27 research outputs found

    Dynamics of generalized tachyon field

    Full text link
    We investigate the dynamics of generalized tachyon field in FRW spacetime. We obtain the autonomous dynamical system for the general case. Because the general autonomous dynamical system cannot be solved analytically, we discuss two cases in detail: β=1\beta=1 and β=2\beta=2. We find the critical points and study their stability. At these critical points, we also consider the stability of the generalized tachyon field, which is as important as the stability of critical points. The possible final states of the universe are discussed.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figures, published versio

    Ultra-compact structure in intermediate-luminosity radio quasars: building a sample of standard cosmological rulers and improving the dark energy constraints up to z∼3z\sim 3

    Full text link
    In this paper, we present a new compiled milliarcsecond compact radio data set of 120 intermediate-luminosity quasars in the redshift range 0.46<z<2.760.46< z <2.76. These quasars show negligible dependence on redshifts and intrinsic luminosity, and thus represents, in the standard model of cosmology, a fixed comoving-length of standard ruler. We implement a new cosmology-independent technique to calibrate the linear size of of this standard ruler as lm=11.03±0.25l_m= 11.03\pm0.25 pc, which is the typical radius at which AGN jets become opaque at the observed frequency ν∼2\nu\sim 2 GHz. In the framework of flat Λ\LambdaCDM model, we find a high value of the matter density parameter, Ωm=0.322−0.141+0.244\Omega_m=0.322^{+0.244}_{-0.141}, and a low value of the Hubble constant, H0=67.6−7.4+7.8  kms−1Mpc−1H_0=67.6^{+7.8}_{-7.4}\; \rm{kms}^{-1}\rm{Mpc}^{-1}, which is in excellent agreement with the CMB anisotropy measurements by \textit{Planck}. We obtain Ωm=0.309−0.151+0.215{\Omega_m}=0.309^{+0.215}_{-0.151}, w=−0.970−1.730+0.500w=-0.970^{+0.500}_{-1.730} at 68.3% CL for the constant ww of a dynamical dark-energy model, which demonstrates no significant deviation from the concordance Λ\LambdaCDM model. Consistent fitting results are also obtained for other cosmological models explaining the cosmic acceleration, like Ricci dark energy (RDE) or Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) brane-world scenario. While no significant change in ww with redshift is detected, there is still considerable room for evolution in ww and the transition redshift at which ww departing from -1 is located at z∼2.0z\sim 2.0. Our results demonstrate that the method extensively investigated in our work on observational radio quasar data can be used to effectively derive cosmological information. Finally, we find the combination of high-redshift quasars and low-redshift clusters may provide an important source of angular diameter distances, considering the redshift coverage of these two astrophysical probes.Comment: 36 pages, 5 tables, 16 figures, A&A, in pres

    Testing and selecting cosmological models with ultra-compact radio quasars

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we place constraints on four alternative cosmological models under the assumption of the spatial flatness of the Universe: CPL, EDE, GCG and MPC. A new compilation of 120 compact radio quasars observed by very-long-baseline interferometry, which represents a type of new cosmological standard rulers, are used to test these cosmological models. Our results show that the fits on CPL obtained from the quasar sample are well consistent with those obtained from BAO. For other cosmological models considered, quasars provide constraints in agreement with those derived with other standard probes at 1σ1\sigma confidence level. Moreover, the results obtained from other statistical methods including Figure of Merit, Om(z)Om(z) and statefinder diagnostics indicate that: (1) Radio quasar standard ruler could provide better statistical constraints than BAO for all cosmological models considered, which suggests its potential to act as a powerful complementary probe to BAO and galaxy clusters. (2) Turning to Om(z)Om(z) diagnostics, CPL, GCG and EDE models can not be distinguished from each other at the present epoch. (3) In the framework of statefinder diagnostics, MPC and EDE will deviate from Λ\rm{\Lambda}CDM model in the near future, while GCG model cannot be distinguished from Λ\rm{\Lambda}CDM model unless much higher precision observations are available.Comment: 12 pages, 8 figures, 1 tabl
    corecore