the lithiation process involves the conversion of Fe3O4 nanowires to Fe nanograins and the formation of Li2O along the lithium ions diffusion direction. The delithiated product is FeO rather than the original phase of Fe3O4 after the first delithiation process. This irreversible phase conversion may be a major cause of capacity fading of the electrode in the first cycle. As for the Fe3O4 electrode, about 78% of the capacity loss can be attributed to the irreversible phase reaction in the first cycle. During the subsequent lithiation-delithiation cycles, the Fe3O4 electrode shows a reversible conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins, accounting for the good reversibility of Fe3O4 anodes for LIBs. Our in situ results provide important insights into the electrochemical behavior and conversion mechanism of TMO-based anodes in LIBs and are helpful for designing LIBs with outstanding performance

    Lithiation Behavior of Individual Carbon-Coated Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Nanowire Observed by in Situ TEM

    No full text
    Fe3O4 nanowires, as a typical transition-metal oxide (TMO), are being considered as promising anodes for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) due to their 1D structure and high specific capacity. However, their underlying mechanism and electrochemical behaviors are still poorly understood. Here, the dynamic behavior and the electrochemical reaction of the carbon-coated Fe3O4 (Fe3O4@C) nanowire have been investigated directly through assembling a nanoscale LIBs inside transmission electron microscope (TEM). The in situ TEM results reveal that the Fe3O4 nanowires undergo cracking and fracturing upon the first lithiation, but the carbon coatings still embrace the oxide cores well after lithiation and play a role in maintaining the mechanical and electrical integrity. Meanwhile the lithiation process involves the conversion of Fe3O4 nanowires to Fe nanograins and the formation of Li2O along the lithium ions diffusion direction. The delithiated product is FeO rather than the original phase of Fe3O4 after the first delithiation process. This irreversible phase conversion may be a major cause of capacity fading of the electrode in the first cycle. As for the Fe3O4 electrode, about 78% of the capacity loss can be attributed to the irreversible phase reaction in the first cycle. During the subsequent lithiation-delithiation cycles, the Fe3O4 electrode shows a reversible conversion between Fe and FeO nanograins, accounting for the good reversibility of Fe3O4 anodes for LIBs. Our in situ results provide important insights into the electrochemical behavior and conversion mechanism of TMO-based anodes in LIBs and are helpful for designing LIBs with outstanding performance

    Li<sub>0.35</sub>La<sub>0.55</sub>TiO<sub>3</sub> Nanofibers Enhanced Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Composite Polymer Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Batteries

    No full text
    Using polymer electrolytes with relatively high mechanical strength, enhanced safety, and excellent flexibility to replace the conventional liquid electrolytes is an effective strategy to curb the Li-dendrite growth in Li-metal batteries (LMBs). However, low ionic conductivity, unsatisfactory thermal stability, and narrow electrochemical window still hinder their applications. Here, we fabricate Li0.35La0.55TiO3 (LLTO) nanofiber-enabled poly­(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)-based composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) with enhanced mechanical property and wide electrochemical window. The results show that 15 wt % of LLTO nanofibers synergize with PVDF, giving a flexible electrolyte membrane with significantly improved performance, such as high ionic conductivity (5.3 × 10–4 S cm–1), wide electrochemical window (5.1 V), high mechanical strength (stress 9.5 MPa, strain 341%), and good thermal stability (thermal degradation 410 °C). In addition, an all-solid-state Li-metal battery of sandwich-type LiFePO4/PVDF–CPE (15 wt % of LLTO)/Li delivers satisfactory cycling stability and outstanding rate performance. A reversible capacity of 121 mA h g–1 is delivered at 1 C after 100 cycles. This work exemplifies that the introduction of LLTO nanofibers can improve the electrochemical performances of PVDF-based CPEs used as electrolytes for all-solid-state LMBs
    corecore