3 research outputs found

    Ruthenophanes: Evaluating Cation−π Interactions in [Ru(η<sup>6</sup>‑C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>12</sub>R<sub>4</sub>)(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+/3+</sup> Complexes. A Computational Insight

    No full text
    The nature of cation−π interactions in a set of [Ru­(η<sup>6</sup>-C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>12</sub>R<sub>4</sub>)­(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+3+</sup> (R = F, CN, CH<sub>3</sub>, and others), complexes was investigated with Su–Li energy decomposition analysis and the natural orbitals for chemical valence and the extended transition state method EDA-NOCV. The long-distance effects of electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents as well as protonation of the <i>ipso</i> carbon on the nature of cation−π interactions were investigated. Both energy decomposition analyses, Su–Li EDA and EDA-NOCV, are in total agreement, showing that the presence of electron-donating substituents such as CH<sub>3</sub>, NH<sub>2</sub>, and H<sub>3</sub>CO tends to stabilize the ruthenium–arene interaction while electron-withdrawing substituents such as F, CN, and NO<sub>2</sub> tend to weaken such interactions. The electrostatic component of the ruthenium–arene interaction is the most affected by the substitution, despite the fact that the covalent character is much more significant than the electrostatic character. EDA-NOCV reveals that the most important orbital stabilization comes from donation and back-donation between the interacting fragments, while the σ density deformations present a moderate contribution to total orbital stabilization energy in ruthenium–arene interactions of complexes <b>1</b>–<b>8</b>

    Metal–Ligand Bonding Situation in Ruthenophanes Containing Multibridged Cyclophanes

    No full text
    Cation−π interactions in a set of ruthenophanes [Ru­(η<sup>6</sup>-C<sub><i>n</i></sub>H<sub><i>n</i></sub>)­(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<i>n</i> = 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24) (<b>1</b>–<b>9</b>), containing multibridged cyclophanes as ligands, including [2.2]­paracyclophane and its multibridged analogs, [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­cyclophanes, are analyzed in terms of SAPT0/TZP and Su–Li EDA analyses. The calculations reveal that the coordination with cation [Ru­(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> affects the structures of [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­ciclophane ligands, mainly the planarity of the coordinating ring. The EDA results show that the gradual addition of ethano bridges in [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­cyclophanes tends to strengthen the cation−π interaction between [Ru­(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> and [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­cyclophane. Both Su–Li EDA and SAPT0 are in line, suggesting that the cation−π interactions present a predominant covalent character in complexes <b>1</b>–<b>9</b>

    Metal–Ligand Bonding Situation in Ruthenophanes Containing Multibridged Cyclophanes

    No full text
    Cation−π interactions in a set of ruthenophanes [Ru­(η<sup>6</sup>-C<sub><i>n</i></sub>H<sub><i>n</i></sub>)­(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<i>n</i> = 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24) (<b>1</b>–<b>9</b>), containing multibridged cyclophanes as ligands, including [2.2]­paracyclophane and its multibridged analogs, [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­cyclophanes, are analyzed in terms of SAPT0/TZP and Su–Li EDA analyses. The calculations reveal that the coordination with cation [Ru­(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> affects the structures of [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­ciclophane ligands, mainly the planarity of the coordinating ring. The EDA results show that the gradual addition of ethano bridges in [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­cyclophanes tends to strengthen the cation−π interaction between [Ru­(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> and [2<sub><i>n</i></sub>]­cyclophane. Both Su–Li EDA and SAPT0 are in line, suggesting that the cation−π interactions present a predominant covalent character in complexes <b>1</b>–<b>9</b>
    corecore