5 research outputs found

    Comparison of 5 and 10 year outcomes for usual care vs. genomics-based care decisions using individual level probabilities.

    No full text
    <p>Results are presented for the Mayo Clinic and TJU cohorts. McNemar’s test was used to test for significant differences between usual care and GC-based treatment outcomes for each cohort.</p><p>BCR = biochemical recurrence; MET = metastasis; GC = genomic classifier.</p><p>Comparison of 5 and 10 year outcomes for usual care vs. genomics-based care decisions using individual level probabilities.</p

    Descriptions of patient characteristics for each cohort.

    No full text
    <p>SD = standard deviation; ECE = extracapsular extension; SVI = seminal vesicle invasion; PSM = positive surgical margin; LNI = lymph node involvement; GC = genomic classifier; TJU = Thomas Jefferson University; Ref. = reference</p><p>*Note, three patients were excluded from this original cohort due to unknown ECE status; Overall cohort metastatic risk, range of risks for cohort, and proportion classified as high risk according to GC was based on the reweighted cohort of 808 patients from the original cohort of 216 patients.</p><p>Descriptions of patient characteristics for each cohort.</p

    Comparison of 5 and 10 year outcomes for population level probabilities vs. individual level probabilities using usual care treatment.

    No full text
    <p>Results are presented for the Mayo Clinic and TJU cohorts.</p><p>Comparison of 5 and 10 year outcomes for population level probabilities vs. individual level probabilities using usual care treatment.</p
    corecore