Summary characteristics of participants and interventions.

Summary characteristics of participants and interventions.</p

Forest plot showing the effect of nurse-led TCIs on emergency department visits and risk of bias assessment for each study.

Forest plot showing the effect of nurse-led TCIs on emergency department visits and risk of bias assessment for each study.</p

Fig 6 -

Dose-response relationship of the adapted HF-DMSI score with (a) all-cause readmissions and (b) HF-specific readmissions.</p

Summary of findings.

(DOCX)</p

Forest plot showing the effect of nurse-led TCIs on HF-specific readmissions and risk of bias assessment for each study.

Forest plot showing the effect of nurse-led TCIs on HF-specific readmissions and risk of bias assessment for each study.</p

Flowchart illustrating the search strategy (limit time 2000–2020).

From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.</p

S6 File -

Funnel plots for the effect of nurse-led TCIs on (a) all-cause readmissions and (b) HF-specific readmissions. (DOCX)</p

The adapted HF Disease Management Scoring Instrument (HF-DMSI).

(DOCX)</p

Search strategy.

(PDF)</p

Summary characteristics of participants and interventions in the included studies.

(DOCX)</p