Clearance of jaundice after the modified Kasai`s operation predicts survival outcomes in patients with biliary atresia

The aim of this study was to assess the probability of survival with native liver (SNL) and the rate of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) as well as their potential risk factors, in patients diagnosed with Biliary Atresia (BA), who underwent the hepaticoportoenterostomy (HPE) by retrospectively reviewing medical records between 2007 and 2016. The subjects were classified as poor outcomes if they died or a liver transplant (LT) was performed. A total of 73 cases were enrolled. The average age at HPE was 106.2 +/- 58.5 days. Poor outcome was observed in 27.4%, 54.8% survived with native liver and 17.8% were lost to follow-up. The principal cause of death was sepsis, followed by massive upper GI hemorrhage. The overall 10-year SNL was 66.8%. Only total bilirubin (TB) > 3 mg/dL at 3, 6 months after HPE and presence of associated anomalies negatively affected SNL (p=0.0155, 0.0042 and 0.001, respectively). Most of the patients experienced EVB within 3 years of age, in which TB > 9 mg/dL at 12 months after HPE was significantly associated with probability of the EVB outcome. Any interventions to improve jaundice clearance after HPE should be strongly pursued in order to improve outcomes in BA patients, particularly in centers where liver transplantation (LT) is not available. Surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy around the age of 1.5 years in patients having TB > 9 mg/dL may be beneficial to identify large varices having potential fatal bleeding

External Validation of the TERMINAL-24 Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Multiple Trauma

Objective: A prediction model: "TERMINAL-24,” was developed and internally validated for use in predicting early mortality of multiple trauma patients in the Emergency Department. In this study this model's external validity and generalizability was evaluated. Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort was used for the construction of two datasets. Temporal external validation used the dataset from the same location at a different period, and geographic external validation used the dataset from a different location. Results: In total, 1,932 patients underwent temporal external validation, with 14 (0.7%) patients dyeing within 8 hours, 35 (1.8%) patients died between 8 and 24 hours, and 1,883(97.5%) patients were alive at 24 hours. From this, 2,336 patients were eligible for geographical external validation, with 106 (4.5%) patients having died at the emergency room, 143 (6.1%) patients died in hospital and 2,087 (89.3%) patients survived. The TERMINAL-24 score was applied to both datasets, with a benchmark of 4 or higher (range 0-5). In the temporal dataset, this score showed a mortality of greater than 20% (specificity 0.97) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) 0.91 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85-0.96); whereas, it demonstrated a mortality of greater than 60% (specificity 0.99) AuROC 0.92 (95%CI 0.89-0.94) in the geographical dataset. Conclusion: TERMINAL-24 was effective at predicting early death in the emergency room. It was successfully implemented within the same hospital; hoever, the cut-point should be adapted for application in other institutions with unspecified time of death. Prospective studies at different hospitals should be planned to generalize this scoring system for clinical practice

Mortality from gastrointestinal congenital anomalies at 264 hospitals in 74 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study

Summary Background Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of mortality in children younger than 5 years globally. Many gastrointestinal congenital anomalies are fatal without timely access to neonatal surgical care, but few studies have been done on these conditions in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared outcomes of the seven most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries globally, and identified factors associated with mortality. Methods We did a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of patients younger than 16 years, presenting to hospital for the first time with oesophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal atresia, gastroschisis, exomphalos, anorectal malformation, and Hirschsprung’s disease. Recruitment was of consecutive patients for a minimum of 1 month between October, 2018, and April, 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, clinical status, interventions, and outcomes using the REDCap platform. Patients were followed up for 30 days after primary intervention, or 30 days after admission if they did not receive an intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality for all conditions combined and each condition individually, stratified by country income status. We did a complete case analysis. Findings We included 3849 patients with 3975 study conditions (560 with oesophageal atresia, 448 with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 681 with intestinal atresia, 453 with gastroschisis, 325 with exomphalos, 991 with anorectal malformation, and 517 with Hirschsprung’s disease) from 264 hospitals (89 in high-income countries, 166 in middleincome countries, and nine in low-income countries) in 74 countries. Of the 3849 patients, 2231 (58·0%) were male. Median gestational age at birth was 38 weeks (IQR 36–39) and median bodyweight at presentation was 2·8 kg (2·3–3·3). Mortality among all patients was 37 (39·8%) of 93 in low-income countries, 583 (20·4%) of 2860 in middle-income countries, and 50 (5·6%) of 896 in high-income countries (p<0·0001 between all country income groups). Gastroschisis had the greatest difference in mortality between country income strata (nine [90·0%] of ten in lowincome countries, 97 [31·9%] of 304 in middle-income countries, and two [1·4%] of 139 in high-income countries; p≤0·0001 between all country income groups). Factors significantly associated with higher mortality for all patients combined included country income status (low-income vs high-income countries, risk ratio 2·78 [95% CI 1·88–4·11], p<0·0001; middle-income vs high-income countries, 2·11 [1·59–2·79], p<0·0001), sepsis at presentation (1·20 [1·04–1·40], p=0·016), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at primary intervention (ASA 4–5 vs ASA 1–2, 1·82 [1·40–2·35], p<0·0001; ASA 3 vs ASA 1–2, 1·58, [1·30–1·92], p<0·0001]), surgical safety checklist not used (1·39 [1·02–1·90], p=0·035), and ventilation or parenteral nutrition unavailable when needed (ventilation 1·96, [1·41–2·71], p=0·0001; parenteral nutrition 1·35, [1·05–1·74], p=0·018). Administration of parenteral nutrition (0·61, [0·47–0·79], p=0·0002) and use of a peripherally inserted central catheter (0·65 [0·50–0·86], p=0·0024) or percutaneous central line (0·69 [0·48–1·00], p=0·049) were associated with lower mortality. Interpretation Unacceptable differences in mortality exist for gastrointestinal congenital anomalies between lowincome, middle-income, and high-income countries. Improving access to quality neonatal surgical care in LMICs will be vital to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 of ending preventable deaths in neonates and children younger than 5 years by 2030

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal technique versus open inguinal herniotomy in children: historical controlled intervention study

Objective To compare surgical outcomes of percutaneous extraperitoneal simple purse string method of laparoscopic hernia (LH) repair with a traditional open inguinal hernia (OH) repair in children with indirect inguinal hernia in a single center.Methods This study is a historical-controlled intervention study of two groups of patients: patients in the controlled group had OH repair performed from January 2016 to December 2017, and patients in the study group had LH repair from January 2018 to December 2019 at a single institution. Outcomes of the OH and LH groups, in terms of operative time, recurrence, complications, incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) and contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV) were analyzed.Results Three hundred and five patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 95 cases underwent laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure herniotomy (LH group), and 210 cases underwent conventional open herniotomy (OH group). In terms of operative time, only unilateral herniotomy in females of the OH group was significantly less than that of the LH group (15.7±7.1 vs 20.5±7.4 min, p=0.004). No significant difference in overall complication was observed between the two groups of patients. The incidence of CPPV in the LH group was 15.7% (15/95), and MCIH in OH group was 10.9% (23/210).Conclusions Laparoscopic herniotomy may prevent the need for a second operation of metachronous contralateral hernia. Both open and laparoscopic techniques are equivalent in pro and cons