Image_4_Deep Learning-Based Protein Features Predict Overall Survival and Chemotherapy Benefit in Gastric Cancer.jpeg

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high mortality rate worldwide and lacks effective methods for prognosis prediction. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, but only a subgroup of patients benefits from it. Here, we used 833 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded resected tumor samples from patients with TNM stage II/III GC and established a proteomic subtyping workflow using 100 deep-learned features. Two proteomic subtypes (S-I and S-II) with overall survival differences were identified. S-I has a better survival rate and is sensitive to chemotherapy. Patients in the S-I who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significant improvement in the 5-year overall survival rate compared with patients who received surgery alone (65.3% vs 52.6%; log-rank P = 0.014), but no improvement was observed in the S-II (54% vs 51%; log-rank P = 0.96). These results were verified in an independent validation set. Furthermore, we also evaluated the superiority and scalability of the deep learning-based workflow in cancer molecular subtyping, exhibiting its great utility and potential in prognosis prediction and therapeutic decision-making.</p

Image_3_Deep Learning-Based Protein Features Predict Overall Survival and Chemotherapy Benefit in Gastric Cancer.jpeg

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high mortality rate worldwide and lacks effective methods for prognosis prediction. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, but only a subgroup of patients benefits from it. Here, we used 833 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded resected tumor samples from patients with TNM stage II/III GC and established a proteomic subtyping workflow using 100 deep-learned features. Two proteomic subtypes (S-I and S-II) with overall survival differences were identified. S-I has a better survival rate and is sensitive to chemotherapy. Patients in the S-I who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significant improvement in the 5-year overall survival rate compared with patients who received surgery alone (65.3% vs 52.6%; log-rank P = 0.014), but no improvement was observed in the S-II (54% vs 51%; log-rank P = 0.96). These results were verified in an independent validation set. Furthermore, we also evaluated the superiority and scalability of the deep learning-based workflow in cancer molecular subtyping, exhibiting its great utility and potential in prognosis prediction and therapeutic decision-making.</p

Image_5_Deep Learning-Based Protein Features Predict Overall Survival and Chemotherapy Benefit in Gastric Cancer.jpeg

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high mortality rate worldwide and lacks effective methods for prognosis prediction. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, but only a subgroup of patients benefits from it. Here, we used 833 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded resected tumor samples from patients with TNM stage II/III GC and established a proteomic subtyping workflow using 100 deep-learned features. Two proteomic subtypes (S-I and S-II) with overall survival differences were identified. S-I has a better survival rate and is sensitive to chemotherapy. Patients in the S-I who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significant improvement in the 5-year overall survival rate compared with patients who received surgery alone (65.3% vs 52.6%; log-rank P = 0.014), but no improvement was observed in the S-II (54% vs 51%; log-rank P = 0.96). These results were verified in an independent validation set. Furthermore, we also evaluated the superiority and scalability of the deep learning-based workflow in cancer molecular subtyping, exhibiting its great utility and potential in prognosis prediction and therapeutic decision-making.</p

Image_2_Deep Learning-Based Protein Features Predict Overall Survival and Chemotherapy Benefit in Gastric Cancer.jpeg

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high mortality rate worldwide and lacks effective methods for prognosis prediction. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, but only a subgroup of patients benefits from it. Here, we used 833 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded resected tumor samples from patients with TNM stage II/III GC and established a proteomic subtyping workflow using 100 deep-learned features. Two proteomic subtypes (S-I and S-II) with overall survival differences were identified. S-I has a better survival rate and is sensitive to chemotherapy. Patients in the S-I who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significant improvement in the 5-year overall survival rate compared with patients who received surgery alone (65.3% vs 52.6%; log-rank P = 0.014), but no improvement was observed in the S-II (54% vs 51%; log-rank P = 0.96). These results were verified in an independent validation set. Furthermore, we also evaluated the superiority and scalability of the deep learning-based workflow in cancer molecular subtyping, exhibiting its great utility and potential in prognosis prediction and therapeutic decision-making.</p

Image_1_Deep Learning-Based Protein Features Predict Overall Survival and Chemotherapy Benefit in Gastric Cancer.jpeg

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high mortality rate worldwide and lacks effective methods for prognosis prediction. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, but only a subgroup of patients benefits from it. Here, we used 833 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded resected tumor samples from patients with TNM stage II/III GC and established a proteomic subtyping workflow using 100 deep-learned features. Two proteomic subtypes (S-I and S-II) with overall survival differences were identified. S-I has a better survival rate and is sensitive to chemotherapy. Patients in the S-I who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significant improvement in the 5-year overall survival rate compared with patients who received surgery alone (65.3% vs 52.6%; log-rank P = 0.014), but no improvement was observed in the S-II (54% vs 51%; log-rank P = 0.96). These results were verified in an independent validation set. Furthermore, we also evaluated the superiority and scalability of the deep learning-based workflow in cancer molecular subtyping, exhibiting its great utility and potential in prognosis prediction and therapeutic decision-making.</p

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Consensus Spectrum Generation Methods in Proteomics

Spectrum clustering is a powerful strategy to minimize redundant mass spectra by grouping them based on similarity, with the aim of forming groups of mass spectra from the same repeatedly measured analytes. Each such group of near-identical spectra can be represented by its so-called consensus spectrum for downstream processing. Although several algorithms for spectrum clustering have been adequately benchmarked and tested, the influence of the consensus spectrum generation step is rarely evaluated. Here, we present an implementation and benchmark of common consensus spectrum algorithms, including spectrum averaging, spectrum binning, the most similar spectrum, and the best-identified spectrum. We have analyzed diverse public data sets using two different clustering algorithms (spectra-cluster and MaRaCluster) to evaluate how the consensus spectrum generation procedure influences downstream peptide identification. The BEST and BIN methods were found the most reliable methods for consensus spectrum generation, including for data sets with post-translational modifications (PTM) such as phosphorylation. All source code and data of the present study are freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/statisticalbiotechnology/representative-spectra-benchmark

Additional file 6 of Urine proteomics identifies biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease at different stages

Additional file 6: Table S4. Differentially excreted proteins between DKD stage 3 and DKD stage 4. Sheet 1: differentially excreted proteins between DKD stage 3 and DKD stage 4 in Batch 1. Sheet 2: differentially excreted proteins between DKD stage 3 and DKD stage 4 in Batch 2

Additional file 1 of Urine proteomics identifies biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease at different stages

Additional file 1: Figure S1. A brief summary of proteomics analysis of human urine proteome. a. Pearson correlation coefficients of representative LC-MS/MS analyses of 293T cells as quality control samples. b. The dynamic range of urine protein abundance of high analytical confidence proteins. c. Number of GPs quantified in each urinary sample. d. Scatter plots showing the negative correlation between the three significant urinary proteins (RBP4, C7, ALB) and glomerular filtration rate

Additional file 2 of Urine proteomics identifies biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease at different stages

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Risk score for predicting potential DKD patients based on the 4-protein classifier. a. Risk scores and the 4 marker protein expression levels of the high-risk “pre-DKD” patients at indicated times. The risk score was calculated by the predict_proba function in the sklearn (version 0.21.2) package based on Logistic Regression Classifier. b. Risk scores and the 4 marker protein expression levels of the diabetic patients

Additional file 4 of Urine proteomics identifies biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease at different stages

Additional file 4: Table S2. Urine proteomics analysis of diabetes DKD, and CKD. Sheet 1: differentially excreted proteins between diabetes, DKD and CKD. Sheet 2: correlation analysis for the 2946 proteins and 13 routinely tested clinical or health indexes