Table_1_Trends in the Incidence and Survival Rates of Primary Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Compared to Ovarian Serous Carcinoma in Korea.docx

ObjectiveTo compare the incidence and survival rates of primary ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC) from a nationwide collected database.MethodsWe extracted information of patients with primary OCCC and OSC from the Korea Central Cancer Registry recorded between 1999 and 2018, including age at diagnosis and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results summary stage. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated. Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared between the OCCC and OSC groups.ResultsOverall, the incidence rate of primary OCCC increased markedly from 1999 (ASR, 0.16/100,000) to 2018 (0.76/100,000) (APC, 7.85%; PConclusionsOur nationwide registry-based study demonstrated that the incidence of OCCC in Korea increased significantly from 1999 to 2018. Early-stage OCCC had a relatively good prognosis, but advanced-stage OCCC had a worse OS than advanced-stage OSC. Therefore, the development of optimal treatment strategies for OCCC is warranted.</p

Table_1_Characteristics of second primary breast cancer after ovarian cancer: a Korea central cancer registry retrospective study.docx

BackgroundSecond primary cancer has become an important issue among cancer survivors. This study sought to determine the differences in clinicopathologic outcomes between second primary breast cancer (SPBC) after ovarian cancer and primary breast cancer (PBC) in the Republic of Korea.Methods and materialsWe searched the Korea Central Cancer Registry and identified 251,244 breast cancer cases that were diagnosed between 1999 and 2017. The incident rate and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) were calculated. Demographic and clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated according to age, histological type, and cancer stage.ResultsAmong the 228,329 patients included, 228,148 were patients with PBC, and 181 patients had SPBC diagnosed after ovarian cancer (OC). The mean ages at diagnosis were 56.09 ± 10.81 years for SPBC and 50.65 ± 11.40 years for PBC. Patients with SPBC were significantly less likely than patients with PBC to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (14.92% vs. 21.92%, p = 0.02) or adjuvant chemotherapy (44.75% vs. 55.69%, p ConclusionThe incidence of breast cancer is about 1.27 times higher in ovarian cancer patients than in healthy people. The survival outcomes were worse for SPBC than for PBC and were related to older age and advanced stage. Active screening for breast cancer is necessary in ovarian cancer patients.</p

Additional file 2 of Clinical implications of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 1. Comparisons of survival outcomes by residual tumor after surgery in histological subgroups. (A) Progression-free survival and (B) overall survival in patients with the endometrioid histological subtype; (C) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival in those with the non-endometrioid histological subtype. Abbreviations: NGR, no gross residual; RT, residual tumor; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OS, overall survival

Additional file 1 of Clinical implications of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1. Brief review of clinical courses of all patients. Abbreviations: NAC, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; IDS, Interval debulking surgery; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OS, overall survival. Abbreviations: NGR, no gross residual; RT, residual tumor; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OS, overall survival

Table_1_Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker for monitoring and predicting paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with gynecological cancers.pdf

ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the potential of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF) as reliable biomarkers for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN).MethodsForty-eight patients with gynecologic cancer scheduled to undergo six cycles of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center of Korea between September 2020 and January 2022 were prospectively assessed during and after chemotherapy.ResultsAt the end of the chemotherapy, 12 (25%) patients were classified as having grade 3 PIPN according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria. The sNfL levels increased during paclitaxel treatment in all patients. After two, four, and six cycles, patients with grade 3 PIPN exhibited higher mean sNfL levels than those in the 0–2 grade range (p = 0.004, p = 001, and p ConclusionsThe sNfL levels during paclitaxel-based chemotherapy reflect ongoing neuroaxonal injury and serve as reliable biomarkers of PIPN severity. The sNfL levels during early treatment with paclitaxel might be prognostic indicators for PIPN progression. Low sBDNF levels 6 months after chemotherapy might adversely affect PIPN recovery.</p

DataSheet_1_Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker for monitoring and predicting paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with gynecological cancers.pdf

ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the potential of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF) as reliable biomarkers for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN).MethodsForty-eight patients with gynecologic cancer scheduled to undergo six cycles of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center of Korea between September 2020 and January 2022 were prospectively assessed during and after chemotherapy.ResultsAt the end of the chemotherapy, 12 (25%) patients were classified as having grade 3 PIPN according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria. The sNfL levels increased during paclitaxel treatment in all patients. After two, four, and six cycles, patients with grade 3 PIPN exhibited higher mean sNfL levels than those in the 0–2 grade range (p = 0.004, p = 001, and p ConclusionsThe sNfL levels during paclitaxel-based chemotherapy reflect ongoing neuroaxonal injury and serve as reliable biomarkers of PIPN severity. The sNfL levels during early treatment with paclitaxel might be prognostic indicators for PIPN progression. Low sBDNF levels 6 months after chemotherapy might adversely affect PIPN recovery.</p

Additional file 1 of Surgical outcomes of ureteral reconstruction during cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Additional file 1: Table S1. Review of surgical outcomes of urinary tract resection

Characteristics of the included studies.

ObjectivesThis meta-analysis was undertaken to systematically evaluate the effects of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy on the survival of newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.Methods/MaterialsA systematic literature search revealed 3,227 studies. A subsequent selection process identified seven suitable randomized studies that assessed the survival outcomes in newly diagnosed advanced EOC patients administered PARPi (n = 1921; the PARPi group) or placebo (n = 1150; the placebo group). The survival outcomes were compared with respect to the PARPi treatment regardless of bevacizumab maintenance therapy. All adverse events ≥ grade 3 were analyzed. Review Manager Version 5.4.1 software was used for the meta-analysis.ResultsThe two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in the PARPi group than the placebo (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.68). Furthermore, patients in the PARPi group with the BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm), BRCA wild type, homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD), or HRD without BRCAm, but not with homologous-recombination proficiency had a significantly better two-year PFS than the patients in the placebo group. The five-year overall survival (OS) was comparable in the two groups, but patients in the PARPi group with BRCAm had a significantly better five-year OS than those in the placebo group (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.74). In addition, the adverse event rate (≥ grade 3) was significantly higher in the PARPi group than in the placebo group (HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.13 to 7.63).ConclusionsIn patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC, PARPi maintenance therapy was significantly more effective in terms of survival than no PARPi treatment. However, the risk of serious adverse events was higher for patients who received PARPi maintenance therapy.</div

Two-year PFS.

ObjectivesThis meta-analysis was undertaken to systematically evaluate the effects of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy on the survival of newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.Methods/MaterialsA systematic literature search revealed 3,227 studies. A subsequent selection process identified seven suitable randomized studies that assessed the survival outcomes in newly diagnosed advanced EOC patients administered PARPi (n = 1921; the PARPi group) or placebo (n = 1150; the placebo group). The survival outcomes were compared with respect to the PARPi treatment regardless of bevacizumab maintenance therapy. All adverse events ≥ grade 3 were analyzed. Review Manager Version 5.4.1 software was used for the meta-analysis.ResultsThe two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in the PARPi group than the placebo (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.68). Furthermore, patients in the PARPi group with the BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm), BRCA wild type, homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD), or HRD without BRCAm, but not with homologous-recombination proficiency had a significantly better two-year PFS than the patients in the placebo group. The five-year overall survival (OS) was comparable in the two groups, but patients in the PARPi group with BRCAm had a significantly better five-year OS than those in the placebo group (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.74). In addition, the adverse event rate (≥ grade 3) was significantly higher in the PARPi group than in the placebo group (HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.13 to 7.63).ConclusionsIn patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC, PARPi maintenance therapy was significantly more effective in terms of survival than no PARPi treatment. However, the risk of serious adverse events was higher for patients who received PARPi maintenance therapy.</div

Search strategy.

(A) Pubmed, (B) Cochrane Library, (C) Embase, and (D) KoreaMed. (PDF)</p