Impact-Generated Dust Clouds Surrounding the Galilean Moons

Tenuous dust clouds of Jupiter's Galilean moons Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto have been detected with the in-situ dust detector on board the Galileo spacecraft. The majority of the dust particles have been sensed at altitudes below five radii of these lunar-sized satellites. We identify the particles in the dust clouds surrounding the moons by their impact direction, impact velocity, and mass distribution. Average particle sizes are 0.5 to $\rm 1 \mu m$, just above the detector threshold, indicating a size distribution with decreasing numbers towards bigger particles. Our results imply that the particles have been kicked up by hypervelocity impacts of micrometeoroids onto the satellites' surfaces. The measured radial dust density profiles are consistent with predictions by dynamical modeling for satellite ejecta produced by interplanetary impactors (Krivov et al., PSS, 2003, 51, 251--269), assuming yield, mass and velocity distributions of the ejecta from laboratory measurements. The dust clouds of the three outer Galilean moons have very similar properties and are in good agreement with the model predictions for solid ice-silicate surfaces. The dust density in the vicinity of Io, however, is more than an order of magnitude lower than expected from theory. This may be due to a softer, fluffier surface of Io (volcanic deposits) as compared to the other moons. The log-log slope of the dust number density in the clouds vs. distance from the satellite center ranges between --1.6 and --2.8. Appreciable variations of number densities obtained from individual flybys with varying geometry, especially at Callisto, might be indicative of leading-trailing asymmetries of the clouds due to the motion of the moons with respect to the field of impactors.Comment: Icarus, in press, 46 pages, 16 figures, 5 table

Increasing planet-stirring efficiency of debris disks by "projectile stirring" and "resonant stirring"

Extrasolar debris disks are detected by observing dust, which is thought to be released during planetesimal collisions. This implies that planetesimals are dynamically excited ("stirred"), such that collisions are sufficiently common and violent. The most frequently considered stirring mechanisms are self-stirring by disk self-gravity, and planet-stirring via secular interactions. However, these models face problems when considering disk mass, self-gravity, and planet eccentricity, leading to the possibility that other, unexplored mechanisms instead stir debris. We hypothesize that planet-stirring could be more efficient than the traditional secular model implies, due to two additional mechanisms. First, a planet at the inner edge of a debris disk can scatter massive bodies onto eccentric, disk-crossing orbits, which then excite debris ("projectile stirring"). Second, a planet can stir debris over a wide region via broad mean-motion resonances, both at and between nominal resonance locations ("resonant stirring"). Both mechanisms can be effective even for low-eccentricity planets, unlike secular-planet-stirring. We run N-body simulations across a broad parameter space, to determine the viability of these new stirring mechanisms. We quantify stirring levels using a bespoke program for assessing Rebound debris simulations, which we make publicly available. We find that even low-mass projectiles can stir disks, and verify this with a simple analytic criterion. We also show that resonant stirring is effective for planets above ~0.5 MJup. By proving that these mechanisms can increase planet-stirring efficiency, we demonstrate that planets could still be stirring debris disks even in cases where conventional (secular) planet-stirring is insufficient.Comment: 21 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in MNRA