42 research outputs found
Conversion of Aldehyde to Alkane by a Peroxoiron(III) Complex: A Functional Model for the Cyanobacterial Aldehyde-Deformylating Oxygenase
Cyanobacterial aldehyde-deformylating
oxygenase (cADO) converts
long-chain fatty aldehydes to alkanes via a proposed diferric-peroxo
intermediate that carries out the oxidative deformylation of the substrate.
Herein, we report that the synthetic ironÂ(III)-peroxo complex [Fe<sup>III</sup>(η<sup>2</sup>-O<sub>2</sub>)Â(TMC)]<sup>+</sup> (TMC
= tetramethylcyclam) causes a similar transformation in the presence
of a suitable H atom donor, thus serving as a functional model for
cADO. Mechanistic studies suggest that the H atom donor can intercept
the incipient alkyl radical formed in the oxidative deformylation
step in competition with the oxygen rebound step typically used by
most oxygenases for forming C–O bonds
Dioxygen Activation by Nonheme Diiron Enzymes: Diverse Dioxygen Adducts, High-Valent Intermediates, and Related Model Complexes
A growing
subset of metalloenzymes activates dioxygen with nonheme
diiron active sites to effect substrate oxidations that range from
the hydroxylation of methane and the desaturation of fatty acids to
the deformylation of fatty aldehydes to produce alkanes and the six-electron
oxidation of aminoarenes to nitroarenes in the biosynthesis of antibiotics.
A common feature of their reaction mechanisms is the formation of
O<sub>2</sub> adducts that evolve into more reactive derivatives such
as diironÂ(II,III)-superoxo, diironÂ(III)-peroxo, diironÂ(III,IV)-oxo,
and diironÂ(IV)-oxo species, which carry out particular substrate oxidation
tasks. In this review, we survey the various enzymes belonging to
this unique subset and the mechanisms by which substrate oxidation
is carried out. We examine the nature of the reactive intermediates,
as revealed by X-ray crystallography and the application of various
spectroscopic methods and their associated reactivity. We also discuss
the structural and electronic properties of the model complexes that
have been found to mimic salient aspects of these enzyme active sites.
Much has been learned in the past 25 years, but key questions remain
to be answered
Bioinspired Nonheme Iron Catalysts for C–H and CC Bond Oxidation: Insights into the Nature of the Metal-Based Oxidants
ConspectusRecent efforts to design synthetic iron catalysts
for the selective
and efficient oxidation of C–H and CC bonds have been
inspired by a versatile family of nonheme iron oxygenases. These bioinspired
nonheme (N4)ÂFe<sup>II</sup> catalysts use H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to oxidize substrates with high regio- and stereoselectivity, unlike
in Fenton chemistry where highly reactive but unselective hydroxyl
radicals are produced. In this Account, we highlight our efforts to
shed light on the nature of metastable peroxo intermediates, which
we have trapped at −40 °C, in the reactions of the iron
catalyst with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> under various conditions
and the high-valent species derived therefrom.Under the reaction
conditions that originally led to the discovery
of this family of catalysts, we have characterized spectroscopically
an Fe<sup>III</sup>–OOH intermediate (EPR <i>g</i><sub>max</sub> = 2.19) that leads to the hydroxylation of substrate
C–H bonds or the epoxidation and <i>cis</i>-dihydroxylation
of Cî—»C bonds. Surprisingly, these organic products show incorporation
of <sup>18</sup>O from H<sub>2</sub><sup>18</sup>O, thereby excluding
the possibility of a direct attack of the Fe<sup>III</sup>–OOH
intermediate on the substrate. Instead, a water-assisted mechanism
is implicated in which water binding to the ironÂ(III) center at a
site adjacent to the hydroperoxo ligand promotes heterolytic cleavage
of the O–O bond to generate an Fe<sup>V</sup>(O)Â(OH) oxidant.
This mechanism is supported by recent kinetic studies showing that
the Fe<sup>III</sup>–OOH intermediate undergoes exponential
decay at a rate enhanced by the addition of water and retarded by
replacement of H<sub>2</sub>O with D<sub>2</sub>O, as well as mass
spectral evidence for the Fe<sup>V</sup>(O)Â(OH) species obtained by
the Costas group.The nature of the peroxo intermediate changes
significantly when
the reactions are carried out in the presence of carboxylic acids.
Under these conditions, spectroscopic studies support the formation
of a (κ<sup>2</sup>-acylperoxo)ÂironÂ(III) species (EPR <i>g</i><sub>max</sub> = 2.58) that decays at −40 °C
in the absence of substrate to form an oxoironÂ(IV) byproduct, along
with a carboxyl radical that readily loses CO<sub>2</sub>. The alkyl
radical thus formed either reacts with O<sub>2</sub> to form benzaldehyde
(as in the case of PhCH<sub>2</sub>COOH) or rebounds with the incipient
Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O) moiety to form phenol (as in the case of C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>COOH). Substrate addition leads to its 2-e<sup>–</sup> oxidation and inhibits these side reactions. The emerging
mechanistic picture, supported by DFT calculations of Wang and Shaik,
describes a rather flat reaction landscape in which the (κ<sup>2</sup>-acylperoxo)ÂironÂ(III) intermediate undergoes O–O bond
homolysis reversibly to form an Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(<sup>•</sup>OCÂ(O)ÂR) species that decays to Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O) and RCO<sub>2</sub><sup>•</sup> or isomerizes to its Fe<sup>V</sup>(O)Â(O<sub>2</sub>CR) electromer, which effects substrate oxidation. Another
short-lived <i>S</i> = 1/2 species just discovered by Talsi
that has much less <i>g</i>-anisotropy (EPR <i>g</i><sub>max</sub> = 2.07) may represent either of these postulated high-valent
intermediates
Characterization of an O<sub>2</sub> Adduct of an Active Cobalt-Substituted Extradiol-Cleaving Catechol Dioxygenase
The first example of an O<sub>2</sub> adduct of an active
Co-substituted
oxygenase has been observed in the extradiol ring cleavage of the
electron-poor substrate 4-nitrocatechol (4NC) by CoÂ(II)-homoprotocatechuate
2,3-dioxygenase (Co-HPCD). Upon O<sub>2</sub> binding to the high-spin
CoÂ(II) (<i>S</i> = <sup>3</sup>/<sub>2</sub>) enzyme–substrate
complex, an <i>S</i> = <sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub> EPR signal
exhibiting <sup>59</sup>Co hyperfine splitting (<i>A</i> = 24 G) typical of a low-spin CoÂ(III)–superoxide complex
was observed. Both the formation and decay of the new intermediate
are very slow in comparison to the analogous steps for turnover of
4NC by native high-spin FeÂ(II)-HPCD, which is likely to remain high-spin
upon O<sub>2</sub> binding. A similar but effectively stable <i>S</i> = <sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub> intermediate was formed by
the inactive [H200N-Co-HPCDÂ(4NC)] variant. The observations presented
shed light on the key roles played by the substrate, the second-sphere
His200 residue, and the spin state of the metal center in facilitating
O<sub>2</sub> binding and activation
Rate-Determining Water-Assisted O–O Bond Cleavage of an Fe<sup>III</sup>‑OOH Intermediate in a Bio-inspired Nonheme Iron-Catalyzed Oxidation
Hydrocarbon
oxidations by bio-inspired nonheme iron catalysts and
H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> have been proposed to involve an Fe<sup>III</sup>-OOH intermediate that decays via a water-assisted mechanism
to form an Fe<sup>V</sup>(O)Â(OH) oxidant. Herein we report kinetic
evidence for this pathway in the oxidation of 1-octene catalyzed by
[Fe<sup>II</sup>(TPA)Â(NCCH<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>, TPA = trisÂ(2-pyridylmethyl)Âamine). The (TPA)ÂFe<sup>III</sup>(OOH)
intermediate <b>2</b> can be observed at −40 °C
and is found to undergo first-order decay, which is accelerated by
water. Interestingly, the decay rate of <b>2</b> is comparable
to that of product formation, indicating that the decay of <b>2</b> results in olefin oxidation. Furthermore, the Eyring activation
parameters for the decay of <b>2</b> and product formation are
identical, and both processes are associated with an H<sub>2</sub>O/D<sub>2</sub>O KIE of 2.5. Taken together with previous <sup>18</sup>O-labeling data, these results point to a water-assisted heterolytic
O–O bond cleavage of <b>2</b> as the rate-limiting step
in olefin oxidation
Equilibrating (L)Fe<sup>III</sup>–OOAc and (L)Fe<sup>V</sup>(O) Species in Hydrocarbon Oxidations by Bio-Inspired Nonheme Iron Catalysts Using H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and AcOH
Inspired by the remarkable chemistry
of the family of Rieske oxygenase
enzymes, nonheme iron complexes of tetradentate N4 ligands have been
developed to catalyze hydrocarbon oxidation reactions using H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in the presence of added carboxylic acids. The
observation that the stereo- and enantioselectivity of the oxidation
products can be modulated by the electronic and steric properties
of the acid implicates an oxidizing species that incorporates the
carboxylate moiety. Frozen solutions of these catalytic mixtures generally
exhibit EPR signals arising from two <i>S</i> = 1/2 intermediates,
a highly anisotropic g2.7 subset (<i>g</i><sub>max</sub> = 2.58 to 2.78 and Δ<i>g</i> = 0.85–1.2)
that we assign to an Fe<sup>III</sup>–OOAc species and a less
anisotropic g2.07 subset (<i>g</i> = 2.07, 2.01, and 1.96
and Δ<i>g</i> ≈ 0.11) we associate with an
Fe<sup>V</sup>(O)Â(OAc) species. Kinetic studies on the reactions of
iron complexes supported by the TPA (trisÂ(pyridyl-2-methyl)Âamine)
ligand family with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/AcOH or AcOOH at −40
°C reveal the formation of a visible chromophore at 460 nm, which
persists in a steady state phase and then decays exponentially upon
depletion of the peroxo oxidant with a rate constant that is substrate
independent. Remarkably, the duration of this steady state phase can
be modulated by the nature of the substrate and its concentration,
which is a rarely observed phenomenon. A numerical simulation of this
behavior as a function of substrate type and concentration affords
a kinetic model in which the two <i>S</i> = 1/2 intermediates
exist in a dynamic equilibrium that is modulated by the electronic
properties of the supporting ligands. This notion is supported by
EPR studies of the reaction mixtures. Importantly, these studies unambiguously
show that the g2.07 species, and not the g2.7 species, is responsible
for substrate oxidation in the (L)ÂFe<sup>II</sup>/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/AcOH catalytic system. Instead the g2.7 species appears to
be off-pathway and serves as a reservoir for the g2.07 species. These
findings will be helpful not only for the design of regio- and stereospecific
nonheme iron oxidation catalysts but also for providing insight into
the mechanisms of the remarkably versatile oxidants formed by nature’s
most potent oxygenases
C–H Bond Cleavage by Bioinspired Nonheme Oxoiron(IV) Complexes, Including Hydroxylation of <i>n</i>‑Butane
The
development of efficient and selective hydrocarbon oxidation processes
with low environmental impact remains a major challenge of the 21st
century because of the strong and apolar nature of the C–H
bond. Naturally occurring iron-containing metalloenzymes can, however,
selectively functionalize strong C–H bonds on substrates under
mild and environmentally benign conditions. The key oxidant in a number
of these transformations is postulated to possess an <i>S</i> = 2 Fe<sup>IV</sup>î—»O unit in a nonheme ligand environment.
This oxidant has been trapped and spectroscopically characterized
and its reactivity toward C–H bonds demonstrated for several
nonheme iron enzyme classes. In order to obtain insight into the structure–activity
relationships of these reactive intermediates, over 60 synthetic nonheme
Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O) complexes have been prepared in various laboratories
and their reactivities investigated. This Forum Article summarizes
the current status of efforts in the characterization of the C–H
bond cleavage reactivity of synthetic Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O) complexes
and provides a snapshot of the current understanding of factors that
control this reactivity, such as the properties of the supporting
ligands and the spin state of the iron center. In addition, new results
on the oxidation of strong C–H bonds such as those of cyclohexane
and <i>n</i>-butane by a putative <i>S</i> = 2
synthetic Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O) species that is generated in situ using
dioxygen at ambient conditions are presented
<sup>1</sup>H‑ENDOR Evidence for a Hydrogen-Bonding Interaction That Modulates the Reactivity of a Nonheme Fe<sup>IV</sup>O Unit
We report that a novel use of 35 GHz <sup>1</sup>H-ENDOR
spectroscopy
establishes the presence in <b>1</b> of an Fe<sup>IV</sup>O···H–O–Fe<sup>III</sup> hydrogen bond predicted by density functional theory computations
to generate a six-membered-ring core for <b>1</b>. The hydrogen
bond rationalizes the difference in the C–H bond cleavage reactivity
between <b>1</b> and <b>4</b>(OCH<sub>3</sub>) (where
a CH<sub>3</sub>O group has replaced the HO on the Fe<sup>III</sup> site). This result substantiates the seemingly paradoxical conclusion
that the nonheme Fe<sup>IV</sup>î—»O unit of <b>1</b> not
only has the electrophilic character required for H-atom abstraction
but also retains sufficient nucleophilic character to accept a hydrogen
bond from the Fe<sup>III</sup>–OH unit
Oxygen Atom Exchange between H<sub>2</sub>O and Non-Heme Oxoiron(IV) Complexes: Ligand Dependence and Mechanism
Detailed studies of oxygen atom exchange
(OAE) between H<sub>2</sub><sup>18</sup>O and synthetic non-heme oxoironÂ(IV)
complexes supported by tetradentate and pentadentate ligands provide
evidence that they proceed by a common mechanism but within two different
kinetic regimes, with OAE rates that span 2 orders of magnitude. The
first kinetic regime involves initial reversible water association
to the Fe<sup>IV</sup> complex, which is evidenced by OAE rates that
are linearly dependent on [H<sub>2</sub><sup>18</sup>O] and H<sub>2</sub>O/D<sub>2</sub>O KIEs of 1.6, while the second kinetic regime
involves a subsequent rate determining proton-transfer step between
the bound aqua and oxo ligands that is associated with saturation
behavior with [H<sub>2</sub><sup>18</sup>O] and much larger H<sub>2</sub>O/D<sub>2</sub>O KIEs of 5–6. [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(TMC)Â(MeCN)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>) and [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(MePy<sub>2</sub>TACN)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>9</b>) are examples of complexes that
exhibit kinetic behavior in the first regime, while [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(N4Py)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>3</b>), [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(BnTPEN)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>4</b>), [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(1Py-BnTPEN)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>5</b>), [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(3Py-BnTPEN)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>6</b>), and [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(Me<sub>2</sub>Py<sub>2</sub>TACN)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>8</b>) represent complexes that fall in the second
kinetic regime. Interestingly, [Fe<sup>IV</sup>(O)Â(PyTACN)Â(MeCN)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>7</b>) exhibits a linear [H<sub>2</sub><sup>18</sup>O] dependence below 0.6 M and saturation above 0.6 M. Analysis of
the temperature dependence of the OAE rates shows that most of these
complexes exhibit large and negative activation entropies, consistent
with the proposed mechanism. One exception is complex <b>9</b>, which has a near-zero activation entropy and is proposed to undergo
ligand-arm dissociation during the RDS to accommodate H<sub>2</sub><sup>18</sup>O binding. These results show that the observed OAE
kinetic behavior is highly dependent on the nature of the supporting
ligand and are of relevance to studies of non-heme oxoironÂ(IV) complexes
in water or acetonitrile/water mixtures for applications in photocatalysis
and water oxidation chemistry
Evaluating the Identity and Diiron Core Transformations of a (μ-Oxo)diiron(III) Complex Supported by Electron-Rich Tris(pyridyl-2-methyl)amine Ligands
The composition of a (μ-oxo)ÂdiironÂ(III) complex
coordinated
by trisÂ[(3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxy)Âpyridyl-2-methyl]Âamine (R<sub>3</sub>TPA) ligands was investigated. Characterization using a variety of
spectroscopic methods and X-ray crystallography indicated that the
reaction of ironÂ(III) perchlorate, sodium hydroxide, and R<sub>3</sub>TPA affords [Fe<sub>2</sub>(μ-O)Â(μ-OH)Â(R<sub>3</sub>TPA)<sub>2</sub>]Â(ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>2</b>) rather than
the previously reported species [Fe<sub>2</sub>(μ-O)Â(OH)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)Â(R<sub>3</sub>TPA)<sub>2</sub>]Â(ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>1</b>). Facile conversion of the (μ-oxo)Â(μ-hydroxo)ÂdiironÂ(III)
core of <b>2</b> to the (μ-oxo)Â(hydroxo)Â(aqua)ÂdiironÂ(III)
core of <b>1</b> occurs in the presence of water and at low
temperature. When <b>2</b> is exposed to wet acetonitrile at
room temperature, the CH<sub>3</sub>CN adduct is hydrolyzed to CH<sub>3</sub>COO<sup>–</sup>, which forms the compound [Fe<sub>2</sub>(μ-O)Â(μ-CH<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(R<sub>3</sub>TPA)<sub>2</sub>]Â(ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>10</b>). The identity of <b>10</b> was confirmed by comparison of its spectroscopic properties
with those of an independently prepared sample. To evaluate whether
or not <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> are capable of generating
the diironÂ(IV) species [Fe<sub>2</sub>(μ-O)Â(OH)Â(O)Â(R<sub>3</sub>TPA)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>3+</sup> (<b>4</b>), which has previously
been generated as a synthetic model for high-valent diiron protein
oxygenated intermediates, studies were performed to investigate their
reactivity with hydrogen peroxide. Because <b>2</b> reacts rapidly
with hydrogen peroxide in CH<sub>3</sub>CN but not in CH<sub>3</sub>CN/H<sub>2</sub>O, conditions that favor conversion to <b>1</b>, complex <b>1</b> is not a likely precursor to <b>4</b>. Compound <b>4</b> also forms in the reaction of <b>2</b> with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in solvents lacking a nitrile, suggesting
that hydrolysis of CH<sub>3</sub>CN is not involved in the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> activation reaction. These findings shed light on the
formation of several diiron complexes of electron-rich R<sub>3</sub>TPA ligands and elaborate on conditions required to generate synthetic
models of diironÂ(IV) protein intermediates with this ligand framework