4 research outputs found
Structural and Kinetic Studies of Intermediates of a Biomimetic Diiron Proton-Reduction Catalyst
One-electron reduction
and subsequent protonation of a biomimetic
proton-reduction catalyst [FeFe(μ-pdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>] (pdt
= propanedithiolate), <b>1</b>, were investigated by UV–vis
and IR spectroscopy on a nano- to microsecond time scale. The study
aimed to provide further insight into the proton-reduction cycle of
this [FeFe]-hydrogenase model complex, which with its prototypical
alkyldithiolate-bridged diiron core is widely employed as a molecular,
precious metal-free catalyst for sustainable H<sub>2</sub> generation.
The one-electron-reduced catalyst was obtained transiently by electron
transfer from photogenerated [Ru(dmb)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup> in
the absence of proton sources or in the presence of acids (dichloro-
or trichloroacetic acid or tosylic acid). The reduced catalyst and
its protonation product were observed in real time by UV–vis
and IR spectroscopy, leading to their structural characterization
and providing kinetic data on the electron and proton transfer reactions. <b>1</b> features an intact (μ<sup>2</sup>,κ<sup>2</sup>-pdt)(μ-H)Fe<sub>2</sub> core in the reduced, <b>1<sup>–</sup></b>, and reduced-protonated states, <b>1H</b>, in contrast
to the Fe–S bond cleavage upon the reduction of [FeFe(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>], <b>2</b>, with a benzenedithiolate bridge. The driving-force
dependence of the rate constants for the protonation of <b>1<sup>–</sup></b> (<i>k</i><sub>pt</sub> = 7.0 ×
10<sup>5</sup>, 1.3 × 10<sup>7</sup>, and 7.0 × 10<sup>7</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> for the three acids
used in this study) suggests a reorganization energy >1 eV and
indicates
that hydride complex <b>1H</b> is formed by direct protonation
of the Fe–Fe bond. The protonation of <b>1<sup>–</sup></b> is sufficiently fast even with the weaker acids, which excludes
a rate-limiting role in light-driven H<sub>2</sub> formation under
typical conditions
Direct Observation of Key Catalytic Intermediates in a Photoinduced Proton Reduction Cycle with a Diiron Carbonyl Complex
The
structure and reactivity of intermediates in the photocatalytic
cycle of a proton reduction catalyst, [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>] (bdt = benzenedithiolate), were investigated by time-resolved
spectroscopy. The singly reduced catalyst [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>−</sup>, a key intermediate in photocatalytic
H<sub>2</sub> formation, was generated by reaction with one-electron
reductants in laser flash-quench experiments and could be observed
spectroscopically on the nanoseconds to microseconds time scale. From
UV/vis and IR spectroscopy, [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>−</sup> is readily distinguished from the two-electron
reduced catalyst [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2–</sup> that is obtained inevitably in the electrochemical
reduction of [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]. For
the disproportionation rate constant of [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>−</sup>, an upper limit
on the order of 10<sup>7</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> was estimated, which precludes a major role of [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2–</sup> in photoinduced proton reduction
cycles. Structurally [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>−</sup> is characterized by a rather asymmetrically
distorted geometry with one broken Fe–S bond and six terminal
CO ligands. Acids with p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> ≤ 12.7
protonate [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>−</sup> with bimolecular rate constants of 4 × 10<sup>6</sup>, 7 ×
10<sup>6</sup>, and 2 × 10<sup>8</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> (trichloroacetic, trifluoroacetic, and toluenesulfonic
acids, respectively). The resulting hydride complex [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>H] is therefore likely to be an
intermediate in photocatalytic cycles. This intermediate resembles
structurally and electronically the parent complex [Fe<sub>2</sub>(bdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>], with very similar carbonyl stretching
frequencies
Ultrafast Electron Transfer Between Dye and Catalyst on a Mesoporous NiO Surface
The combination of molecular dyes
and catalysts with semiconductors
into dye-sensitized solar fuel devices (DSSFDs) requires control of
efficient interfacial and surface charge transfer between the components.
The present study reports on the light-induced electron transfer processes
of p-type NiO films cosensitized with coumarin C343 and a bioinspired
proton reduction catalyst, [FeFe](mcbdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub> (mcbdt =
3-carboxybenzene-1,2-dithiolate). By transient optical spectroscopy we find that ultrafast interfacial
electron transfer (τ ≈ 200 fs) from NiO to the excited
C343 (“hole injection”) is followed by rapid (<i>t</i><sub>1/2</sub> ≈ 10 ps) and efficient surface electron
transfer from C343<sup>–</sup> to the coadsorbed [FeFe](mcbdt)(CO)<sub>6</sub>. The reduced catalyst has a clear spectroscopic signature
that persists for several tens of microseconds, before charge recombination
with NiO holes occurs. The demonstration of rapid surface electron
transfer from dye to catalyst on NiO, and the relatively long lifetime
of the resulting charge separated state, suggests the possibility
to use these systems for photocathodes on DSSFDs
Sensitizer-Catalyst Assemblies for Water Oxidation
Two molecular assemblies
with one Ru(II)-polypyridine photosensitizer covalently linked to
one Ru(II)(bda)L<sub>2</sub> catalyst (<b>1</b>) (bda = 2,2′-bipyridine-6,6′-dicarboxylate)
and two photosensitizers covalently linked to one catalyst (<b>2</b>) have been prepared using a simple C–C bond as the
linkage. In the presence of sodium persulfate as a sacrificial electron
acceptor, both of them show high activity for catalytic water oxidation
driven by visible light, with a turnover number up to 200 for <b>2</b>. The linked photocatalysts show a lower initial yield for
light driven oxygen evolution but a much better photostability compared
to the three component system with separate sensitizer, catalyst and
acceptor, leading to a much greater turnover number. Photocatalytic
experiments and time-resolved spectroscopy were carried out to probe
the mechanism of this catalysis. The linked catalyst in its Ru(II)
state rapidly quenches the sensitizer, predominantly by energy transfer.
However, a higher stability under photocatalytic condition is shown
for the linked sensitizer compared to the three component system,
which is attributed to kinetic stabilization by rapid photosensitizer
regeneration. Strategies for employment of the sensitizer-catalyst
molecules in more efficient photocatalytic systems are discussed