In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections

This study uses an experimental design to simulate the ballot counting process during a hand-recount after a disputed election. Applying psychological theories of motivated reasoning to the political process, we find that ballot counters’ party identification conditionally influences their ballot counting decisions. Party identification’s effect on motivated reasoning is greater when ballot counters are given ambiguous, versus specific, instructions for determining voter intent. This study’s findings have major implications for ballot counting procedures throughout the United States and for the use of motivated reasoning in the political science literature

US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report

This white paper summarizes the workshop "U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter" held at University of Maryland on March 23-25, 2017.Comment: 102 pages + reference

Validation of PITCHAI Markerless Motion Capture Using Gold Standard 3D Motion Capture

Kinematic assessments in baseball pitchers have previously been determined using marker-based motion capture systems. No current research exists on the feasibility of single camera markerless motion capture technology for kinematic pitching analysis. This study sought to compare and validate pitching kinematics (joint angles, summary metrics) from a markerless motion capture solution with a gold standard, 3D optical marker-based solution. 38 elite-level healthy pitchers threw 1-3 maximum effort pitches while concurrently using marker-based optical capture and pitchAITM smartphone based (markerless) motion capture. Measures were compared using Pearson's R (R), R Squared (r2), and root mean square error (RMSE). Kinematics were evaluated at foot plant, maximal shoulder external rotation, ball release, and for descriptive metrics. For full time-series angles, pelvis and trunk averaged r2 of 0.92, and 6.0 ± 1.1° of RMSE. Knee angles averaged an r2 of 0.87 ± 0.08, and 8.8 ± 3.6° of RMSE. Throwing arm averaged an r2 of 0.88 ± 0.03, and 12.3 ± 4.2° of RMSE.  Glove arm averaged an r2 of 0.81 ± 0.09, and 14.1 ± 4.5° of RMSE. Most metrics were comparable to the gold standard. pitchAITM can be recommended as a markerless alternative to marker-based motion capture for pitching kinematic analysis.

Antigen-capturing nanoparticles improve the abscopal effect and cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy holds tremendous promise for improving cancer treatment1. Administering radiotherapy with immunotherapy has been shown to improve immune responses and can elicit an “abscopal effect”2. Unfortunately, response rates for this strategy remain low3. Herein, we report an improved cancer immunotherapy approach that utilizes antigen-capturing nanoparticles (AC-NPs). We engineered several AC-NPs formulations and demonstrated that the set of protein antigens captured by each AC-NP formulation is dependent upon NP surface properties. We showed that AC-NPs deliver tumor specific proteins to antigen-presenting cells and significantly improve the efficacy of αPD-1 treatment using the B16F10 melanoma model, generating up to 20% cure rate as compared to 0% without AC-NPs. Mechanistic studies revealed that AC-NPs induced an expansion of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and increased both CD4+/Treg and CD8+/Treg ratios. Our work presents a novel strategy for improving cancer immunotherapy with nanotechnology

Author Correction: Antigen-capturing nanoparticles improve the abscopal effect and cancer immunotherapy

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00864-w

Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries

Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely