What's the Problem? Cultural Capability and Learning from Historical Performance

Contains the cis-eQTLs with P value < 5 % for T-cells obtained from early undifferentiated arthritis patients. (TXT 1162 kb

Peter Tatchell - Directed by Peter Fraser.mp4

This film was made as part of the ReelLives research project which explores our digital identity.  Six short films were commissioned which were made entirely from the subject's social media data and allowed us to think about who we are online.  Peter Tatchell was directed by Peter Fraser.<div><br></div><div>The research was covered by University of Birmingham Research Ethics Committee ERN_15-0572. To adhere to ethical guidelines, all data used was approved by the participants.</div

Mean values and (standard deviations) for range of motion of the rider’s center of pressure (COP) in walk, trot and canter.

Mean values and (standard deviations) for range of motion of the rider’s center of pressure (COP) in walk, trot and canter.</p

Mean values and (standard deviations) of speeds and stride lengths for horses performing collected and extended walk, trot, and canter.

<p>Mean values and (standard deviations) of speeds and stride lengths for horses performing collected and extended walk, trot, and canter.</p

Different saddle flap configurations.

<p>Top: conventional saddle with two flaps showing the outer flap (left) and outer flap raised to show the underlying sweat flap and girth tabs (right). Middle: monoflap saddle showing the outer surface of the flap (left) and with the flap raised (right). Bottom: flapless saddle without pad (left) and with pad (right).</p

Typical center of pressure tracings for one horse-rider combination moving on a straight line.

<p>Data are shown for walk (top two rows), trot (middle two rows) and canter (bottom two rows) using a conventional saddle (left) and a flapless saddle (right).</p

Additional file 1: of Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

Schematics of in-solution ligation and in-nucleus ligation Hi-C experimental protocols. (PDF 746 kb

Additional file 2: of Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

Assessing randomness of hybrid di-tags. (PDF 52 kb

Simulation results for 2D case.

<p>(<b>A</b>) One example of co-localization ratio convergence. The ratio rapidly becomes stable as time increases. Yellow triangle is obtained from Eq. (15), showing the consistency of calculation of co-localization ratio using different variables. (<b>B</b>) The inter-co-localization (ICI) interval distribution for <i>T_c,xx</i> and <i>T_c,xy</i>. The parameters are the same as displayed in (A). The inter-co-localization interval distribution can be fitted with gamma distributions. (<b>C</b>) The mean values of ICI distribution by varying the factor number and binding time between genes and factors. The mean ICI increases as the binding time increases, and decreases as the factor number increases. (<b>D</b>) The co-localization probability for X-X gene and X-Y gene. (<b>E</b>) Co-localization ratio for various combinations of factor number and binding time. The ratio threshold is set to be 0.52. The red dashed curve is the threshold boundary to distinguish whether the co-localization is significant or tends to be random.</p

Amplitude modulation and frequency modulation of factor number.

<p>(<b>A</b>) Illustration of transcription factor translocation into and out of the nucleus. (<b>B</b>) The burst of factor nuclear localization under the frequency of 0.15(min⁻¹) The red dash line represents the average factor number over each period. (<b>C</b>) The normalized expression level of X₁ gene and X₂ gene versus factor number (amplitude modulation). (<b>D</b>) The normalized expression level of X₁ gene and X₂ gene versus burst frequency of factor (frequency modulation). (<b>E</b>) X gene and Y gene co-localization ratio versus burst frequency of X transcription factor.</p