4 research outputs found


    Get PDF
    The strategic rivalry that involved between two major geopolitics power states, United States and China threatening the stability of Southeast Asia regional autonomy. The Sino-US strategic rivalry which happening over maritime access, supremacy, and dominance in Indian Ocean and South China Sea become a particular concern for the ASEAN Member States, including Indonesia. At the same time, Indonesia government under Joko Widodo proposed doctrine maritime through its foreign policy. The aim of maritime doctrine foreign policy is to create a unity from the sea. This paper argue that Indonesia proposed maritime doctrine foreign policy to response the strategic rivalry in Southeast Asia. Using qualitative method, it is revealed the reasons of Indonesian Government using maritime doctrine foreign policy to mediate strategic rivalry in Southeast Asia by: (1) seeks to preserve Southeast Asia’s strategic autonomy and maritime security, and (2) give a conflict resolution for ASEAN to survive between Sino-US strategic rivalry.

    Tujuan UCLG ASPAC dalam Implementasi Kerjasama Lingkungan Climate Resilience and Inclusive Cities (CRIC) Project di Kota Cirebon

    Get PDF
    Pada tahun 2020 lalu, Kota Cirebon dipilih oleh UCLG ASPAC sebagai salah satu kota percontohan dalam sebuah proyek kerjasama lingkungan bernama Climate Resilience and Inclusive Cities (CRIC). Meskipun begitu, Pemerintah Kota Cirebon pada dasarnya sudah memiliki berbagai upaya dalam menangani permasalahan ketahanan iklim yakni dengan pengembangan program Kampung Iklim (Proklim) hingga pengembangan program Pelayanan Sampah dan Kebersihan. Metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data berbasis internet, dokumen dan wawancara. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori peran organisasi internasional untuk menjelaskan tujuan UCLG ASPAC dalam implementasi kerjasama lingkungan Climate Resilience and Inclusive Cities (CRIC) Project di Kota Cirebon. Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pemlihan Kota Cirebon sebagai kota percontohan dalam proyek CRIC oleh UCLG ASPAC didorong oleh adanya isu perubahan iklim yang mana dalam hal ini UCLG ASPAC menginginkan agar kota tersebut bertindak sesuai dengan arahan UCLG ASPAC khususnya dalam upaya menangani perubahan iklim di Kawasan Asia Pasifik

    Analisis Perbandingan Persepsi dalam Perumusan Kebijakan Luar Negeri antara Moon Jae In dan Yoon Suk Yeol terhadap Aliansi Pertahanan Korea Selatan – Amerika Serikat Tahun 2017-2022

    Get PDF
    This study compares the perceptions of foreign policy of the two South Korean leaders, Moon Jae In and Yoon Suk Yeol. The comparison of perceptions leads to the continuation of the defense alliance cooperation with the United States. The political transition is very visible in the two figures in building the progress of cooperation. Moon is known as a liberal-leaning political figure with a humanist style, so he is careful to establish two-way cooperation with the United States and North Korea to avoid threats to security stability in the region. Meanwhile, Yoon Suk Yeol is better known as a leader who represents conservatives as his political principle. Yoon is showing more aggressiveness to increase military strength with the United States in the face of North Korea's possession of nuclear weapons. This study uses the theory of Ole R. Holsti to understand the foreign policy perceptions of each figure which leads to output as foreign policy. There are three components to form a perception scheme in foreign policy, namely information, belief system, and perception. This study found that there are party interests and paradigm values in the belief system that have a strong influence in shaping the perceptions of Moon Jae In and Yoon Suk Yeol. This analysis also shows the contrast between regime shifts which show that both of them have a closed image and there is resistance to the continuation of policies in the previous regime so that the alliance cooperation with the United States experiences dynamics

    Idea, Identity and Interesubjective Means of India Act East Foreign Policy towards Taiwan

    Get PDF
    This article aims to examine the reason why India is continuing to maintain cooperation with Taiwan through the “Act East” policy, even though it has not provided high benefits for India? In order to answer the question, this article employed a constructivism perspective related to foreign policy analysis. In constructivism foreign policy analysis, ideas and identity are vital for the state. India's “Act East” towards Taiwan reflects some element of constructivism which encompass ideas, national identity and intersubjective means that influences preference, policy choice and state interest. The first, India’s “Act East” is an idea to revive strategic and historical relations with Taiwan. Second, the positive India-Taiwan intersubjective process formed a shared understanding based on the values of freedom, democracy, human rights, and the norms. Third, the national identity as an emerging power puts India to coexist peacefully with Taiwan and maintain security as well as stability in the region