75 research outputs found

    Etiquette for medical students email communication with faculty members: a single-institution study

    Get PDF
    This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.Abstract Background Email is widely used as a means of communication between faculty members and students in medical education because of its practical and educational advantages. However, because of the distinctive nature of medical education, students inappropriate email etiquette may adversely affect their learning as well as faculty members perception of them. Little data on medical students competency in professional email writing is available; therefore, this study explored the strengths and weaknesses of medical students email etiquette and factors that contribute to professional email writing. Methods A total of 210 emails from four faculty members at Seoul National University College of Medicine were collected. An evaluation criteria and a scoring rubric were developed based on the various email-writing guidelines. The rubric comprised 10 items, including nine items for evaluation related to the email components and one item for the assessment of global impression of politeness. Three evaluators independently assessed all emails according to the criteria. Results Students were identified as being 61.0 % male and 52.8 % were in the undergraduate-entry program. The sum of each component score was 62.21 out of 100 and the mean value for global impression was 2.6 out of 4. The results demonstrated that students email etiquettes remained low-to-mediocre for most criteria, except for readability and honorifics. Three criteria, salutation (r=0.668), closing (r=0.653), and sign-off (r=0.646), showed a strong positive correlation with the global impression of politeness. Whether a student entered a graduate-entry program or an undergraduate-entry program significantly contributed to professional email writing after other variables were controlled. Conclusions Although students in the graduate-entry program demonstrated a relatively superior level of email etiquette, the majority of medical students did not write emails professionally. Educating all medical students in email etiquette may well contribute to the improvement of student–faculty relationships as well as their email writing

    Real-Time Inference With 2D Convolutional Neural Networks on Field Programmable Gate Arrays for High-Rate Particle Imaging Detectors

    No full text
    We present a custom implementation of a 2D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) as a viable application for real-time data selection in high-resolution and high-rate particle imaging detectors, making use of hardware acceleration in high-end Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). To meet FPGA resource constraints, a two-layer CNN is optimized for accuracy and latency with KerasTuner, and network quantization is further used to minimize the computing resource utilization of the network. We use “High Level Synthesis for Machine Learning” (hls4ml) tools to test CNN deployment on a Xilinx UltraScale+ FPGA, which is an FPGA technology proposed for use in the front-end readout system of the future Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) particle detector. We evaluate network accuracy and estimate latency and hardware resource usage, and comment on the feasibility of applying CNNs for real-time data selection within the currently planned DUNE data acquisition system. This represents the first-ever exploration of employing 2D CNNs on FPGAs for DUNE.</jats:p

    Post-traumatic Bilateral Facial Paralysis: A Case Report

    Full text link

    Abstract 5209: Hyperprogression in various solid cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the real world

    Full text link
    Abstract Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the cancer prognosis in various cancer types. However, ICIs may trigger accelerated tumor progression, regarded as hyperprogressive disease (HPD), in certain patients, and it is still challenging to define HPD. We aimed to investigate the landscape of HPD and the prognostic value of its different definitions in advanced solid cancer patients treated with ICIs. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective cohort study for solid cancer patients receiving ICIs. Among them, only unresectable or metastatic cancer patients were included in this analysis. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1. In patients who showed progressive disease (PD) by RECIST 1.1 at the first tumor evaluation, HPD was defined according to the following three criteria: A) tumor growth kinetics (TGK) ratio (TGKpost-ICI/TGKpre-ICI &amp;gt;=2, B) &amp;gt;=10mm increase in sum of target lesion (SUMtarget)and at least one of the following two criteria - 1) &amp;gt;=40% increase in SUMtarget or 2) &amp;gt;=20% increase in SUMtarget and the appearance of new lesions in at least two different organs, C) TGK ratio &amp;gt;=2 and &amp;gt;50% increase in SUMtarget. The discriminatory ability of three definitions in terms of overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the chi-square, C-statistics, and prediction error with integrated Brier score. Results: A total of 427 patients were included; head and neck (n=22, 5.2%), lung (n=173, 40.5%), breast (n=8, 1.9%), gastrointestinal tract (n=99, 23.2%), hepatobiliary pancreas (n=57, 13.3%), genitourinary (n=56, 13.1%), melanoma (n=5, 1.2%), and others (n=7, 1.6%). Incidences of HPD were 4.9%, 14.8%, and 11.5% in definition A, B, C, respectively. The incidence of HPD was relatively low (2.7%-9.5%) in non-small cell lung cancer compared to other cancer types (10.1%-21.5% in esophagogastric cancer, 3.9%-21.6% in hepatobiliary pancreas cancer, and 5.5%-22.5% in genitourinary cancer). Median OS was the worst for patients with HPD, which ranged from 4.8 months to 4.9 months according to definition A-C. After multivariate analysis adjusting for cancer types, ICIs types, and the number of prior anti-cancer therapy, each definition remained a significant factor for OS (P&amp;lt;0.001, respectively). Both chi-square and C-statistics of definition B were higher than those of definition A and C, although prediction error with integrated brier scores was similar between three definitions. Conclusions: Incidences of HPD appear to be various according to its definitions and cancer types. Given that the RECIST-based definition B not requiring pre-ICI imaging, showed similar discriminatory ability to predict dismal OS compared to TGK-based ones, it may be the most feasible and convenient measure to capture HPD in daily clinical practice. Citation Format: Jwa Hoon Kim, Soohyeon Lee, Min Hee Hong, Jee Hyun Kim, Eun Joo Kang, Tae-Yong Kim, Yeon Hee Park, Ji-Youn Han, Il-Hwan Kim, Sang-We Kim, Dae Ho Lee, Jae Lyun Lee, Jae Cheol Lee, Chang-Min Choi, Changhoon Yoo, Shinkyo Yoon, Jae Ho Jeong, Seyoung Seo, Sun Young Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Sook Ryun Park. Hyperprogression in various solid cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the real world [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5209.</jats:p
    corecore