3 research outputs found

    SN1987A neutrino burst: limits on flavor conversion

    Full text link
    In this paper, we revisit the SN1987A neutrino data to see its constraints on flavor conversion. We are motivated by the fact that most works that analyze this data consider a specific conversion mechanism, such as the MSW (Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein) effect, although flavor conversion is still an open question in supernovae due to the presence of neutrino-neutrino interactions. In our analysis, instead of considering a specific conversion mechanism, we let the electron antineutrino survival probability Pe‾e‾P_{\overline{e}\overline{e}} be a free parameter. We fit the data from Kamiokande-II, Baksan, and IMB detected spectrum with two classes of models: time-integrated and time-dependent. For the time-integrated model, it is not possible to put limits above 1σ1\sigma (68% confidence level) on the survival probability. The same happens for the time-dependent model when cooling is the only mechanism of antineutrino emission. However, for models considering an accretion phase, Pe‾e‾∼0P_{\overline{e}\overline{e}}\sim0 is strongly rejected, showing a preference for the existence of an accretion component in the detected antineutrino flux, and a preference for normal mass ordering when only the MSW is present.Comment: 13 pages,10 figures. Version Accepted for publication. Some updates were made in the analysis with no significant deviations from previous result

    On the Effects of Quantum Decoherence in a Future Supernova Neutrino Detection

    Full text link
    Quantum decoherence effects in neutrinos, described by the open quantum systems formalism, serve as a gateway to explore potential new physics, including quantum gravity. Previous research extensively investigated these effects across various neutrino sources, imposing stringent constraints on the spontaneous loss of coherence. In this study, we demonstrate that even within the Supernovae environment, where neutrinos are released as incoherent states, quantum decoherence could influence the flavor equipartition of 3ν3\nu mixing. Additionally, we examine the potential energy dependence of quantum decoherence parameters (Γ=Γ0(E/E0)n\Gamma = \Gamma_0 (E/E_0)^n) with different power laws (n=0,2,5/2n = 0, 2, 5/2). Our findings indicate that future-generation detectors (DUNE, Hyper-K, and JUNO) can significantly constrain quantum decoherence effects under different scenarios. For a Supernova located 10 kpc away from Earth, DUNE could potentially establish 3σ3\sigma bounds of Γ≤6.2×10−14\Gamma \leq 6.2 \times 10^{-14} eV in the normal mass hierarchy (NH) scenario, while Hyper-K could impose a 2σ2\sigma limit of Γ≤3.6×10−14\Gamma \leq 3.6 \times 10^{-14} eV for the inverted mass hierarchy (IH) scenario with n=0n=0 - assuming no energy exchange between the neutrino subsystem and non-standard environment ([H,Vp]=0[H,V_p] = 0). These limits become even more restrictive for a closer Supernova. When we relax the assumption of energy exchange ([H,Vp]≠0[H,V_p] \neq 0), for a 10 kpc SN, DUNE can establish a 3σ3\sigma limit of Γ8≤4.2×10−28\Gamma_8 \leq 4.2 \times 10^{-28} eV for NH, while Hyper-K could constrain Γ8≤1.3×10−27\Gamma_8 \leq 1.3 \times 10^{-27} eV for IH (n=0n=0) with 2σ2\sigma, representing the most stringent bounds reported to date. Furthermore, we examine the impact of neutrino loss during propagation for future Supernova detection

    SN1987A neutrino burst: limits on flavor conversion

    No full text
    Abstract In this paper, we revisit the SN1987A neutrino data to see its constraints on flavor conversion. We are motivated by the fact that most works that analyze this data consider a specific conversion mechanism, such as the MSW (Mikheyev–Smirnov–Wolfenstein) effect, although flavor conversion is still an open question in supernovae due to the presence of neutrino–neutrino interactions. In our analysis, instead of considering a specific conversion mechanism, we let the electron antineutrino survival probability Pe‾e‾P_{{\overline{e}}{\overline{e}}} P e ¯ e ¯ be a free parameter. We fit the data from Kamiokande-II, Baksan, and IMB detected spectrum with two classes of models: time-integrated and time-dependent. For the time-integrated model, it is not possible to put limits above 1σ1\sigma 1 σ (68% confidence level) on the survival probability. The same happens for the time-dependent model when cooling is the only mechanism of antineutrino emission. However, for models considering an accretion phase, Pe‾e‾∼0P_{{\overline{e}}{\overline{e}}}\sim 0 P e ¯ e ¯ ∼ 0 is strongly rejected, showing a preference for the existence of an accretion component in the detected antineutrino flux, and a preference for normal mass ordering when only the MSW is present
    corecore