22 research outputs found

    ROC comparison between three prediction models for both readers.

    No full text
    AUC is increased by adding parameters to standard MRI. The 1st model: standard MRI alone, the 2nd model: standard MRI with posttreatment 2D ADCmean, the 3rd model: standard MRI with posttreatment 2D ADCmean and posttreatment 3D ADCskewness. post- = posttreatment; 2D = single-section ROI; 3D = whole-tumor volume; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; AUC = areas under the curve.</p

    MRI of osteoblastic and chondroblastic osteosarcoma, lack of pretreatment DWI, indicating that ADC values derived from whole-tumor volume can reinforce diagnostic ability.

    No full text
    (A) Axial fat-suppressed (FS) contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (T1WI) before treatment shows a tumor with extraosseous lesion (thick arrow) in distal femur. (B) Axial FS contrast-enhanced T1WI after treatment shows slight decrease in extraosseous tumor size (thick arrow), interpreted as equivocal in reader 1. (C) DWI (b of 800 sec/mm2) with ADC map after treatment shows 2D ADCminimum and 2D ADCmean of 1235μm2/sec and 1968μm2/sec, respectively. Posttreatment values are also equivocal because of neighboring cutoff values and lack of pretreatment DWI. (D) ADC histogram derived from whole-tumor volume after treatment shows 3D ADCmean of 1864μm2/sec, 3D ADCskewness of 0.185, and 3D ADCkurtosis of 4.14, suggesting a poor responder. The histopathologic finding demonstrates a poor treatment response (necrosis = 70%).</p

    Bland-Altman plots of ADC measurements derived from single-section ROIs between two readers.

    No full text
    (A) pretreatment 2D ADCminimum, (B) posttreatment 2D ADCminimum, (C) pretreatment 2D ADCmean, and (D) posttreatment 2D ADCmean. The unit of ADC is μm2/sec. pre- = pretreatment; post- = posttreatment; ADCmin = ADCminimum.</p
    corecore