14,459 research outputs found
Beyond Basic Needs: Social Support and Structure for Successful Offender Reentry
Barriers to successful reentry have long been identified as impeding an offenderâs ability to successfully reenter society upon release from incarceration. As a result, research has long examined what shared obstacles the majority of offenders often face upon reentering society. Much of the research identifies factors such as poor education, obtaining/maintaining employment, stable housing, and transportation as common barriers to successful reentry. By using in-depth interviews with ex-offenders deemed as successful that were conducted by two respective non-profit agencies, the present study explores what significant requirements, if any, successful offenders perceive to need and/or have experienced as lacking while attempting to successfully reenter society. Findings from this study highlight that many of the research- identified needs are not major barriers because they are often provided for by various non-profit agencies. Furthermore, successful ex-offenders overwhelmingly identify poor social support as a major barrier that oftentimes remains neglected in government and non-profit organizational programming
The Impacts of Political Policies, Criminality, and Money on the Criminal Justice System in the United States
As Convict Criminologists we draw upon our experiential knowledge as prisoners held within the American criminal justice system. That experience provides us with a substantial emersion within the material conditions of life within prison as politics, criminality, and the impact of money substantially altered the criminal justice system in the USA that surrounded and controlled our lives. Combined, our experience goes back to the 1970s as convicts, then up to the present as academic faculty and researchers. We review what we believe is the best evidence that explains the inter-relationships between policies (political), criminality and money, and their age-old dance with race, class, and ethnicity in the United States. We first provide a general introduction outlining our research, followed by the historical overview of core policy changes that led to the vast expansion of corrections and their social impacts. Then we take a closer look at research examining intersections of race, money, and politics in USA on drug and crime polices. Conclusions follow
Redemption from the Inside-Out: The Power of Faith-Based Programming
Prisons are tense, cheerless, and often degrading places in which all inmates struggle to maintain their equilibrium despite violence, exploitation, lack of privacy, stringent limitations on family and community contacts, and a paucity of opportunities for meaningful education, work, or other productive activities. As a general matter, prisoners come to see prison as their home and try to make the most of the limited resources available in prison; they establish daily routines that allow them to find meaning and purpose in their prison lives, lives that might otherwise seem empty and hopeless. The resilience shown by prisoners should not be construed as an argument for more or longer prison sentences or for more punitive regimes of confinement, but rather is a reminder that human beings can find meaning in adversity. Prisons are meant to be settings of adversity but should strive to accommodate the human needs of their inhabitants and to promote constructive changes in behavior. Here, there are programmatic offerings that may provide prisoners with the hope, skills, and empowerment necessary to overcome barriers to achievement and success as human beings in any social context. A current line of inquiry has focused on faith based prison programs and the potential benefits that a deepened spiritual life might have on coping with the doing time experience, changing old lifestyles, and reducing the likelihood of people returning to prison. These points will be explored throughout this chapter
Keck Spectroscopy of Faint 3 < z < 7 Lyman Break Galaxies: III. The Mean Ultraviolet Spectrum at z=4
We present and discuss the mean rest-frame ultraviolet spectrum for a sample
of 81 Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) selected to be B-band dropouts with a mean
redshift of z=3.9 and apparent magnitudes z_AB<26. Most of the individual
spectra are drawn from our ongoing survey in the GOODS fields with the Keck
DEIMOS spectrograph, and we have augmented our sample with published data taken
with FORS2 on the VLT. In general we find similar trends in the spectral
diagnostics to those found in the earlier, more extensive survey of LBGs at z=3
undertaken by Shapley et al (2003). Specifically, we find low-ionization
absorption lines which trace the presence of neutral outflowing gas are weaker
in galaxies with stronger Lyman-alpha emission, bluer UV spectral slopes, lower
stellar masses, lower UV luminosities and smaller half-light radii. This is
consistent with a physical picture whereby star formation drives outflows of
neutral gas which scatters Lyman-alpha and gives rise to strong low-ionization
absorption lines, while increasing the stellar mass, size, metallicity, and
dust content of galaxies. Typical galaxies are thus expected to have stronger
Lyman-alpha emission and weaker low-ionization absorption at earlier times
(higher redshifts). Indeed, our mean spectrum at z=4 shows somewhat weaker
low-ionization absorption lines than at z=3 and available data at higher
redshift indicates a rapid decrease in low-ionization absorption strength with
redshift. We argue that the reduced low-ionization absorption is likely caused
by a decrease in the covering fraction and/or velocity range of outflowing
neutral gas at earlier epochs. Our continuing survey will enable us to extend
these diagnostics more reliably to higher redshift and determine the
implications for the escape fraction of ionizing photons which governs the role
of early galaxies in cosmic reionization. [Abridged]Comment: 17 pages, 12 figures, submitted to ApJ. Comments welcom
Public Attitudes Toward Crime and Incarceration in Finland
The following paper provides insights into Finlandâs criminal justice system and discusses the policies that emphasize using prison for rehabilitation, not merely for punishment. These methods of prevention and rehabilitation, in conjunction with correctional and educational staff within and outside the prison walls, have contributed to consistently low recidivism rates in Finland. This study discusses many ideological similarities between public opinions towards criminals and crime in Finland and the United States. Like Americans, Finns are intolerant of crime and violence, yet open to the idea of alternative forms of punishment, especially for non-violent and juvenile offenders. People in both countries tend to believe criminals are not born into a criminal life and that societal factors play a role in creating criminal behavior. This study sheds light on both the public support for ex-offendersâ rehabilitation in Finland and the extent to which Americans support alternative forms of punishment. It also provides a narrative of the disconnect between public opinion and what public officials think public opinion is
Exoffender Accounts of Successful Reentry from Prison
Reentry research often focuses on those who have recidivated, with little work addressing the experiences of those who successfully reintegrate into their communities. This study examines individual accounts of successful transitions from prison to community in the months and years postrelease. Interview data point to three metanarratives used to make sense of reentry: as reverence, as reunification, and as reconstruction. In different ways, each narrative centers on connections to important others through faith, family, or community. We discuss the legitimacy of the self-narratives offered, and add to a growing body of work exploring reentry via the lens of the exoffender
Convict Criminology and the Struggle for Inclusion
Convict Criminology (CC) began in the early 1990s as a reaction to the then current state of academic criminology that did not adequately reflect the voices of convicted felons. Since its beginnings, CC has attempted to draw attention to a range of problems created by the criminal justice apparatus and defenders of the status quo. Dr. Joanne Belknapâs 2014 ASC presidential address and subsequent article presented an argument that stressed the importance of activism to be considered as part of criminological research. In the process, she reviewed her career and then criticized the field of Critical Criminology, in particular Convict Criminology. The article, however, ignored the numerous efforts that CC has engaged in to build an inclusive group school, movement, organization and network that includes the diverse voices of Ph.D. educated convicts and excons, and overall reflected a superficial understanding of the history and intent of Convict Criminology. This article attempts to explain the shortcomings of Belknapâs article and clarifies misunderstandings
Prison Research from the Inside: The Role of Convict Autoethnography
A perspective that has often been absent in criminal justice research is that of former prisoners. This article discusses the establishment, in 1997, of âconvict criminology,â a group of scholars producing research informed by their experiences of crime and the criminal justice process; that is, either those who have served time themselves or who have operated alongside prisoners as professionals in custodial settings. It is argued that such scholars face similar dilemmas to others in terms of emotionalism, but suggests that their emotions are of a different nature. While an âinsiderâ perspective cannot lay claim to scientific âobjectivity,â the article argues that the existence of emotion does not invalidate an âinsiderâ criminologistâs views. Rather, the passion engendered by the experience of incarceration can add color, context, and contour to data collection, findings, and analysis and may therefore be regarded as an essential thread in the tapestry of criminological inquiry
Prison as Seen by Convict Criminologists
Most criminologists tend to base their view of prison on ideological assumptions gathered from secondary sources, with at best limited entry to the prison world. They nearly always get it wrong, as they systematically exclude the perspectives and real life experiences of their human subjects. These academic researchers have contributed to poor public policy that promotes the violent repression of prisoners in the USA and other countries. In response, Convict Criminologists are exâconvicts working as criminology and criminal justice professors, along with ânonâconâ associates, that insist that as a means for societies to develop humane, effective, and cost efficient prisons, we must develop ways to incorporate the voice of prisoners in our theorizing about, policy recommendations for, and management of the prison
- âŠ