14 research outputs found
Highly Selective Olefin Trimerization Catalysis by a Borane-Activated Titanium Trimethyl Complex
Reaction
of a trimethyl titanium complex, (FI)ÂTiMe<sub>3</sub> (FI
= phenoxy-imine), with 1 equiv of BÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub> gives [(FI)ÂTiMe<sub>2</sub>]Â[MeBÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub>], an effective precatalyst for the selective trimerization
of ethylene. Mechanistic studies indicate that catalyst initiation
involves generation of an active Ti<sup>II</sup> species by olefin
insertion into a Ti–Me bond, followed by β-H elimination
and reductive elimination of methane, and that initiation is slow
relative to trimerization. (FI)ÂTiMe<sub>3</sub>/BÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub> also leads to a competent catalyst for the oligomerization
of α-olefins, displaying high selectivity for trimers (>95%),
approximately 85% of which are one regioisomer. This catalyst system
thus shows promise for selectively converting light α-olefins
into transportation fuels and lubricants
Highly Selective Olefin Trimerization Catalysis by a Borane-Activated Titanium Trimethyl Complex
Reaction
of a trimethyl titanium complex, (FI)ÂTiMe<sub>3</sub> (FI
= phenoxy-imine), with 1 equiv of BÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub> gives [(FI)ÂTiMe<sub>2</sub>]Â[MeBÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub>], an effective precatalyst for the selective trimerization
of ethylene. Mechanistic studies indicate that catalyst initiation
involves generation of an active Ti<sup>II</sup> species by olefin
insertion into a Ti–Me bond, followed by β-H elimination
and reductive elimination of methane, and that initiation is slow
relative to trimerization. (FI)ÂTiMe<sub>3</sub>/BÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub> also leads to a competent catalyst for the oligomerization
of α-olefins, displaying high selectivity for trimers (>95%),
approximately 85% of which are one regioisomer. This catalyst system
thus shows promise for selectively converting light α-olefins
into transportation fuels and lubricants
Scope and Mechanism of Homogeneous Tantalum/Iridium Tandem Catalytic Alkane/Alkene Upgrading using Sacrificial Hydrogen Acceptors
An
in-depth investigation of a dual homogeneous catalyst system
for the coupling of alkanes and alkenes based on an early-/late-transition-metal
pairing is reported. The system is composed of Cp*TaCl<sub>2</sub>(alkene) for alkene dimerization and pincer-iridium hydrides for
alkane/alkene transfer hydrogenation. Because there is no kinetically
relevant interaction between the two catalysts, the tandem mechanism
can be entirely described using the two independent catalytic cycles.
The alkene dimerization mechanism is characterized by an entropically
disfavored pre-equilibrium between Cp*TaCl<sub>2</sub>(1-hexene) +
1-hexene and Cp*TaCl<sub>2</sub>(metallacyclopentane) (Δ<i>H</i>° = −22(2) kcal/mol; Δ<i>S</i>° = −16(2) eu); thus, the overall rate of alkene dimerization
is positive order in 1-hexene (exhibiting saturation kinetics), and
increases only modestly with temperature. In contrast, the rate of
1-hexene/<i>n</i>-heptane transfer hydrogenation catalyzed
by <i>t</i>-BuÂ[PCP]ÂIrH<sub>4</sub> is inverse order in 1-hexene
and increases substantially with temperature. Styrene has been investigated
as an alternate sacrificial hydrogen acceptor. Styrene dimerization
catalyzed by Cp*TaCl<sub>2</sub>(alkene) is considerably slower than
1-hexene dimerization. The conversion of styrene/heptane mixtures
by the Ta/Ir tandem system leads to three product types: styrene dimers,
coupling of styrene and heptane, and heptene dimers (from heptane).
Through careful control of reaction conditions, the production of
heptene dimers can be favored, with up to 58% overall yield of heptane-derived
products and cooperative TONs of up to 12 and 10 for Ta and Ir catalysts,
respectively. There is only slight inhibition of Ir-catalyzed styrene/<i>n</i>-heptane transfer hydrogenation under the tandem catalysis
conditions
Guanidine-Functionalized Rhenium Cyclopentadienyl Carbonyl Complexes: Synthesis and Cooperative Activation of H–H and O–H Bonds
Catalytic reactions utilizing carbon
monoxide as a substrate are
numerous, and they typically involve selective functionalization of
a metal-bound CO. We have developed group 7 carbonyl complexes where
secondary coordination sphere, Lewis acidic functionalities can assist
in the activation of substrate molecules, mainly in the context of
syngas conversion. This work describes a new class of cyclopentadienyl
(Cp) rhenium carbonyl compounds of the type [ReÂ(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>4</sub>DMEG)Â(CO)<sub>3<i>–n</i></sub>(NO)<sub><i>n</i></sub>]<sup><i>n</i></sup> (DMEG = dimethylethyleneguanidine, <i>n</i> = 0, 1), where
a tethered guanidine base is appended to the Cp ring to participate
in cooperative substrate activation with the electrophilic carbonyl.
A reliable synthetic route for these complexes is presented, with
crystallographic characterization of the free-base and protonated
forms for both the carbonyl and mixed carbonyl-nitrosyl complexes.
The latter are employed as platforms to study heterolytic H–H
and O–H bond cleavage reactions that result in nucleophilic
CO functionalization. The corresponding formyl complex is prepared
by hydride transfer, and by measuring its hydricity (Δ<i><i>G</i>°</i><sub>H–</sub>) and p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> of the protonated base, the free energy of
H<sub>2</sub> cleavage is found to be +3.3(6) kcal/mol. The activation
of methanol to form methoxycarbonyl complexes is found to be more
favorable, with Δ<i><i>G</i>°</i> ≈
0 for the intramolecular addition of methanol to the guanidine-appended
carbonyl complex. A detailed thermodynamic study is described for
both the intramolecular methanol activation reaction and related intermolecular
reactions with external bases. The results highlight some tangible
thermodynamic benefits of tethering the base in the secondary coordination
sphere
Diverse C–C Bond-Forming Reactions of Bis(carbene)platinum(II) Complexes
The platinum(0) complex PtÂ(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> catalyzes
coupling of the carbene ligands of (CO)<sub>5</sub>CrÂ{CÂ(OMe)Â(<i>p-</i>MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)} (<b>1</b>). The
stable bisÂ(carbene)ÂplatinumÂ(II) complexes Cl<sub>2</sub>PtÂ{CÂ(OMe)Â(Me)}<sub>2</sub> (<b>3</b>), Br<sub>2</sub>PtÂ{CÂ(OMe)Â(Me)}<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>), and Cl<sub>2</sub>PtÂ{CÂ(O<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr)Â(Me)}<sub>2</sub> (<b>5</b>) can be induced to undergo
C–C coupling reactions by several means. Reduction of <b>3</b>–<b>5</b> to platinum(0) with cobaltocene results
in formation of internal olefins, (<i>E/Z</i>)-2,3-dimethoxybut-2-ene
(<b>6</b>) or (<i>E/Z</i>)-2,3-diisopropoxybut-2-ene
(<b>7</b>). Reaction of <b>3</b>–<b>5</b> with PPh<sub>3</sub> yields terminal olefins, 2,3-dimethoxybut-1-ene
(<b>13</b>) or 2,3-diisopropoxybut-1-ene (<b>15</b>),
along with Cl<sub>2</sub>PtÂ(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>12</b>) or Br<sub>2</sub>PtÂ(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>14</b>). In contrast, addition of pyridine to <b>3</b>–<b>5</b> does not effect C–C coupling; instead, the acyl complexes <i>cis</i>-ClÂ(py)ÂPtÂ(COMe)Â{CÂ(OMe)Â(Me)} (<b>8</b>), <i>cis</i>-BrÂ(py)ÂPtÂ(COMe)Â{CÂ(OMe)Â(Me)} (<b>9</b>), and <i>cis</i>-ClÂ(py)ÂPtÂ(COMe)Â{CÂ(O<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr)Â(Me)}
(<b>10</b>) are obtained, with concomitant formation of alkyl
halide. Possible mechanistic pathways for C–C bond formation
are discussed, as well as explanations for the different reactivities
observed for pyridine and PPh<sub>3</sub>
Mechanistic Studies of Ethylene and α-Olefin Co-Oligomerization Catalyzed by Chromium–PNP Complexes
To explore the possibility of producing a narrow distribution
of
mid- to long-chain hydrocarbons from ethylene as a chemical feedstock,
co-oligomerization of ethylene and linear α-olefins (LAOs) was
investigated, using a previously reported chromium complex, [CrCl<sub>3</sub>(PNP<sup>OMe</sup>)] (<b>1</b>, where PNP<sup>OMe</sup> = <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-bisÂ(bisÂ(<i>o</i>-methoxyphenyl)Âphosphino)Âmethylamine). Activation of <b>1</b> by treatment with modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO) in the presence
of ethylene and 1-hexene afforded mostly C<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>10</sub> alkene products. The identities of the C<sub>10</sub> isomers, assigned
by detailed gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric analyses, strongly
support a mechanism that involves five- and seven-membered metallacyclic
intermediates comprised of ethylene and LAO units. Using 1-heptene
as a mechanistic probe, it was established that 1-hexene formation
from ethylene is competitive with formation of ethylene/LAO cotrimers
and that cotrimers derived from one ethylene and two LAO molecules
are also generated. Complex <b>1/</b>MMAO is also capable of
converting 1-hexene to C<sub>12</sub> dimers and C<sub>18</sub> trimers,
albeit with poor efficiency. The mechanistic implications of these
studies are discussed and compared to previous reports of olefin cotrimerization
Spectral Studies of a Cr(PNP)–MAO System for Selective Ethylene Trimerization Catalysis: Searching for the Active Species
Variable temperature spectroscopic,
kinetic, and chemical studies
were performed on a soluble Cr<sup>III</sup>Cl<sub>3</sub>(PNP) (PNP
= bisÂ(diarylphosphino)Âalkylamine) ethylene trimerization precatalyst
to map out its methylaluminoxane (MAO) activation sequence. These
studies indicate that treatment of Cr<sup>III</sup>Cl<sub>3</sub>(PNP)
with MAO leads first to replacement of chlorides with alkyl groups,
followed by alkyl abstraction, and then reduction to lower–valent
species. Reactivity studies demonstrate that the majority of the chromium
species detected are not catalytically active
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Rhenium(I)–Formyl C–H Bond Formation via Base-Assisted Heterolytic H<sub>2</sub> Cleavage in the Secondary Coordination Sphere
Conversion of synthesis gas, a mixture
of carbon monoxide and hydrogen,
into value-added C<sub><i>n</i>≥2</sub> products
requires both C–H and C–C bond-forming events. Our group
has developed a series of molecular complexes, based on group 7 (manganese
and rhenium) carbonyl complexes, to interrogate the elementary steps
involved in the homogeneous hydrogenative reductive coupling of CO.
Here, we explore a new mode of H<sub>2</sub> activation, in which
strong bases in the secondary coordination sphere are positioned to
assist in the heterolytic cleavage of H<sub>2</sub> to form a formyl
C–H bond at a rhenium-bound carbonyl. A series of cationic
rheniumÂ(I) complexes of the type [Re<sup>I</sup>(P∼B:-κ<sub>1</sub>-P)Â(CO)<sub>5</sub>]<sup><i>n</i></sup> (<i>n</i> = 0, +1), where P∼B: is a phosphine ligand with
a tethered strong base, are prepared and characterized; measurement
of their protonation equilibria demonstrates a pronounced attenuation
of the basicity upon coordination. Formyl complexes supported by these
ligands can be prepared in good yield by hydride delivery to the parent
pentacarbonyl complexes, and several of the free-base formyl complexes
can be protonated, generating observable [Re<sup>I</sup>(P∼BH-κ<sub>1</sub>-P)Â(CHO)Â(CO)<sub>4</sub>]<sup><i>n</i></sup> complexes.
Intramolecular hydrogen bonding is evident for one of the complexes,
providing additional stabilization to the protonated formyl complex.
By measuring both the hydricity of the formyl, Δ<i>G</i>°<sub>H–</sub>, and its p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub>, the overall free energy of H<sub>2</sub> cleavage is calculated
from an appropriate cycle and found to be thermodynamically uphill
in all cases (in the best case by only about 8 kcal/mol), although
significantly dependent upon the properties of the supporting ligand
Lewis Acid Promoted Titanium Alkylidene Formation: Off-Cycle Intermediates Relevant to Olefin Trimerization Catalysis
Two
new precatalysts for ethylene and α-olefin trimerization,
(FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Me and (FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>CMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Me (FI = phenoxy-imine), have
been synthesized and structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction.
(FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Me can be activated
with 1 equiv of BÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub> at room
temperature to give the solvent-separated ion pair [(FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]Â[MeBÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub>], which catalytically trimerizes ethylene or 1-pentene
to produce 1-hexene or C<sub>15</sub> olefins, respectively. The neopentyl
analogue (FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>CMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Me is unstable
toward activation with BÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub> at
room temperature, giving no discernible diamagnetic titanium complexes,
but at −30 °C the following can be observed by NMR spectroscopy:
(i) formation of the bis-neopentyl cation [(FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>CMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup>, (ii) α-elimination of neopentane
to give the neopentylidene complex [(FI)ÂTiÂ(î—»CHCMe<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>+</sup>, and (iii) subsequent conversion to the imido-olefin
complex [(MeOAr<sub>2</sub>Nî—»)ÂTiÂ(OArHCî—»CHCMe<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> via an intramolecular metathesis reaction with the
imine fragment of the (FI) ligand. If the reaction is carried out
at low temperature in the presence of ethylene, catalytic production
of 1-hexene is observed, in addition to the titanacyclobutane complex
[(FI)ÂTiÂ(CHÂ(CMe<sub>3</sub>)ÂCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>)]<sup>+</sup>, resulting from addition of ethylene to the neopentylidene [(FI)ÂTiÂ(î—»CHCMe<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>+</sup>. None of the complexes observed spectroscopically
subsequent to [(FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>CMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup> is an intermediate or precursor for ethylene trimerization,
but notwithstanding these off-cycle pathways, [(FI)ÂTiÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>CMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup> is a precatalyst that undergoes
rapid initiation to generate a catalyst for trimerizing ethylene or
1-pentene
Kinetics and Mechanism of Indene C–H Bond Activation by [(COD)Ir(μ<sub>2</sub>‑OH)]<sub>2</sub>
The hydroxy-bridged dimer [(COD)ÂIrÂ(μ<sub>2</sub>-OH)]<sub>2</sub> (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) cleanly cleaves
C–H bonds
in indene and cyclopentadiene to produce (COD)ÂIrÂ(η<sup>3</sup>-indenyl) and (COD)ÂIrÂ(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>), respectively. The kinetics of the formation of (COD)ÂIrÂ(η<sup>3</sup>-indenyl) are consistent with a mechanism that involves coordination
of indene to [(COD)ÂIrÂ(μ<sub>2</sub>-OH)]<sub>2</sub> followed
by rate-determining C–H activation from the iridium dimer–indene
unit. Transition-state analysis of the Ir and Rh hydroxy dimers indicates
that the C–H activation proceeds through a direct deprotonation
of indene by the M–OH unit rather than a stepwise oxidative
addition/reductive elimination mechanism. The crystal structure of
[(COD)ÂIr]<sub>5</sub>(μ<sub>4</sub>-O)Â(μ<sub>3</sub>-O)Â(μ<sub>2</sub>-OH), a dehydration product of [(COD)ÂIrÂ(μ<sub>2</sub>-OH)]<sub>2</sub>, is presented