2 research outputs found

    Advantages of total parathyroidectomy in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism induced by end stage renal disease

    Get PDF
    IntroductionSecondary hyperparathyroidism, as a result of chronic kidney disease could be treated medically or surgically. When pharmacotherapy fails, patients undergo surgery - parathyroidectomy, the curative treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). There are currently 3 accepted surgical techniques, each with supporters or opponents – total parathyroidectomy, subtotal parathyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy with immediate autotransplantation.MethodsIn this paper we described our experience on a series of 160 consecutive patients diagnosed with secondary hyperparathyroidism who underwent surgery, in 27 cases it was totalization of the intervention (patients with previously performed subtotal parathyroidectomy or with supernumerary glands and SHPT recurrence). We routinely perform total parathyroidectomy, the method that we believe offers the best results. ResultsThe group of patients was studied according to demographic criteria, paraclinical balance, clinical symptomatology, pre- and postoperative iPTH (intact parathormone) values, SHPT recurrence, number of reinterventions. In 31 cases we found gland ectopy and in 15 cases we discovered supernumerary parathyroids. A percentage of 96.24% of patients with total parathyroidectomy did not show recurrence.DiscussionsAfter analyzing the obtained results, our conclusion was that total parathyroidectomy is the intervention of choice for patients suffering from secondary hyperparathyroidism when pharmacotherapy fails in order to prevent recurrence of the disease and to correct the metabolic parameters

    Management of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Emergencies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience of a Center of Excellence

    No full text
    The COVID-19 pandemic struck unexpectedly; emergency services and chronic care institutions, including dialysis centers, were overloaded. A significant problem was the care of COVID-positive patients alongside the care of chronically dialyzed patients who presented emergencies. In our hospital, which became a COVID support center for dialysis patients with severe forms of the disease, we had to care for PD patients with dialysis-related emergencies. We present two cases of patients managed on an outpatient basis or 1-day hospitalization who were treated successfully without compromising the quality of the care provided. We used remote monitoring, worked in a multidisciplinary team, and shortened the duration of the patients’ hospitalization (and implicitly the risk of contact). In pandemic conditions, the advantage of PD was the possibility of patient isolation; in the first 6 months of the pandemic, we recorded no deaths in this category of patients. In hemodialysis patients, infection and mortality rates were high. Although we expected an increase in the number of peritoneal dialysis patients in the post-pandemic period, this did not happen. We continue to plead for the popularization of the PD method among patients and doctors, which has proven advantages in pandemic conditions
    corecore