Comparison of Continuous positive airway pressure versus High flow nasal cannula for Oral feeding Preterm infants (CHOmP): randomized pilot study

Objective: To assess the feasibility of conducting a study comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or heated, humidified, high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) on oral feeding in preterm infants. Study design: Randomized controlled pilot study in a level III NICU, of infants’ born ≤28°/7 weeks who at 34°/7 weeks post menstrual age (PMA) were dependent on noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Infants were randomized evenly to nCPAP or HHHFNC groups and orally fed on low-flow oxygen. The primary outcomes of enrollment and retention were assessed. Results: We enrolled 40 infants and 12 completed the study in the nCPAP group versus 13 in the HHHFNC group. Using our respiratory and feeding protocols, we showed overall enrollment and retention rates (95%CI) at 0.66 (0.54, 0.77) and 0.63 (0.48, 0.78), respectively. Breastfeeding rates were 82% in the nCPAP group and 76% in the HHHFNC group. Infants in the HHHFNC group reached full feeds 7 days earlier than those in the nCPAP group Conclusions: Based on our retention rate, an adequately powered randomized controlled trial can be performed to confirm or refute that HHHFNC is associated with achieving oral feeds earlier. Trial registration: United States National Library of Medicine (www.clinicaltrials.gov) Identifier: NCT02055339. First posted 2/5/2014.</p

Characterizing the mental health and functioning of Canadian respiratory therapists during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) appear to be at increased risk for negative psychological outcomes [e.g. depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), moral distress] and associated impacts on functioning throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. HCPs working on designated COVID-19 units may be further impacted than their colleagues not on these units given added demands of patient care and risk of contracting COVID-19. Little is known, however, about the mental health and functioning of specific professional groups beyond nurses and physicians, including respiratory therapists (RTs), over the course of the pandemic. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study was to characterize the mental health and functioning of Canadian RTs and compare profiles between RTs working on and off designated COVID-19 units. Methods: Canadian RTs completed an online survey between February and June 2021, including demographic information (e.g. age, sex, gender,) and measures of depression, anxiety, stress, PTSD, moral distress and functional impairment. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses and between-groups comparisons were conducted to characterize RTs and compare profiles between those on and off COVID-19 units. Results: Two hundred and eighteen (N = 218) RTs participated in this study. The estimated response rate was relatively low (6.2%) Approximately half of the sample endorsed clinically relevant symptoms of depression (52%), anxiety (51%) and stress (54%) and one in three (33%) screened positively for potential PTSD. All symptoms correlated positively with functional impairment (p's p Conclusion: Moral distress and symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and PTSD were prevalent among Canadian RTs and were associated with functional impacts. These results must be interpreted with caution given a low response rate, yet raise concern regarding the long-term impacts of pandemic service among RTs. Research on RTs’ mental health prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic is scant, especially in comparison to other HCPs.RTs in the present study reported experiencing moral distress and clinically significant symptoms of depression, anxiety and PTSD, with associated functional impairment.One in three RTs screened positive for likely PTSD on the PCL-5.There is a need to provide RTs with adequate mental health supports and to understand the long-term impacts of pandemic service among RTs. Research on RTs’ mental health prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic is scant, especially in comparison to other HCPs. RTs in the present study reported experiencing moral distress and clinically significant symptoms of depression, anxiety and PTSD, with associated functional impairment. One in three RTs screened positive for likely PTSD on the PCL-5. There is a need to provide RTs with adequate mental health supports and to understand the long-term impacts of pandemic service among RTs.</p