Analysis of terms used for the diagnosis and classification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and motor neuron disease

There is no test for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and so attempts have been made to produce standardized diagnostic criteria based on clinical and electrophysiological findings, e.g. El Escorial. However, the phenotypic classification of the subtypes of ALS is also based on clinical features leading to conflation of diagnosis and phenotype. We used a five-question online survey with ALS specialists to explore the range of descriptors and how they are used. Of 101 specialists approached, 72 completed the survey. The most frequently used labels were ‘ALS’, ‘PLS’ and ‘familial’. Labels other than the El Escorial categories were mainly used as clinical descriptors (83%). Approximately 50% of respondents recorded that the El Escorial criteria had no useful role in patient discussion or in the diagnostic process. Only 31% of respondents rated their current classification system above the median for being logical. A more rational system explicitly distinguishing diagnostic and phenotypic criteria is essentia

Analysis of terms used for the diagnosis and classification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and motor neuron disease

There is no test for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and so attempts have been made to produce standardized diagnostic criteria based on clinical and electrophysiological findings, e.g. El Escorial. However, the phenotypic classification of the subtypes of ALS is also based on clinical features leading to conflation of diagnosis and phenotype. We used a five-question online survey with ALS specialists to explore the range of descriptors and how they are used. Of 101 specialists approached, 72 completed the survey. The most frequently used labels were ‘ALS’, ‘PLS’ and ‘familial’. Labels other than the El Escorial categories were mainly used as clinical descriptors (83%). Approximately 50% of respondents recorded that the El Escorial criteria had no useful role in patient discussion or in the diagnostic process. Only 31% of respondents rated their current classification system above the median for being logical. A more rational system explicitly distinguishing diagnostic and phenotypic criteria is essentia

Occasional essay: upper motor neuron syndrome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

The diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) requires recognition of both lower (LMN) and upper motor neuron (UMN) dysfunction.1 However, classical UMN signs are frequently difficult to identify in ALS.2 LMN involvement is sensitively detected by electromyography (EMG)3 but, as yet, there are no generally accepted markers for monitoring UMN abnormalities,4 the neurobiology of ALS itself, and disease spread through the brain and spinal cord,.5 Full clinical assessment is therefore necessary to exclude other diagnoses and to monitor disease progression. In part, this difficulty regarding detection of UMN involvement in ALS derives from the definition of ‘the UMN syndrome’. Abnormalities of motor control in ALS require reformulation within an expanded concept of the UMN, together with the neuropathological, neuro-imaging and neurophysiological abnormalities in ALS. We review these issues here

Relative preservation of triceps over biceps strength in upper limb-onset ALS: the 'split elbow'

OBJECTIVE Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of the motor system. The split hand sign in ALS refers to observed preferential weakness of the lateral hand muscles, which is unexplained. One possibility is larger cortical representation of the lateral hand compared with the medial. Biceps strength is usually preserved relative to triceps in neurological conditions, but biceps has a larger cortical representation and might be expected to show preferential weakness in ALS. METHODS Using the South-East England Register for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, we performed a retrospective longitudinal cohort study and extracted the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength score for biceps and triceps in patients with a diagnosis of upper limb-onset ALS in the 19-year period 1996-2015. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the relative strength of the muscles within the total sum of the upper limbs involved in the study. RESULTS There were 659 people with upper limb onset of weakness. In 215 there were insufficient data to perform the analysis, and a further 33 were excluded for other reasons, leaving 411 for analysis. Biceps was stronger than triceps in 87 limbs, and triceps was stronger than biceps in 258 limbs, with no difference seen in the remaining 477. Triceps strength scores (mean rank=186.1) were higher than ipsilateral biceps strength scores (mean rank=134.2), Z=-10.1, p<0.001 (two-tailed). CONCLUSION Triceps strength is relatively preserved compared with biceps in ALS. This is consistent with a broadly corticofugal hypothesis of selective vulnerability, in which susceptibility might be associated with larger cortical representation

Profiling non-coding RNA expression in cerebrospinal fluid of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

Introduction Objective biomarkers for the fatal neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease (ALS/MND) are critical for diagnosis, drug development, clinical trials, and insight into disease pathology. Key candidates for biomarkers present in biofluids include non-coding RNA (ncRNA) transcripts including microRNA, piwi-interacting RNA and transfer RNA. To determine if the central nervous system was the source of the dysregulated ncRNA biomarkers we previously observed in serum, we sought to identify dysregulated ncRNA candidates in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) which may provide new insight into the disease pathology. Methods and materials Small RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was undertaken on CSF samples from healthy controls (n?=?18), disease mimics (n?=?8), and ALS patients (n?=?40) in our Oxford Study for Biomarkers of ALS cohort, with RT-qPCR used to confirm their dysregulation. Results We found a range of ncRNA that were dysregulated in the RNA-seq screen, but these failed to be validated or detected in some cases using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Additionally, our previously identified serum ncRNA biomarker showed no change in CSF or correlation to serum. Conclusions This study suggests the CSF may not be the source of dysregulated ncRNA in the serum and highlights the difficulty in identifying ncRNA in CSF as biomarkers for ALS

Identification of a potential non-coding RNA biomarker signature for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Objective biomarkers for the clinically heterogeneous adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are crucial to facilitate assessing emerging therapeutics and improve the diagnostic pathway in what is a clinically heterogeneous syndrome. With non-coding RNA transcripts including microRNA, piwi-RNA and transfer RNA present in human biofluids, we sought to identify whether non-coding RNA in serum could be biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Serum samples from our Oxford Study for Biomarkers in motor neurone disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis discovery cohort of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients (n?=?48), disease mimics (n?=?16) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n?=?24) were profiled for non-coding RNA expression using RNA-sequencing, which showed a wide range of non-coding RNA to be dysregulated. We confirmed significant alterations with reverse transcription-quantitative PCR in the expression of hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-92a-3p, hsa-piR-33151, TRV-AAC4-1.1 and TRA-AGC6-1.1. Furthermore, hsa-miR-206, a previously identified amyotrophic lateral sclerosis biomarker, showed a binary-like pattern of expression in our samples. Using the expression of these non-coding RNA, we were able to discriminate amyotrophic lateral sclerosis samples from healthy controls in our discovery cohort using a random forest analysis with 93.7% accuracy with promise in predicting progression rate of patients. Importantly, cross-validation of this novel signature using a new geographically distinct cohort of samples from the United Kingdom and Germany with both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and control samples (n?=?156) yielded an accuracy of 73.9%. The high prediction accuracy of this non-coding RNA-based biomarker signature, even across heterogeneous cohorts, demonstrates the strength of our approach as a novel platform to identify and stratify amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

Regionality of disease progression predicts prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurological syndrome in which motor neurons degenerate relentlessly. Although the site of onset and the rate of spread have been studied extensively, little is known about whether focal as opposed to diffuse disease affects prognosis. We therefore tested the hypothesis that regionality of disease burden is a prognostic factor in ALS. We analysed clinical data from two large multicentre, longitudinal trials. Regionality was defined as the difference in progression rates in three domains as measured by the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale, omitting the respiratory domain from analysis. We used death by trial end as the outcome variable and tested this by logistic regression against predictor variables including regionality and overall rate of disease progression. There were 561 patients. Regionality of disease was independently associated with significantly higher chance of death by study end (odds ratio most diffuse against most focal category 0.354 (0.191, 0.657), p = 0.001), with a direct relationship between degree of regionality and odds of death. We have shown using clinical trial data that focal disease is associated with a worse prognosis in ALS. Measures of regionality warrant further independent consideration in the development of future prognostic models

The benefit of evolving multidisciplinary care in ALS: a diagnostic cohort survival comparison

BACKGROUND Care for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has altered at King's College Hospital over the last 20 years. The clinic has been a multidisciplinary, specialist, tertiary referral centre since 1995 with a large team with integrated palliative and respiratory care since 2006. We hypothesised that these changes would improve survival. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, patients diagnosed with El Escorial definite, probable and possible ALS between 1995-1998 and 2008-2011 were followed up. The primary outcome measure was a chi-square test for the proportion of each cohort surviving. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariate regression were secondary analyses. RESULTS There was low reporting of some interventions. Five hundred and forty-seven people were included. Survival between the cohorts was significantly different (p?=?0.022) with a higher proportion surviving during 2008-2011. Survival time was 21.6 (95% CI 19.2-24.0) months in the 2008-2011 cohort compared to 19.2 years (15.6-21.6) in the 1995-1998 cohort (log rank p?=?0.018). Four hundred and ninety-three cases were included in the Cox regression. Diagnostic cohort was a significant predictor variable (HR 0.79 (0.64-0.97) p?=?0.023). CONCLUSIONS These results support the hypothesis that integrated specialist clinics with multidisciplinary input improve survival in ALS

Health utility decreases with increasing clinical stage in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease typically causing death within three years. Understanding the impact of disease on patients using health utility at different stages of ALS would allow meaningful cost-benefit analysis of new potential therapies. A common health-related quality of life measurement, developed and validated for the UK, is the EQ-5D. Using clinical trial data from the LiCALS study, we calculated health utility using the EQ-5D for each King's ALS clinical stage from 214 patients. We analysed whether health utility, and other health-related measures, significantly changed between each of the clinical stages. Results showed that mean health utility decreased by 0.487 (the scale runs from 1 to - 0.594) between clinical stages 2A and 4. Emotional states, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), showed worsening depression and anxiety scores as ALS progressed. Age of onset, disease onset, gender and treatment group were not predictors of EQ-5D, depression or anxiety. In conclusion, increasing severity of King's ALS Clinical Stage is associated with a progressive decrease in EQ-5D health utility. This is useful for cost-benefit analysis of new therapies and validates this ALS clinical staging system

Use of clinical staging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for phase 3 clinical trials

OBJECTIVES The use of clinical staging in the fatal neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis would have value in optimising future therapeutic trials. We aimed to use previous clinical trial data to determine the length of time patients spend in each of four proposed stages, its range and transition patterns to subsequent stages. METHODS Using databases from two multicentre clinical trials, patients were retrospectively staged through the trial course. At each stage we assessed whether patients then progressed to an earlier, consecutive or later stage or death. Duration spent in each stage before progression to a later stage was calculated. RESULTS There were 725 patients. No patients moved to an earlier stage. More patients at stages 1, 2 and 3 progressed to the consecutive stage rather than skipping a stage. 59.3% of patients at Stage 1 progressed to Stage 2, 54.0% of patients at Stage 2 progressed to Stage 3, 42.3% of patients at Stage 3 progressed to Stage 4 and 47.0% of Stage 4 patients progressed to death. Transition times between stages had a median duration of 3 to 7 months for stages 2 to 4. DISCUSSION We have shown using trial data that transition times between stages are short. Use of stage duration as an endpoint might allow a shorter trial duration. We have shown face validity in this system as most patients progress through consecutive stages, and none revert to earlier stages. Furthermore, we have shown the system is reliable across populations and therefore has content validity