4 research outputs found
Syntheses, Structures, and Magnetic Properties of Acetato- and Diphenolato-Bridged 3d–4f Binuclear Complexes [M(3-MeOsaltn)(MeOH)<sub><i>x</i></sub>(ac)Ln(hfac)<sub>2</sub>] (M = Zn<sup>II</sup>, Cu<sup>II</sup>, Ni<sup>II</sup>, Co<sup>II</sup>; Ln = La<sup>III</sup>, Gd<sup>III</sup>, Tb<sup>III</sup>, Dy<sup>III</sup>; 3‑MeOsaltn = <i>N,N</i>′‑Bis(3-methoxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-1,3-propanediaminato; ac = Acetato; hfac = Hexafluoroacetylacetonato; <i>x</i> = 0 or 1)
A series
of 3d–4f binuclear complexes, [M(3-MeOsaltn)(MeOH)<sub><i>x</i></sub>(ac)Ln(hfac)<sub>2</sub>] (<i>x</i> = 0 for M = Cu<sup>II</sup>, Zn<sup>II</sup>; <i>x</i> = 1 for M = Co<sup>II</sup>, Ni<sup>II</sup>; Ln = Gd<sup>III</sup>, Tb<sup>III</sup>, Dy<sup>III</sup>, La<sup>III</sup>),
have been synthesized and characterized, where 3-MeOsaltn, ac, and
hfac denote <i>N,N</i>′-bis(3-methoxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-1,3-propanediaminato,
acetato, and hexafluoroacetylacetonato, respectively. The X-ray analyses
demonstrated that all the complexes have an acetato- and diphenolato-bridged
M<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> binuclear structure. The Cu<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> and Zn<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> complexes are crystallized in an isomorphous triclinic
space group <i>P</i>1̅, where the Cu<sup>II</sup> or
Zn<sup>II</sup> ion has square pyramidal coordination geometry with
N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> donor atoms of 3-MeOsaltn at the equatorial
coordination sites and one oxygen atom of the bridging acetato ion
at the axial site. The Co<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> and
Ni<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> complexes are crystallized
in an isomorphous monoclinic space group <i>P</i>2<sub>1</sub>/<i>c</i>, where the Co<sup>II</sup> or Ni<sup>II</sup> ion at the high-spin state has an octahedral coordination environment
with N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> donor atoms of 3-MeOsaltn at the equatorial
sites, and one oxygen atom of the bridged acetato and a methanol oxygen
atom at the two axial sites. Each Ln<sup>III</sup> ion for all the
complexes is coordinated by four oxygen atoms of two phenolato and
two methoxy oxygen atoms of “ligand-complex” M(3-MeOsaltn),
four oxygen atoms of two hfac<sup>–</sup>, and one oxygen atom
of the bridging acetato ion; thus, the coordination number is nine.
The temperature dependent magnetic susceptibilities from 1.9 to 300
K and the field-dependent magnetization up to 5 T at 1.9 K were measured.
Due to the important orbital contributions of the Ln<sup>III</sup> (Tb<sup>III</sup>, Dy<sup>III</sup>) and to a lesser extent the
M<sup>II</sup> (Ni<sup>II</sup>, Co<sup>II</sup>) components, the
magnetic interaction between M<sup>II</sup> and Ln<sup>III</sup> ions
were investigated by an empirical approach based on a comparison of
the magnetic properties of the M<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup>, Zn<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup>, and M<sup>II</sup>–La<sup>III</sup> complexes. The differences of χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i> and <i>M</i>(<i>H</i>) values for
the M<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup>, Zn<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> and those for the M<sup>II</sup>–La<sup>III</sup> complexes, that is, Δ(<i>T</i>) = (χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i>)<sub>MLn</sub> – (χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i>)<sub>ZnLn</sub> – (χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i>)<sub>MLa</sub> = <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>T</i>) and Δ(<i>H</i>) = <i>M</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>H</i>) – <i>M</i><sub>ZnLn</sub>(<i>H</i>)
– <i>M</i><sub>MLa</sub>(<i>H</i>) = <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>H</i>), give the information of 3d–4f
magnetic interaction. The magnetic interactions are ferromagnetic
if M<sup>II</sup> = (Cu<sup>II</sup>, Ni<sup>II</sup>, and Co<sup>II</sup>) and Ln = (Gd<sup>III</sup>, Tb<sup>III</sup>, and Dy<sup>III</sup>). The magnitudes of the ferromagnetic interaction, <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>T</i>) and <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>H</i>), are in the order Cu<sup>II</sup>–Gd<sup>III</sup> > Cu<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> > Cu<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup>, while those are in
the
order of M<sup>II</sup>–Gd<sup>III</sup> ≈ M<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> > M<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> for M<sup>II</sup> = Ni<sup>II</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>. Alternating
current (ac) susceptibility measurements demonstrated that the Ni<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> complexes showed out-of-phase signal with frequency-dependence
and the Ni<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> complexes showed small frequency-dependence.
The energy barrier for the spin flipping was estimated from the Arrhenius
plot to be 14.9(6) and 17.0(4) K for the Ni<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> complexes,
respectively, under a dc bias field of 1000 Oe
Syntheses, Structures, and Magnetic Properties of Acetato- and Diphenolato-Bridged 3d–4f Binuclear Complexes [M(3-MeOsaltn)(MeOH)<sub><i>x</i></sub>(ac)Ln(hfac)<sub>2</sub>] (M = Zn<sup>II</sup>, Cu<sup>II</sup>, Ni<sup>II</sup>, Co<sup>II</sup>; Ln = La<sup>III</sup>, Gd<sup>III</sup>, Tb<sup>III</sup>, Dy<sup>III</sup>; 3‑MeOsaltn = <i>N,N</i>′‑Bis(3-methoxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-1,3-propanediaminato; ac = Acetato; hfac = Hexafluoroacetylacetonato; <i>x</i> = 0 or 1)
A series
of 3d–4f binuclear complexes, [M(3-MeOsaltn)(MeOH)<sub><i>x</i></sub>(ac)Ln(hfac)<sub>2</sub>] (<i>x</i> = 0 for M = Cu<sup>II</sup>, Zn<sup>II</sup>; <i>x</i> = 1 for M = Co<sup>II</sup>, Ni<sup>II</sup>; Ln = Gd<sup>III</sup>, Tb<sup>III</sup>, Dy<sup>III</sup>, La<sup>III</sup>),
have been synthesized and characterized, where 3-MeOsaltn, ac, and
hfac denote <i>N,N</i>′-bis(3-methoxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-1,3-propanediaminato,
acetato, and hexafluoroacetylacetonato, respectively. The X-ray analyses
demonstrated that all the complexes have an acetato- and diphenolato-bridged
M<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> binuclear structure. The Cu<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> and Zn<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> complexes are crystallized in an isomorphous triclinic
space group <i>P</i>1̅, where the Cu<sup>II</sup> or
Zn<sup>II</sup> ion has square pyramidal coordination geometry with
N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> donor atoms of 3-MeOsaltn at the equatorial
coordination sites and one oxygen atom of the bridging acetato ion
at the axial site. The Co<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> and
Ni<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> complexes are crystallized
in an isomorphous monoclinic space group <i>P</i>2<sub>1</sub>/<i>c</i>, where the Co<sup>II</sup> or Ni<sup>II</sup> ion at the high-spin state has an octahedral coordination environment
with N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> donor atoms of 3-MeOsaltn at the equatorial
sites, and one oxygen atom of the bridged acetato and a methanol oxygen
atom at the two axial sites. Each Ln<sup>III</sup> ion for all the
complexes is coordinated by four oxygen atoms of two phenolato and
two methoxy oxygen atoms of “ligand-complex” M(3-MeOsaltn),
four oxygen atoms of two hfac<sup>–</sup>, and one oxygen atom
of the bridging acetato ion; thus, the coordination number is nine.
The temperature dependent magnetic susceptibilities from 1.9 to 300
K and the field-dependent magnetization up to 5 T at 1.9 K were measured.
Due to the important orbital contributions of the Ln<sup>III</sup> (Tb<sup>III</sup>, Dy<sup>III</sup>) and to a lesser extent the
M<sup>II</sup> (Ni<sup>II</sup>, Co<sup>II</sup>) components, the
magnetic interaction between M<sup>II</sup> and Ln<sup>III</sup> ions
were investigated by an empirical approach based on a comparison of
the magnetic properties of the M<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup>, Zn<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup>, and M<sup>II</sup>–La<sup>III</sup> complexes. The differences of χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i> and <i>M</i>(<i>H</i>) values for
the M<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup>, Zn<sup>II</sup>–Ln<sup>III</sup> and those for the M<sup>II</sup>–La<sup>III</sup> complexes, that is, Δ(<i>T</i>) = (χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i>)<sub>MLn</sub> – (χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i>)<sub>ZnLn</sub> – (χ<sub>M</sub><i>T</i>)<sub>MLa</sub> = <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>T</i>) and Δ(<i>H</i>) = <i>M</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>H</i>) – <i>M</i><sub>ZnLn</sub>(<i>H</i>)
– <i>M</i><sub>MLa</sub>(<i>H</i>) = <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>H</i>), give the information of 3d–4f
magnetic interaction. The magnetic interactions are ferromagnetic
if M<sup>II</sup> = (Cu<sup>II</sup>, Ni<sup>II</sup>, and Co<sup>II</sup>) and Ln = (Gd<sup>III</sup>, Tb<sup>III</sup>, and Dy<sup>III</sup>). The magnitudes of the ferromagnetic interaction, <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>T</i>) and <i>J</i><sub>MLn</sub>(<i>H</i>), are in the order Cu<sup>II</sup>–Gd<sup>III</sup> > Cu<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> > Cu<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup>, while those are in
the
order of M<sup>II</sup>–Gd<sup>III</sup> ≈ M<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> > M<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> for M<sup>II</sup> = Ni<sup>II</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>. Alternating
current (ac) susceptibility measurements demonstrated that the Ni<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> complexes showed out-of-phase signal with frequency-dependence
and the Ni<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>–Dy<sup>III</sup> complexes showed small frequency-dependence.
The energy barrier for the spin flipping was estimated from the Arrhenius
plot to be 14.9(6) and 17.0(4) K for the Ni<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup>–Tb<sup>III</sup> complexes,
respectively, under a dc bias field of 1000 Oe
Magnetic Interactions in Cu<sup>II</sup>−Ln<sup>III</sup> Cyclic Tetranuclear Complexes: Is It Possible to Explain the Occurrence of SMM Behavior in Cu<sup>II</sup>−Tb<sup>III</sup> and Cu<sup>II</sup>−Dy<sup>III</sup> Complexes?
An extensive series of tetranuclear CuII2LnIII2 complexes [CuIILLnIII(hfac)2]2 (with LnIII being all lanthanide(III) ions
except for the radioactive PmIII) has been prepared in order to investigate the nature of the CuII−LnIII magnetic
interactions and to try to answer the following question: What makes the CuII2TbIII2 and CuII2DyIII2 complexes single
molecule magnets while the other complexes are not? All the complexes within this series possess a similar cyclic
tetranuclear structure, in which the CuII and LnIII ions are arrayed alternately via bridges of ligand complex (CuIIL).
Regular SQUID magnetometry measurements have been performed on the series. The temperature-dependent
magnetic susceptibilities from 2 to 300 K and the field-dependent magnetizations from 0 to 5 T at 2 K have been
measured for the CuII2LnIII2 and NiII2LnIII2 complexes, with the NiII2LnIII2 complex containing diamagnetic NiII ions
being used as a reference for the evaluation of the CuII−LnIII magnetic interactions. These measurements have
revealed that the interactions between CuII and LnIII ions are very weakly antiferromagnetic if Ln = Ce, Nd, Sm,
Yb, ferromagnetic if Ln = Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, and negligible if Ln = La, Eu, Pr, Lu. With the same goal of
better understanding the evolution of the intramolecular magnetic interactions, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism
(XMCD) has also been measured on CuII2TbIII2, CuII2DyIII2, and NiII2TbIII2 complexes, either at the L- and M-edges
of the metal ions or at the K-edge of the N and O atoms. Last, the CuII2TbIII2 complex exhibiting SMM behavior has
received a closer examination of its low temperature magnetic properties down to 0.1 K. These particular
measurements have revealed the unusual very slow setting-up of a 3D order below 0.6 K
Magnetic Interactions in Cu<sup>II</sup>−Ln<sup>III</sup> Cyclic Tetranuclear Complexes: Is It Possible to Explain the Occurrence of SMM Behavior in Cu<sup>II</sup>−Tb<sup>III</sup> and Cu<sup>II</sup>−Dy<sup>III</sup> Complexes?
An extensive series of tetranuclear CuII2LnIII2 complexes [CuIILLnIII(hfac)2]2 (with LnIII being all lanthanide(III) ions
except for the radioactive PmIII) has been prepared in order to investigate the nature of the CuII−LnIII magnetic
interactions and to try to answer the following question: What makes the CuII2TbIII2 and CuII2DyIII2 complexes single
molecule magnets while the other complexes are not? All the complexes within this series possess a similar cyclic
tetranuclear structure, in which the CuII and LnIII ions are arrayed alternately via bridges of ligand complex (CuIIL).
Regular SQUID magnetometry measurements have been performed on the series. The temperature-dependent
magnetic susceptibilities from 2 to 300 K and the field-dependent magnetizations from 0 to 5 T at 2 K have been
measured for the CuII2LnIII2 and NiII2LnIII2 complexes, with the NiII2LnIII2 complex containing diamagnetic NiII ions
being used as a reference for the evaluation of the CuII−LnIII magnetic interactions. These measurements have
revealed that the interactions between CuII and LnIII ions are very weakly antiferromagnetic if Ln = Ce, Nd, Sm,
Yb, ferromagnetic if Ln = Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, and negligible if Ln = La, Eu, Pr, Lu. With the same goal of
better understanding the evolution of the intramolecular magnetic interactions, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism
(XMCD) has also been measured on CuII2TbIII2, CuII2DyIII2, and NiII2TbIII2 complexes, either at the L- and M-edges
of the metal ions or at the K-edge of the N and O atoms. Last, the CuII2TbIII2 complex exhibiting SMM behavior has
received a closer examination of its low temperature magnetic properties down to 0.1 K. These particular
measurements have revealed the unusual very slow setting-up of a 3D order below 0.6 K
