6 research outputs found

    The survival outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer based on the site of metastases and the impact of molecular markers and site of primary cancer on metastatic pattern

    No full text
    <p><b>Background:</b> Pattern of spread in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is variable and may reflect different biology in subsets of patients. This is a retrospective study to explore the outcome of patients with mCRC based on their site of metastasis at diagnosis and to explore the association between tumor characteristics [KRAS/RAS, BRAF, mismatch repair (MMR) status, site of primary] and the site of metastasis.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> Patients from two Australian databases were divided into six groups based on site of metastasis at time of diagnosis of metastatic disease; lung-only, liver-only, lymph node-only or any patients with brain, bone or peritoneal metastases. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of each cohort compared with the rest of the population. A Mantel–Haenszel chi-squared test used to explore the association between site of metastasis and selected tumor characteristics.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Five thousand nine hundred and sixty-seven patients were included. In a univariate analysis, median OS was significantly higher when metastases were limited to lung or liver and shorter for those with brain, bone or peritoneal metastases (<i>p</i> < .001) in both datasets. BRAF mutation was strongly associated with peritoneal metastases (relative risk = 1.8, <i>p</i> < .001) with lower incidence of lung (RR = 0.3, <i>p</i> = .004) and liver (RR = 0.7, <i>p</i> = .005) limited metastases. Lung-only metastases were more frequent with KRAS/RAS mutation (RR = 1.4, <i>p</i> = .007). Left colon tumors were associated with bone (RR = 1.6, <i>p</i> < .001) and lung-only metastases (RR = 2.3, <i>p</i> = .001) while peritoneal spread was less frequent compared with right colon tumors (RR = 0.6, <i>p</i> < .001). Rectal cancer was associated with brain, bone and lung metastases (RR = 1.7; <i>p</i> = .002, 1.7; <i>p</i> < .001, 2.0; <i>p</i> < .001). Liver-only metastases were less frequent in deficient MMR tumors (RR = 0.7, <i>p</i> = .01).</p> <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Survival duration with mCRC is related to the site of metastases with lung limited disease showing a more favorable survival outcome compared to other single metastatic site disease. The BRAF mutation and primary rectal cancer were associated with poor prognostic metastatic sites.</p

    Liquid biopsies for residual disease and recurrence

    No full text
    Detection of minimal residual disease in patients with cancer, who are in complete remission with no cancer cells detectable, has the potential to improve recurrence-free survival through treatment selection. Studies analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with solid tumors suggest the potential to accurately predict and detect relapse, enabling treatment strategies that may improve clinical outcomes. Over the past decade, assays for ctDNA detection in plasma samples have steadily increased in sensitivity and specificity. These are applied for the detection of residual disease after treatment and for earlier detection of recurrence. Novel clinical trials are now assessing how assays for “residual disease and recurrence” (RDR) may influence current treatment paradigms and potentially change the landscape of risk classification for cancer recurrence. In this review, we appraise the progress of RDR detection using ctDNA and consider the emerging role of liquid biopsy in the monitoring and management of solid tumors
    corecore