S1 Data -

The objective of this study was to examine the associations between personality, general and diabetes-specific well-being and self-efficacy, and weight management indicators, among adults with type 2 diabetes. In addition, to examine whether personality provides incremental explanation of variance in weight management indicators. Australian adults with type 2 diabetes (N = 270; 56% women; age: 61±12 years) were recruited via the national diabetes registry. An online survey included measures of: personality (HEXACO-PI-R), weight management indicators (physical activity, healthy diet, body mass index [BMI]), general well-being (WHO-5), general self-efficacy (GSE), diabetes distress (DDS) and diabetes self-efficacy (DMSES). Analyses included bivariate correlations and linear regression, adjusted for demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. All six personality domains showed significant correlation with at least one weight management indicator: physical activity with extraversion (r = .28), conscientiousness (r = .18) and openness (r = .19); healthy diet with honesty-humility (r = .19), extraversion (r = .24), and agreeableness (r = .14); and BMI with emotionality (r = .20) and extraversion (r = -.20). The strongest associations with general and diabetes-specific well-being and self-efficacy were apparent for extraversion, emotionality and conscientiousness (range: r = -.47-.66). Beyond covariates, personality domains explained additional variance for physical activity (Adjusted R2 = .31, R2 difference = .03, p = .03; openness: β = .16, p = .02, emotionality: β = .15, p = .04) and healthy diet (Adjusted R2 = .19, R2 difference = .03, p = .02; honesty-humility: β = .20, p = .002, extraversion: β = .19, p = .04) but not BMI. This study shows that personality is associated with weight management indicators and psychological factors among adults with type 2 diabetes. Further research is needed, including objective measurement of weight management indictors, to examine how personality influences the experience of type 2 diabetes.</div

Standardised coefficients of regression models explaining variance in weight management indicators (N = 266^).

Standardised coefficients of regression models explaining variance in weight management indicators (N = 266^).</p

Participants’ demographic, clinical, psychosocial and weight management characteristics (N = 270^{b'^'}).

Participants’ demographic, clinical, psychosocial and weight management characteristics (N = 270b'^').</p

STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of <i>cross-sectional studies</i>.

STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies.</p

Correlation matrix of weight management, personality domains, psychosocial, demographic and clinical variables (N = 270^).

Correlation matrix of weight management, personality domains, psychosocial, demographic and clinical variables (N = 270^).</p

Regression model with cross-sectional explanatory variables for physical activity reorganised, demonstrating suppressor effect of diabetes distress.

Regression model with cross-sectional explanatory variables for physical activity reorganised, demonstrating suppressor effect of diabetes distress.</p

Description of facet-level correlations.

The objective of this study was to examine the associations between personality, general and diabetes-specific well-being and self-efficacy, and weight management indicators, among adults with type 2 diabetes. In addition, to examine whether personality provides incremental explanation of variance in weight management indicators. Australian adults with type 2 diabetes (N = 270; 56% women; age: 61±12 years) were recruited via the national diabetes registry. An online survey included measures of: personality (HEXACO-PI-R), weight management indicators (physical activity, healthy diet, body mass index [BMI]), general well-being (WHO-5), general self-efficacy (GSE), diabetes distress (DDS) and diabetes self-efficacy (DMSES). Analyses included bivariate correlations and linear regression, adjusted for demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. All six personality domains showed significant correlation with at least one weight management indicator: physical activity with extraversion (r = .28), conscientiousness (r = .18) and openness (r = .19); healthy diet with honesty-humility (r = .19), extraversion (r = .24), and agreeableness (r = .14); and BMI with emotionality (r = .20) and extraversion (r = -.20). The strongest associations with general and diabetes-specific well-being and self-efficacy were apparent for extraversion, emotionality and conscientiousness (range: r = -.47-.66). Beyond covariates, personality domains explained additional variance for physical activity (Adjusted R2 = .31, R2 difference = .03, p = .03; openness: β = .16, p = .02, emotionality: β = .15, p = .04) and healthy diet (Adjusted R2 = .19, R2 difference = .03, p = .02; honesty-humility: β = .20, p = .002, extraversion: β = .19, p = .04) but not BMI. This study shows that personality is associated with weight management indicators and psychological factors among adults with type 2 diabetes. Further research is needed, including objective measurement of weight management indictors, to examine how personality influences the experience of type 2 diabetes.</div

Validated measures, including description, number of items, response format and scoring.

Validated measures, including description, number of items, response format and scoring.</p

Breakdown of response rate, exclusions and final sample for the study.

Breakdown of response rate, exclusions and final sample for the study.</p

Correlations between personality facets and weight management, general well-being and self-efficacy and diabetes-specific distress and self-efficacy.

Correlations between personality facets and weight management, general well-being and self-efficacy and diabetes-specific distress and self-efficacy.</p