3 research outputs found
[(NHC)Cu<sup>I</sup>–ER<sub>3</sub>] Complexes (ER<sub>3</sub> = SiMe<sub>2</sub>Ph, SiPh<sub>3</sub>, SnMe<sub>3</sub>): From Linear, Mononuclear Complexes to Polynuclear Complexes with Ultrashort Cu<sup>I</sup>···Cu<sup>I</sup> Distances
A series
of complexes of the type [(NHC)ÂCu–ER3] (NHC = IDipp,
IMes, ItBu, Me2IMe, and ER3 = SiMe2Ph, SiPh3, SnMe3) and [(NHC)ÂCu–R′]
(NHC = IDipp, Me2IMe and R′ = Ph, CCPh)
was synthesized in good yields by the reaction of the corresponding
[(NHC)ÂCu–OtBu] complex with the respective
silylborane pinB–ER3 (pin = OCMe2CMe2O; ER3 = SiMe2Ph, SiPh3),
the stannylborane ((C2H4)Â(iPrN)2)ÂB–SnMe3, or a boronic acid ester
pinB–R′ (R′ = Ph, CCPh). Solid structures
of all complexes were systematically studied by X-ray diffraction
analysis. The solid state structures of the complexes [(NHC)ÂCu–ER3] show a dependence of the structural motif from the steric
properties of the NHC ligand. The sterically demanding NHC ligands
(IDipp, IMes, ItBu) lead to monomeric, linear complexes
[(NHC)ÂCu–ER3], while with the less demanding Me2IMe ligand, polynuclear, μ-ER3-bridged complexes
with ultrashort Cu···Cu distances are observed. For
the related complexes [(NHC)ÂCu–R′] no analogous complexes
with bridging anionic ligands are realized. Instead, irrespective
of the NHC ligand, linear coordinated copper complexes of different
types are formed. 29Si heteronuclear solution NMR spectroscopic
data on [(NHC)ÂCuI–SiR3] exhibit distinctly
different chemical shifts for the (in the solid state) monomeric and
dimeric complexes suggesting different structure types also in solution.
This agrees well with the observation of a trinuclear complex [(Me2IMe)ÂCu–SnMe3]3 both in the solid
state and in solution. Initial catalytic studies suggest that [(NHC)ÂCu–OtBu] complexes (NHC = ItBu, Me2IMe) are, in addition to the established [(IDipp)ÂCu–OtBu] complex, efficient precatalysts for the silylation
of aldehydes and α,β-unsaturated ketones with pinB–SiMe2Ph
[(NHC)Cu<sup>I</sup>–ER<sub>3</sub>] Complexes (ER<sub>3</sub> = SiMe<sub>2</sub>Ph, SiPh<sub>3</sub>, SnMe<sub>3</sub>): From Linear, Mononuclear Complexes to Polynuclear Complexes with Ultrashort Cu<sup>I</sup>···Cu<sup>I</sup> Distances
A series
of complexes of the type [(NHC)ÂCu–ER<sub>3</sub>] (NHC = IDipp,
IMes, I<i>t</i>Bu, Me<sub>2</sub>IMe, and ER<sub>3</sub> = SiMe<sub>2</sub>Ph, SiPh<sub>3</sub>, SnMe<sub>3</sub>) and [(NHC)ÂCu–R′]
(NHC = IDipp, Me<sub>2</sub>IMe and R′ = Ph, CCPh)
was synthesized in good yields by the reaction of the corresponding
[(NHC)ÂCu–O<i>t</i>Bu] complex with the respective
silylborane pinB–ER<sub>3</sub> (pin = OCMe<sub>2</sub>CMe<sub>2</sub>O; ER<sub>3</sub> = SiMe<sub>2</sub>Ph, SiPh<sub>3</sub>),
the stannylborane ((C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)Â(<i>i</i>PrN)<sub>2</sub>)ÂB–SnMe<sub>3</sub>, or a boronic acid ester
pinB–R′ (R′ = Ph, CCPh). Solid structures
of all complexes were systematically studied by X-ray diffraction
analysis. The solid state structures of the complexes [(NHC)ÂCu–ER<sub>3</sub>] show a dependence of the structural motif from the steric
properties of the NHC ligand. The sterically demanding NHC ligands
(IDipp, IMes, I<i>t</i>Bu) lead to monomeric, linear complexes
[(NHC)ÂCu–ER<sub>3</sub>], while with the less demanding Me<sub>2</sub>IMe ligand, polynuclear, μ-ER<sub>3</sub>-bridged complexes
with ultrashort Cu···Cu distances are observed. For
the related complexes [(NHC)ÂCu–R′] no analogous complexes
with bridging anionic ligands are realized. Instead, irrespective
of the NHC ligand, linear coordinated copper complexes of different
types are formed. <sup>29</sup>Si heteronuclear solution NMR spectroscopic
data on [(NHC)ÂCu<sup>I</sup>–SiR<sub>3</sub>] exhibit distinctly
different chemical shifts for the (in the solid state) monomeric and
dimeric complexes suggesting different structure types also in solution.
This agrees well with the observation of a trinuclear complex [(Me<sub>2</sub>IMe)ÂCu–SnMe<sub>3</sub>]<sub>3</sub> both in the solid
state and in solution. Initial catalytic studies suggest that [(NHC)ÂCu–O<i>t</i>Bu] complexes (NHC = I<i>t</i>Bu, Me<sub>2</sub>IMe) are, in addition to the established [(IDipp)ÂCu–O<i>t</i>Bu] complex, efficient precatalysts for the silylation
of aldehydes and α,β-unsaturated ketones with pinB–SiMe<sub>2</sub>Ph
Cu<sup>I</sup>‑Catalyzed Conjugate Addition of Silyl Boronic Esters: Retracing Catalytic Cycles Using Isolated Copper and Boron Enolate Intermediates
CopperÂ(I)-catalyzed conjugate additions
of silyl boronic esters
to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, ketones, and esters are
synthetically well-established reactions. For the first time central
reactive intermediates as well as the boron enolates as the primary
reaction products are isolated and employed in order to deduce catalytic
cycles on an experimental basis. Employing an NHC Cu<sup>I</sup> complex
as a model catalyst, it is possible to perform efficient catalytic
transformations as well as to isolate and characterize the formed
copper enolate complexes as the key intermediates. It is shown that
for this catalytic system the nature of this enolateî—¸<i>O</i>- or <i>C</i>-enolateî—¸is crucial for the
catalytic process. For α,β-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones
the <i>O</i>-enolate is formed predominantly, while for
α,β-unsaturated esters the <i>C</i>-enolate
is the major product. Catalytic turnover is only facile for copper <i>O</i>-enolates, as they react efficiently with the silyl boronic
ester under (re)Âformation of the catalytically active Cu–Si
species and a thermodynamically favored boric acid ester. Thus, the
formation of copper <i>C</i>-enolates is inhibiting the
catalytic process, and effective turnover is possible only after solvolysis
by an alcohol additive. The individual catalytic processes were retraced
by performing stepwise stoichiometric reactions monitored by in situ
NMR spectroscopy