Additional file 2 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 2: Table S2. Sequencing reads and mapping rate of 21 cannabis accessions

Additional file 7 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 7: Fig. S1. Analysis of the differences in the main phenotypic characteristics between wild cannabisand cultivated cannabis. The data represent the means ± SDs. Significant differences were determined using GraphPad Prism 8 software (* indicates P <0.05; ** indicates P < 0.01; *** indicates P < 0.001; **** indicates P< 0.0001)

Additional file 5 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 5: Table S5. Positive selection genes identified by Fst and Δπ in cultivated cannabis accessions (Group 1 and Group 2) by comparison of cultivated cannabis and wild cannabis accessions (Group 3 and Group 4)

Additional file 3 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 3: Table S3. Distribution of SNPs across the whole genome of 52 cannabis accessions

Additional file 4 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 4: Table S4. The nucleotide diversities of 52 samples

Additional file 6 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 6: Table S6. The primers and probes used in this study

Additional file 9 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 9: Fig. S3. Expression of FT-like in wild (W4) and cultivated (C4) cannabis accessions grown underLD conditions at different time points on the same day. Thephotoperiod was set such that it was 18 h of light/6 h of darkness (6:00-24:00for light). Samples were taken every three hours. The sampling location was thefirst to second pair of true leaves, from the top down

Additional file 8 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 8: Fig. S2. Summary of nucleotide diversity and correlations between latitude and diversity among cultivated cannabis accessions. A Nucleotide diversity calculated for each individual and plotted based on different groups interms of population structure. The boxes and inside lines represent quartile ranges and median values, respectively. B Scatterplot and linear fitting curve of the latitude and diversity of 13 cultivated cannabis varieties (C1-C6, C9-C12, YNN, GXI and SCN), with some admixed samples removed. C Correlations between latitude and diversity among the 13 cultivated cannabis accessions

Additional file 1 of Whole-genome resequencing of wild and cultivated cannabis reveals the genetic structure and adaptive selection of important traits

Additional file 1: Table S1. Morphological and agronomic characteristics of 21 cannabis accessions in Kunming