5 research outputs found
Glycerol Hydrogenolysis to Propylene Glycol and Ethylene Glycol on Zirconia Supported Noble Metal Catalysts
Monoclinic
zirconia (m-ZrO2) supported Ru, Rh, Pt, and
Pd nanoparticles with controlled sizes were prepared and examined
in glycerol hydrogenolysis to propylene glycol and ethylene glycol
at similar conversions in the kinetic regime. Their activity (normalized
per exposed surface metal atom, i.e., turnover rate) and selectivity
depend sensitively on the nature of the noble metals and their particle
size. At a similar size (ca. 2 nm), Ru exhibited a greater turnover
rate than Rh, Pt, and Pd, and the rate decreased in the sequence Ru ≫
Rh > Pt > Pd by a factor of about 25 (from 0.035 to 0.0014 mol
glycerol
(mol surface metal·s)−1) at 473 K and 6.0 MPa
H2. Following such activity sequence, Ru was more prone
to catalyze excessive cleavage of C–C bonds, leading to the
formation of ethylene glycol and methane, while Pd exhibited the highest
selectivity to cleavage of C–O bonds to propylene glycol. Similarly,
larger Ru particles possessed higher glycerol hydrogenolysis activity
concurrently with higher selectivities to ethylene glycol and especially
methane at the expense of propylene glycol in the range of 1.8–4.5
nm. Analysis of kinetics and thermodynamics for the proposed elementary
steps involving kinetically relevant glycerol dehydrogenation to glyceraldehyde
leads to expressions of glycerol hydrogenolysis rate and selectivity
to cleavage of C–O bonds relative to C–C bonds. Together
with different effects of reaction temperature and atmosphere of H2 and N2 on the activity and selectivity for Ru/m-ZrO2 and Pt/m-ZrO2, these results suggest that the
observed difference for different noble metals and particle sizes
can be attributed to the difference in the strength of adsorption
of glycerol and glyceraldehyde, derived from their different availability
of unoccupied d orbitals
In Situ Generation of Radical Coke and the Role of Coke-Catalyst Contact on Coke Oxidation
A thermogravimetric
analyzer (TGA) equipped for flowing hydrocarbon
gases allowed in situ deposition of coke on catalyst and support samples
with excellent coke-catalyst contact. The coke deposition on the catalysts
and supports, which occurs via a gas phase radical mechanism, depends
on the reaction time, temperature, hydrocarbon concentration, and
sample external surface area but not on the chemical composition of
the support under the conditions used. The coke samples, including
in situ generated samples and an industrial coke sample, are characterized
quantitatively by both deconvolution of Raman spectra and temperature-programmed
oxidation (TPO) analyses. Thermal aging of coke is shown to be effective
in increasing the hardness of the coke samples. Ceria dispersed on
α-alumina, used as a model catalyst for coke oxidation, allows
coke oxidation at lower temperatures. Using these catalysts, coke
deposited in situ is shown to oxidize similarly to ground (tight contact
conditions) coked catalyst samples, suggesting that in situ coke deposition
in the TGA can be used to generate samples with realistic coke-catalyst
contacting, as might be found in an industrial reactor or catalyst
bed. In situ coking is also observed to be reproducible and reliable
as compared to loose and tight contact methodologies
Influence of Dioxygen on the Promotional Effect of Bi during Pt-Catalyzed Oxidation of 1,6-Hexanediol
A series of carbon-supported, Bi-promoted
Pt catalysts with various
Bi/Pt atomic ratios was prepared by selectively depositing Bi on Pt
nanoparticles. The catalysts were evaluated for 1,6-hexanediol oxidation
activity in aqueous solvent under different dioxygen pressures. The
rate of diol oxidation on the basis of Pt loading over a Bi-promoted
catalyst was 3 times faster than that of an unpromoted Pt catalyst
under 0.02 MPa of O<sub>2</sub>, whereas the unpromoted catalyst was
more active than the promoted catalyst under 1 MPa of O<sub>2</sub>. After liquid-phase catalyst pretreatment and 1,6-hexanediol oxidation,
migration of Bi on the carbon support was observed. The reaction order
in O<sub>2</sub> was 0 over Bi-promoted Pt/C in comparison to 0.75
over unpromoted Pt/C in the range of 0.02–0.2 MPa of O<sub>2</sub>. Under low O<sub>2</sub> pressure, rate measurements in D<sub>2</sub>O instead of H<sub>2</sub>O solvent revealed a moderate kinetic
isotope effect (rate<sub>H<sub>2</sub>O</sub>/rate<sub>D<sub>2</sub>O</sub>) on 1,6-hexanediol oxidation over Pt/C (KIE = 1.4), whereas
a negligible effect was observed on Bi-Pt/C (KIE = 0.9), indicating
that the promotional effect of Bi could be related to the formation
of surface hydroxyl groups from the reaction of dioxygen and water.
No significant change in product distribution or catalyst stability
was observed with Bi promotion, regardless of the dioxygen pressure
Formation and Oxidation/Gasification of Carbonaceous Deposits: A Review
A wide
variety of hydrocarbon processes, catalytic or noncatalytic,
involve the formation of carbon deposits, either on catalysts or on
reactor (or engine/exhaust) surfaces. Therefore, researchers have
developed a large array of catalysts to aid the combustion of these
deposits. Recently, the mechanism of catalytic carbon oxidation and/or
gasification has been the focus of research in an attempt to design
better catalysts for carbon removal. With this approach, understanding
the mechanism of formation of different types of carbon deposits is
desired. Efforts undertaken for studying oxidation or gasification
of various forms of carbon deposits are discussed in this review,
along with the techniques used to study the mechanism of oxidation/gasification.
The kinetics of catalyzed and noncatalytic carbon oxidation are described
in detail. The effect of reactive gases such as NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, water vapor, CO<sub>2</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> on the gasification
behavior of carbon deposits is also discussed. Reaction rates of oxidation/gasification
of carbon under different operating conditions have been calculated,
allowing for a comprehensive overview of carbon removal reactivity
