sj-pdf-1-nvs-10.1177_08997640231196892 – Supplemental material for Neutral, Non-Disruptive, and Native: Why Do Chinese Nonprofit Scholars Cite English Articles?

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-nvs-10.1177_08997640231196892 for Neutral, Non-Disruptive, and Native: Why Do Chinese Nonprofit Scholars Cite English Articles? by Ji Ma in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly</p

A preliminary study on a Mirror of Japan (Ribenyijian)

Abstract: After the reign of Emperor Jiajing of the Ming Dynasty, as the Japanese pirates’ problem became more and more serious, books devoted to the study of Japan began to be published. Among them, the most important ones are A Brief Survey of Japan (Ri Ben Kao Lue), A Compilation of Japanese Maps (Ri Ben Tu Zuan), A Mirror of Japan (Ri Ben Yi Jian), A Survey of Japan (Ri Ben Kao), A Record of Japanese Customs (Ri Ben Fen Tu Ji), and A Biography of Japanese Pirates in Qiantai (Qian Tai Wo Zhuan). Out of these, A Mirror of Japan is a special one. In addition, there are also special books that depict the general ambiance of Japan, such as A Collection of Coastal Military Maps (Chou Hai Tu Bian), Resistance to Japanese Pirates in Ming Dynasty (Huang Ming Yu Wo Lu), the Compilation of Coastal Defense (Hai Fang Zuan Yao) and the Continuation of Coastal Defense Category in Zhedong and Zhexi Regions (Liang Zhe Hai Fang Lei Kao Xu Bian). Zheng Shungong, the author of the book A Mirror of Japan, visited Japan twice, so many contents in the book are based on his own experience and knowledge. Therefore, the breadth and scope of his research on Japan had gone beyond the similar literature of the Ming Dynasty. Moreover, the Japanese pirates’ record and analysis in the book are of great research value. Before the publication of Huang Zunxian’s Annals of Japan (Ri Ben Tu Zhi), A Mirror of Japan was one of the highest levels of monographs on Japan in ancient China.</div

sj-pdf-1-nvs-10.1177_08997640221146948 – Supplemental material for Consensus Formation in Nonprofit and Philanthropic Studies: Networks, Reputation, and Gender

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-nvs-10.1177_08997640221146948 for Consensus Formation in Nonprofit and Philanthropic Studies: Networks, Reputation, and Gender by Ji Ma and René Bekkers in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly</p

Distribution of publications and universities by year.

Records for 2022 are incomplete because the research database was compiled in early 2022.</p

Description of explanatory and dependent variables.

Description of explanatory and dependent variables.</p

Methods and robustness analysis.

This study theorizes and tests an institutional-logics framework to explain why some universities produce more practice-oriented peer-reviewed journal articles than others, using nonprofit studies as an example. Empirically, knowledge production for practice can be increased by (1) graduate degree programs with an emphasis on nonprofit management, (2) research centers on nonprofit studies, and (3) location in disadvantaged communities; however, (4) status as an R1 or R2 research university substantially decreases the production of practical knowledge. Furthermore, (5) research centers can mediate the influence of community needs on knowledge production, so that universities with nonprofit research centers are more responsive to solving community issues. Theoretically, knowledge production follows the institutional logics of both closed and open systems, and institutions such as research centers that can repackage the culture of open systems to make it acceptable to closed systems are essential mediators.</div

Simplified schema of linked datasets.

PK = Primary Key, used to uniquely identify the records in a table. FK = Foreign Key, used to link records in different tables. NME = Nonprofit Management Education. IPEDS = The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. ACS = American Community Survey. FIPS = Federal Information Processing Standards (County Codes). EID = IDs for uniquely identifying publications. UNITID = IDs for uniquely identifying higher education institutions. INST. HAS ART. = Institution has articles.</p

Predicting knowledge production for practice.

This study theorizes and tests an institutional-logics framework to explain why some universities produce more practice-oriented peer-reviewed journal articles than others, using nonprofit studies as an example. Empirically, knowledge production for practice can be increased by (1) graduate degree programs with an emphasis on nonprofit management, (2) research centers on nonprofit studies, and (3) location in disadvantaged communities; however, (4) status as an R1 or R2 research university substantially decreases the production of practical knowledge. Furthermore, (5) research centers can mediate the influence of community needs on knowledge production, so that universities with nonprofit research centers are more responsive to solving community issues. Theoretically, knowledge production follows the institutional logics of both closed and open systems, and institutions such as research centers that can repackage the culture of open systems to make it acceptable to closed systems are essential mediators.</div

Producing practical knowledge: An institutional-logics framework.

Producing practical knowledge: An institutional-logics framework.</p

Topic keywords and the number of corresponding articles.

Topic keywords and the number of corresponding articles.</p