14 research outputs found
Who invented vaccination?
Edward Jenner, whose ‘Inquiry’ (1798)1 was the first published report of vaccination against smallpox, is widely seen as the inventor of vaccination. However, other individuals could lay claim to this title, notably his contemporaries, Benjamin Jesty and John Fewster. Jesty, a Dorset farmer, performed vaccinations in 1774, 22 years before Jenner’s first vaccination in 1796. Fewster, an apothecary-surgeon who knew Jenner personally, is also reported to have performed the procedure several years before Jenner. However, neither Jesty nor Fewster published or publicised their work and both were recognised retrospectively, notably by critics of Jenner. This article compares the contributions of these three putative ‘inventors’ of vaccination.peer-reviewe
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes.
RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570
Intensive care management of severe hypernatraemia in the context of group A streptococcal septicaemia
Elucidating the Essential Role of the A14 Phosphoprotein in Vaccinia Virus Morphogenesis: Construction and Characterization of a Tetracycline-Inducible Recombinant
We have previously reported the construction and characterization of vindH1, an inducible recombinant in which expression of the vaccinia virus H1 phosphatase is regulated experimentally by IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) (35). In the absence of H1 expression, the transcriptional competence and infectivity of nascent virions are severely compromised. We have sought to identify H1 substrates by characterizing proteins that are hyperphosphorylated in H1-deficient virions. Here, we demonstrate that the A14 protein, a component of the virion membrane, is indeed an H1 phosphatase substrate in vivo and in vitro. A14 is hyperphosphorylated on serine residues in the absence of H1 expression. To enable a genetic analysis of A14's function during the viral life cycle, we have adopted the regulatory components of the tetracycline (TET) operon and created new reagents for the construction of TET-inducible vaccinia virus recombinants. In the context of a virus expressing the TET repressor (tetR), insertion of the TET operator between the transcriptional and translational start sites of a late viral gene enables its expression to be tightly regulated by TET. We constructed a TET-inducible recombinant for the A14 gene, vindA14. In the absence of TET, vindA14 fails to form plaques and the 24-h yield of infectious progeny is reduced by 3 orders of magnitude. The infection arrests early during viral morphogenesis, with the accumulation of large numbers of vesicles and the appearance of “empty” crescents that appear to adhere only loosely to virosomes. This phenotype corresponds closely to that observed for an IPTG-inducible A14 recombinant whose construction and characterization were reported while our work was ongoing (47). The consistency in the phenotypes seen for the IPTG- and TET-inducible recombinants confirms the efficacy of the TET-inducible system and reinforces the value of having a second, independent system available for generating inducible recombinants
In-Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Prosthetic Heart Valves
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices developed for end-stage heart failure or as a bridge-to-transplant include total artificial hearts (TAH) and ventricular assist devices (VAD) and utilize prosthetic heart valves (PHV) or rotary impellers to control blood recirculation [1]. These devices are currently not optimized to reduce the incidence of pathological flow patterns that cause elevated stresses leading to platelet activation and thrombosis. Although the latter is partially mitigated by lifelong anticoagulation therapy, it dramatically increases the risk of uncontrolled bleeding. For instance thromboembolic stroke-related complications (∼2%) were relatively less with the TAH-t compared to uncontrolled bleeding due to anticoagulation use (∼20%) [2]. Platelet activation should therefore be quantified and optimized based on patient-specific cardiac outputs in device prototypes before clinical use.</jats:p
