151 research outputs found
Packing 3-vertex paths in claw-free graphs and related topics
An L-factor of a graph G is a spanning subgraph of G whose every component is
a 3-vertex path. Let v(G) be the number of vertices of G and d(G) the
domination number of G. A claw is a graph with four vertices and three edges
incident to the same vertex. A graph is claw-free if it has no induced subgraph
isomorphic to a claw. Our results include the following. Let G be a 3-connected
claw-free graph, x a vertex in G, e = xy an edge in G, and P a 3-vertex path in
G. Then
(a1) if v(G) = 0 mod 3, then G has an L-factor containing (avoiding) e, (a2)
if v(G) = 1 mod 3, then G - x has an L-factor, (a3) if v(G) = 2 mod 3, then G -
{x,y} has an L-factor, (a4) if v(G) = 0 mod 3 and G is either cubic or
4-connected, then G - P has an L-factor, (a5) if G is cubic with v(G) > 5 and E
is a set of three edges in G, then G - E has an L-factor if and only if the
subgraph induced by E in G is not a claw and not a triangle, (a6) if v(G) = 1
mod 3, then G - {v,e} has an L-factor for every vertex v and every edge e in G,
(a7) if v(G) = 1 mod 3, then there exist a 4-vertex path N and a claw Y in G
such that G - N and G - Y have L-factors, and (a8) d(G) < v(G)/3 +1 and if in
addition G is not a cycle and v(G) = 1 mod 3, then d(G) < v(G)/3.
We explore the relations between packing problems of a graph and its line
graph to obtain some results on different types of packings. We also discuss
relations between L-packing and domination problems as well as between induced
L-packings and the Hadwiger conjecture.
Keywords: claw-free graph, cubic graph, vertex disjoint packing, edge
disjoint packing, 3-vertex factor, 3-vertex packing, path-factor, induced
packing, graph domination, graph minor, the Hadwiger conjecture.Comment: 29 page
Packing 3-vertex paths in cubic 3-connected graphs
Let v(G) and p(G) be the number of vertices and the maximum number of
disjoint 3-vertex paths in G, respectively. We discuss the following old
Problem: Is the following claim (P) true ?
(P) if G is a 3-connected and cubic graph, then p(G) = [v(G)/3], where
[v(G)/3] is the floor of v(G)/3.
We show, in particular, that claim (P) is equivalent to some seemingly
stronger claims. It follows that if claim (P) is true, then Reed's dominating
graph conjecture (see [14]) is true for cubic 3-connected graphs.Comment: 24 pages and 11 figure
On Hamiltonicity of {claw, net}-free graphs
An st-path is a path with the end-vertices s and t. An s-path is a path with
an end-vertex s. The results of this paper include necessary and sufficient
conditions for a {claw, net}-free graph G with given two different vertices s,
t and an edge e to have (1)a Hamiltonian s-path, (2) a Hamiltonian st-path, (3)
a Hamiltonian s- and st-paths containing edge e when G has connectivity one,
and (4) a Hamiltonian cycle containing e when G is 2-connected. These results
imply that a connected {claw, net}-free graph has a Hamiltonian path and a
2-connected {claw, net}-free graph has a Hamiltonian cycle [D. Duffus, R.J.
Gould, M.S. Jacobson, Forbidden Subgraphs and the Hamiltonian Theme, in The
Theory and Application of Graphs (Kalamazoo, Mich., 1980$), Wiley, New York
(1981) 297--316.] Our proofs of (1)-(4) are shorter than the proofs of their
corollaries in [D. Duffus, R.J. Gould, M.S. Jacobson] and provide
polynomial-time algorithms for solving the corresponding Hamiltonicity
problems.
Keywords: graph, claw, net, {claw, net}-free graph, Hamiltonian path,
Hamiltonian cycle, polynomial-time algorithm.Comment: 9 page
- …