Table3_Gene Expression Profile Reveals a Prognostic Signature of Non–MSI-H/pMMR Colorectal Cancer.XLSX

Studies have demonstrated that non–MSI-H/pMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis and relapse rate than microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) CRC. Hence, searching for a novel tool to advance the prognostic management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC is vital. In this study, using three independent public cohorts and a clinical in-house cohort, we developed and validated a microsatellite stable–associated signature (MSSAS). The initial signature establishment was performed in GSE39582 (n = 454). This was followed by independent validation of this signature in The Cancer Genome Atlas–CRC (n = 312), GSE39084 (n = 54), and in-house cohort (n = 146). As a result, MSSAS was proven to be an independent risk factor for overall survival and relapse-free survival in non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that MSSAS had a stable and accurate performance in all cohorts for 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Further analysis suggested that MSSAS performed better than age, gender, and the T, N, M, and AJCC stages, adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor mutation burden, neoantigen, and TP53, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations. The clinical validation was executed to further ensure the robustness and clinical feasibility of this signature. In conclusion, MSSAS might be a robust and promising biomarker for advancing clinical management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC.</p

Table4_Gene Expression Profile Reveals a Prognostic Signature of Non–MSI-H/pMMR Colorectal Cancer.XLSX

Studies have demonstrated that non–MSI-H/pMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis and relapse rate than microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) CRC. Hence, searching for a novel tool to advance the prognostic management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC is vital. In this study, using three independent public cohorts and a clinical in-house cohort, we developed and validated a microsatellite stable–associated signature (MSSAS). The initial signature establishment was performed in GSE39582 (n = 454). This was followed by independent validation of this signature in The Cancer Genome Atlas–CRC (n = 312), GSE39084 (n = 54), and in-house cohort (n = 146). As a result, MSSAS was proven to be an independent risk factor for overall survival and relapse-free survival in non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that MSSAS had a stable and accurate performance in all cohorts for 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Further analysis suggested that MSSAS performed better than age, gender, and the T, N, M, and AJCC stages, adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor mutation burden, neoantigen, and TP53, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations. The clinical validation was executed to further ensure the robustness and clinical feasibility of this signature. In conclusion, MSSAS might be a robust and promising biomarker for advancing clinical management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC.</p

Table1_Gene Expression Profile Reveals a Prognostic Signature of Non–MSI-H/pMMR Colorectal Cancer.DOCX

Studies have demonstrated that non–MSI-H/pMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis and relapse rate than microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) CRC. Hence, searching for a novel tool to advance the prognostic management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC is vital. In this study, using three independent public cohorts and a clinical in-house cohort, we developed and validated a microsatellite stable–associated signature (MSSAS). The initial signature establishment was performed in GSE39582 (n = 454). This was followed by independent validation of this signature in The Cancer Genome Atlas–CRC (n = 312), GSE39084 (n = 54), and in-house cohort (n = 146). As a result, MSSAS was proven to be an independent risk factor for overall survival and relapse-free survival in non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that MSSAS had a stable and accurate performance in all cohorts for 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Further analysis suggested that MSSAS performed better than age, gender, and the T, N, M, and AJCC stages, adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor mutation burden, neoantigen, and TP53, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations. The clinical validation was executed to further ensure the robustness and clinical feasibility of this signature. In conclusion, MSSAS might be a robust and promising biomarker for advancing clinical management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC.</p

Table2_Gene Expression Profile Reveals a Prognostic Signature of Non–MSI-H/pMMR Colorectal Cancer.XLSX

Studies have demonstrated that non–MSI-H/pMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis and relapse rate than microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) CRC. Hence, searching for a novel tool to advance the prognostic management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC is vital. In this study, using three independent public cohorts and a clinical in-house cohort, we developed and validated a microsatellite stable–associated signature (MSSAS). The initial signature establishment was performed in GSE39582 (n = 454). This was followed by independent validation of this signature in The Cancer Genome Atlas–CRC (n = 312), GSE39084 (n = 54), and in-house cohort (n = 146). As a result, MSSAS was proven to be an independent risk factor for overall survival and relapse-free survival in non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that MSSAS had a stable and accurate performance in all cohorts for 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Further analysis suggested that MSSAS performed better than age, gender, and the T, N, M, and AJCC stages, adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor mutation burden, neoantigen, and TP53, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations. The clinical validation was executed to further ensure the robustness and clinical feasibility of this signature. In conclusion, MSSAS might be a robust and promising biomarker for advancing clinical management of non–MSI-H/pMMR CRC.</p

Image_3_LncRNA profiles from Notch signaling: Implications for clinical management and tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer.tif

The interplay between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the Notch pathway involves a variety of malignancies. However, Notch-derived lncRNAs and their latent clinical significance remain elusive in colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we introduced a framework that could screen Notch-derived lncRNAs (named “NLncer”) and ultimately identified 24 NLncers. To further explore the clinical significance of these NLncers, we performed LASSO and Cox regression in TCGA-CRC cohort (n = 584) and then retained six lncRNAs tightly associated with prognosis. The final model (termed “NLncS”) was subsequently tested in GSE38832 (n = 122), GSE39582 (n = 573), and an in-house clinical cohort (n = 115). Ultimately, our NLncS model could serve as an independent risk factor and afford a robust performance for assessing the prognosis of CRC patients. Additionally, patients with high NLncS risk scores were characterized by upregulation of immune pathways, strong immunogenicity, abundant CD8 + T-cell infiltration, and potentially higher response rates to CTLA4 blockers, which turned out to be suitable for immunotherapy. Aiming at globally observing the characteristics of high-risk patients, somatic mutation and methylation modification analysis provide us with evidence at the genomic and transcriptomic levels. To facilitate the clinical transformability, we mined deeply into the sensitive compounds targeting high-risk individuals and identified dasatinib as a candidate agent for patients with a high Notch risk score. In conclusion, our NLncS model is a promising biomarker for optimizing the clinical management of CRC patients.</p

DataSheet_1_LncRNA profiles from Notch signaling: Implications for clinical management and tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer.xlsx

The interplay between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the Notch pathway involves a variety of malignancies. However, Notch-derived lncRNAs and their latent clinical significance remain elusive in colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we introduced a framework that could screen Notch-derived lncRNAs (named “NLncer”) and ultimately identified 24 NLncers. To further explore the clinical significance of these NLncers, we performed LASSO and Cox regression in TCGA-CRC cohort (n = 584) and then retained six lncRNAs tightly associated with prognosis. The final model (termed “NLncS”) was subsequently tested in GSE38832 (n = 122), GSE39582 (n = 573), and an in-house clinical cohort (n = 115). Ultimately, our NLncS model could serve as an independent risk factor and afford a robust performance for assessing the prognosis of CRC patients. Additionally, patients with high NLncS risk scores were characterized by upregulation of immune pathways, strong immunogenicity, abundant CD8 + T-cell infiltration, and potentially higher response rates to CTLA4 blockers, which turned out to be suitable for immunotherapy. Aiming at globally observing the characteristics of high-risk patients, somatic mutation and methylation modification analysis provide us with evidence at the genomic and transcriptomic levels. To facilitate the clinical transformability, we mined deeply into the sensitive compounds targeting high-risk individuals and identified dasatinib as a candidate agent for patients with a high Notch risk score. In conclusion, our NLncS model is a promising biomarker for optimizing the clinical management of CRC patients.</p

Image_2_LncRNA profiles from Notch signaling: Implications for clinical management and tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer.tif

The interplay between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the Notch pathway involves a variety of malignancies. However, Notch-derived lncRNAs and their latent clinical significance remain elusive in colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we introduced a framework that could screen Notch-derived lncRNAs (named “NLncer”) and ultimately identified 24 NLncers. To further explore the clinical significance of these NLncers, we performed LASSO and Cox regression in TCGA-CRC cohort (n = 584) and then retained six lncRNAs tightly associated with prognosis. The final model (termed “NLncS”) was subsequently tested in GSE38832 (n = 122), GSE39582 (n = 573), and an in-house clinical cohort (n = 115). Ultimately, our NLncS model could serve as an independent risk factor and afford a robust performance for assessing the prognosis of CRC patients. Additionally, patients with high NLncS risk scores were characterized by upregulation of immune pathways, strong immunogenicity, abundant CD8 + T-cell infiltration, and potentially higher response rates to CTLA4 blockers, which turned out to be suitable for immunotherapy. Aiming at globally observing the characteristics of high-risk patients, somatic mutation and methylation modification analysis provide us with evidence at the genomic and transcriptomic levels. To facilitate the clinical transformability, we mined deeply into the sensitive compounds targeting high-risk individuals and identified dasatinib as a candidate agent for patients with a high Notch risk score. In conclusion, our NLncS model is a promising biomarker for optimizing the clinical management of CRC patients.</p

Image_1_LncRNA profiles from Notch signaling: Implications for clinical management and tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer.tif

The interplay between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the Notch pathway involves a variety of malignancies. However, Notch-derived lncRNAs and their latent clinical significance remain elusive in colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we introduced a framework that could screen Notch-derived lncRNAs (named “NLncer”) and ultimately identified 24 NLncers. To further explore the clinical significance of these NLncers, we performed LASSO and Cox regression in TCGA-CRC cohort (n = 584) and then retained six lncRNAs tightly associated with prognosis. The final model (termed “NLncS”) was subsequently tested in GSE38832 (n = 122), GSE39582 (n = 573), and an in-house clinical cohort (n = 115). Ultimately, our NLncS model could serve as an independent risk factor and afford a robust performance for assessing the prognosis of CRC patients. Additionally, patients with high NLncS risk scores were characterized by upregulation of immune pathways, strong immunogenicity, abundant CD8 + T-cell infiltration, and potentially higher response rates to CTLA4 blockers, which turned out to be suitable for immunotherapy. Aiming at globally observing the characteristics of high-risk patients, somatic mutation and methylation modification analysis provide us with evidence at the genomic and transcriptomic levels. To facilitate the clinical transformability, we mined deeply into the sensitive compounds targeting high-risk individuals and identified dasatinib as a candidate agent for patients with a high Notch risk score. In conclusion, our NLncS model is a promising biomarker for optimizing the clinical management of CRC patients.</p

Image_2_ALOX12: A Novel Insight in Bevacizumab Response, Immunotherapy Effect, and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer.jpeg

Colorectal cancer is a highly malignant cancer with poor prognosis and mortality rates. As the first biological agent approved for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), bevacizumab was confirmed to exhibit good performance when combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, the efficacy of both bevacizumab and immunotherapy is highly heterogeneous across CRC patients with different stages. Thus, exploring a novel biomarker to comprehensively assess the prognosis and bevacizumab and immunotherapy response of CRC is of great significance. In our study, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to identify bevacizumab-related genes. After verification in four public cohorts and our internal cohort, ALOX12 was identified as a key gene related to bevacizumab response. Prognostic analysis and in vitro experiments further demonstrated that ALOX12 was closely associated with the prognosis, tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Multi-omics data analysis based on mutation and copy number variation (CNV) revealed that RYR3 drove the expression of ALOX12 and the deletion of 17p12 inhibited ALOX12 expression, respectively. Moreover, we interrogated the relationship between ALOX12 and immune cells and checkpoints. The results exhibited that high ALOX12 expression predicted a higher immune infiltration and better immunotherapy response, which was further validated in Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) and Subclass Mapping (SubMap) methods. Above all, our study provides a stable biomarker for clinical protocol optimization, prognostic assessment, precise treatment, and individualized treatment of CRC.</p

Image_3_ALOX12: A Novel Insight in Bevacizumab Response, Immunotherapy Effect, and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer.jpeg

Colorectal cancer is a highly malignant cancer with poor prognosis and mortality rates. As the first biological agent approved for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), bevacizumab was confirmed to exhibit good performance when combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, the efficacy of both bevacizumab and immunotherapy is highly heterogeneous across CRC patients with different stages. Thus, exploring a novel biomarker to comprehensively assess the prognosis and bevacizumab and immunotherapy response of CRC is of great significance. In our study, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to identify bevacizumab-related genes. After verification in four public cohorts and our internal cohort, ALOX12 was identified as a key gene related to bevacizumab response. Prognostic analysis and in vitro experiments further demonstrated that ALOX12 was closely associated with the prognosis, tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Multi-omics data analysis based on mutation and copy number variation (CNV) revealed that RYR3 drove the expression of ALOX12 and the deletion of 17p12 inhibited ALOX12 expression, respectively. Moreover, we interrogated the relationship between ALOX12 and immune cells and checkpoints. The results exhibited that high ALOX12 expression predicted a higher immune infiltration and better immunotherapy response, which was further validated in Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) and Subclass Mapping (SubMap) methods. Above all, our study provides a stable biomarker for clinical protocol optimization, prognostic assessment, precise treatment, and individualized treatment of CRC.</p