11 research outputs found
Estimates of apparent survival for 31 species based on 6 or 12 years of data.
<p>Estimates of apparent survival were calculated from capture and recapture data gathered at Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador. Estimates shown are for the most highly supported model. Straight line indicates equal estimates between the two sets of data. Species showing substantial differences between sets: Autinf – <i>Automolus infuscatus</i>; Chipar – <i>Chiroxiphia pareola</i>; Cyacya – <i>Cyanocompsa cyanoides</i>; Forcol – <i>Formicarius colma</i>; Mioole – <i>Mionectes oleagineus</i>; Phamal – <i>Phaethornis malaris</i>; Phiery – <i>Philydor erythrocercum</i>; Pipfil – <i>Pipra filicauda</i>; Dixpip – <i>Dixiphia pipra</i>; Pitalb - <i>Pithys albifrons</i>; Sclcau – <i>Sclerurus caudacutus</i>; Thaard - <i>Thamnomanes ardesiacus</i>; Thacae – <i>Thamnomanes caesius</i>; Turalb – <i>Turdus albicollis</i>; Xenmin – <i>Xenops minutus</i>.</p
Apparent survival rate (<i>φ</i>) estimates (and standard errors) are based on data collected on two 100-ha plots in Ecuador, 2001–2012.
<p>Results are based on the first six years of data (2001–2006; see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0081028#pone.0081028-Blake2" target="_blank">[8]</a>) and for the full 12 years. Competitive models (ΔAIC<sub>c</sub><2.0) are ordered by AICc rankings for the full 12-year results; corresponding results from the reduced data set of 2006 follow that ranking (estimates for some species were not calculated for the reduced data set). Estimates are shown for both the first (<i>φ<sub>1</sub></i>) and subsequent capture periods [<i>φ<sub>2</sub></i>, i.e., TSM models, e.g. <i>φ</i>(2./.)p(.)] for the full data set (2001–2012) but only <i>φ<sub>2</sub></i> for the reduced set (2001–2006 data).</p>a<p>I/R - number of individuals captured/number of recaptures (excluding individuals only captured during the final sample) over the 12-year period.</p>b<p>ΔAIC<sub>c</sub> - differences in AIC<sub>c</sub>.</p>c<p><i>w<sub>i</sub></i> - relative strength (weight) of evidence for selected models.</p>d<p>Model included <i>p</i>(t) rather than <i>p</i>(.).</p
TiputiniPasseriformMalariaMatrix
Association matrix of resident passerine birds and their haemosporidian (Plasmodium and Haemoproteus) parasites in the Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador. Sampling years 2001 - 2010
MEC-16-0567SpecificityIndices_HostTraits
Table 1. Parasite lineages recovered in the Tiputini Biodiversity station, their GenBank ID, sample size, host breadth (number of host species used), specialization category (ND = not determined due to small sample size, Generalist = not significantly restricted distribution on hosts, Specialist = significantly restricted distribution on hosts), mean phylogenetic distance (MPD) and corresponding z-score (DSI), mean phylogenetic distance weighted by frequency (wMPD) and corresponding z-score (wDSI), and non-phylogenetic frequency distribution on hosts (d) and corresponding z-score.
Table 2. Host species included in analyses, their sample size, type of host (harboring at least one specialist or only generalists), abundance, mean mass, apparent survival rate, and GenBank ID for the RAG-1 gene. Abundance estimates are from (Blake 2007), survival rates are from (Blake & Loiselle 2013), and masses are unpublished data from JGB
Pyriglenaleuconotaallsequen
nexus file with all mtDNA ND2 sequences. Please contact the first author for any further details
PyriglenaleuconotaSEQUENCES
Excel file with information about sequences in the file "Pyriglenaleuconota
Bird RAG-1 alignment
Bird RAG-1 alignment file. Outgroup species begin with "out" and are followed by their GenBank ID
Parasite cytb alignment
Parasite cytb alignment file. Outgroup species begin with "O" and are followed by their GenBank ID
GenBank ID numbers
GenBank IDs of associate bird species and parasite lineages used in the phylogenetic specificity indices