Western blot analysis of Kv 2.1 and Kv4.2 subunit expression in cerebral cortex and hippocampus.

<p>Representative immunoblot of cerebral cortex and hippocampus enriched membrane proteins (50 µg/lane) from (Ctr), Aβ_25–35, Aβ_25–35+SP and SP treated rats. Protein markers are shown at right (in kDa). The immunoreactive signals for <b>a</b>) Kv2.1 and <b>b</b>) Kv4.2 were quantified and normalized against β-actin and expressed as a percentage of control (CTR). Data represent mean (±SEM) from 3 independent experiments. Statistically significant differences were calculated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (**p<0.01 versus Ctr value).</p

Immunofluorescence analysis of Kv1.4 subunit expression in hippocampus and cerebral cortex.

<p>Upper panel. Representative immunofluorescence photomicrographs showing Kv1.4 expression in <b>a</b>) hippocampus and <b>b</b>) frontal cortex after memory tests in the four experimental treatments: Control (Saline), Aβ_25–35-i.c.v. treated rats (Abeta), Aβ_25–35-i.c.v. and SP-i.p. treated rats (Abeta+SP), SP-i.p. treated rats (SP). Brain sections were labeled with the neuronal marker NeuN (green) and with the anti Kv1.4 antibody (red). As shown by the merge channel all neurons are Kv1.4 positive. Note the diffuse increase in Kv1.4 fluorescence intensity in the Abeta group and the decrease in the Abeta+SP group compared to the Control. Scale bar: a) 20 µm; b) 60 µm. Lower panel. Histograms showing image analysis performed on neuronal cytoplasm (first row) and the surrounding neuropil (second row). The indexes used were: total fluorescence intensity, vesicles diameters, and vesicles fluorescence intensity. Data represent means (±S.E.M.) obtained from three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences were calculated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (**p<0.01 versus Saline; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 versus Aβ_25–35treatment).</p

Novel Highly Potent and Selective σ₁ Receptor Antagonists Related to Spipethiane

Conservative chemical modifications of the core structure of the lead spipethiane (1) afforded novel potent σ1 ligands. σ1 affinity and σ1/σ2 selectivity proved to be favored by the introduction of polar functions (oxygen atom or carbonyl group) in position 3 or 4 (4−6) or by the elongation of the distance between the two hydrophobic portions of the molecule with the simultaneous presence of a carbonyl group in position 4 (8 and 9). The observed cytostatic effect against the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7/ADR, highly expressing σ1 receptors, and not against MCF-7, as well as the enhancement of morphine analgesia highlighted the σ1 antagonist profile of this series of compounds. In particular, due to its high σ1 affinity (pKi = 10.28) and σ1/σ2 selectivity ratio (29510), compound 9 might be a novel valuable tool for σ receptor characterization and a suitable template for the rational design of potential therapeutically useful σ1 antagonists

SP reduced Aβ25–35-induced overexpression of Kv1.4 subunit in rat hippocampal neurons.

<p><b>a</b>) Example of Western blot obtained from hippocampal cultures exposed to 20 µM Aβ_25–35 (Aβ alone or in the presence of SP (100 nM) and analyzed 48 h later using a polyclonal antibody against Kv1.4 subunit. The same blots were stripped and reprobed with an antibody against β-actin as internal control (lower panels). Quantitative analysis is depicted below the blots and was determined by band densitometry analysis considering the values found in CTR cells as 100. Data represent means (±S.E.M.) obtained from 4 independent experiments run in duplicate. (**p<0.001 versus CTR, #p<0.05 versus Aβ_25–35 treatment). <b>b</b>) Representative immunofluorescence photomicrographs showing Kv1.4 expression in primary hippocampal cultures. Note the increase in immunofluorescence in the Aβ_25–35 neurons, as compared to control neurons, reversed by SP treatment. Images were obtained from three independent experiments. Scale bar: 20 µm.</p

Western blot analysis of Kv1.4 subunit expression in hippocampus and cerebral cortex.

<p>Representative immunoblot of (<b>a</b>) hippocampus and (<b>b</b>) cerebral cortex enriched membrane proteins (50 µg/lane) from (Ctr), Aβ_25–35, Aβ_25–35+SP and SP treated rats. Protein markers are shown at right (in kDa). The immunoreactive signals at 97 and 110 kDa were quantified and normalized against β-actin and expressed as a percentage of the control (Ctr). Data represent mean (±SEM) from 5 independent experiments. Statistically significant differences were calculated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (**p<0.01 versus Ctr value; #p<0.05 versus Aβ_25–35 treatment).</p

Neuroprotective effects of SP on memory impairments induced by intracerebroventricular injection of Aβ25–35.

<p>(a) Timeline and experimental design. All animals received an infusion (i.c.v.) of Aβ_25–35 (2 µg/µl; 10 µL injection volume) or its vehicle (PBS 10 µL injection volume) and daily treated (7 days) with SP (50 µg/ml/Kg, i.p.) or its vehicle (saline solution 0.9%, i.p.). On the 31^st day after surgery rats were given a daily training session of 4 trials for 3 consecutive days (days 31^st–33^rd). On the 34^th day after surgery the retention of the spatial training was assessed during a 1 min probe trial. On the 35^th day after surgery rats were given a daily training session of 5 trials for 4 consecutive days (days 35^th–38^th). (b) Mean (±S.E.M.) distance traveled to the escape platform on 4 trials of 3 consecutive days of acquisition learning sessions. (c) Time spent (mean ±S.E.M.) during the 1-minute probe trial in the target quadrant and (d) illustrative paths of all animals for the probe test session. (e) Mean (±S.E.M.) distance traveled to the escape platform on 4 trials of 4 consecutive days of the reversal learning sessions (the hidden platform were relocated in a new position each day). * p<0.05 Aβ_25–35/Sal <i>vs</i> PBS/Sal; # p<0.05 Aβ_25–35/Sal <i>vs</i> PBS/SP; $ p<0.05 Aβ_25–35/Sal <i>vs</i> Aβ_25–35/SP. PBS/Sal, n = 10; PBS/SP, n = 10; Aβ_25–35/Sal n = 12; Aβ_25–35/SP, n = 10.</p