Phase estimation via number-conserving operation inside the SU(1,1) interferometer

Utilizing nonlinear elements, SU(1,1) interferometers demonstrate superior phase sensitivity compared to passive interferometers. However, the precision is significantly impacted by photon losses, particularly internal losses. We propose a theoretical scheme to improve the precision of phase measurement using homodyne detection by implementing number-conserving operations (PA-then-PS and PS-then-PA) within the SU(1,1) interferometer, with the coherent state and the vacuum state as the input states. We analyze the effects of number-conserving operations on the phase sensitivity, the quantum Fisher information, and the quantum Cramer-Rao bound under both ideal and photon losses scenarios. Our findings reveal that the internal non-Gaussian operations can enhance the phase sensitivity and the quantum Fisher information, and effectively improve the robustness of the SU(1,1) interferometer against internal photon losses. Notably, the PS-then-PA scheme exhibits superior improvement in both ideal and photon losses cases in terms of phase sensitivity. Moreover, in the ideal case, PA-then-PS scheme slightly outperforms PS-then-PA scheme in terms of the quantum Fisher information and the Quantum Cramer-Rao. However, in the presence of photon losses, PS-then-PA scheme demonstrates a greater advantage.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2311.1461

Phase sensitivity of an SU(1,1) interferometer in photon-loss via photon operations

We study the phase sensitivity of an SU(1,1) interferometer with photon loss by using three different photon operations schemes, i.e., performing photon-addition operation on the input port of the SU(1,1) interferometer (Scheme A), the interior of SU(1,1) interferometer (Scheme B), and both of them (Scheme C). We compare the performance of the three schemes in phase estimation by performing the same times of photon-addition operation to the mode b. The results show that Scheme B improves the phase sensitivity best in ideal case, and Scheme C performs well against internal loss, especially in the case of strong loss. All the three schemes can beat the standard quantum limit in the presence of photon loss, but Scheme B and Scheme C can break through the standard quantum limit in a larger loss range.</jats:p