12 research outputs found

    Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol

    Get PDF
    High blood cholesterol is typically considered a feature of wealthy western countries(1,2). However, dietary and behavioural determinants of blood cholesterol are changing rapidly throughout the world(3) and countries are using lipid-lowering medications at varying rates. These changes can have distinct effects on the levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol, which have different effects on human health(4,5). However, the trends of HDL and non-HDL cholesterol levels over time have not been previously reported in a global analysis. Here we pooled 1,127 population-based studies that measured blood lipids in 102.6 million individuals aged 18 years and older to estimate trends from 1980 to 2018 in mean total, non-HDL and HDL cholesterol levels for 200 countries. Globally, there was little change in total or non-HDL cholesterol from 1980 to 2018. This was a net effect of increases in low- and middle-income countries, especially in east and southeast Asia, and decreases in high-income western countries, especially those in northwestern Europe, and in central and eastern Europe. As a result, countries with the highest level of non-HDL cholesterol-which is a marker of cardiovascular riskchanged from those in western Europe such as Belgium, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and Malta in 1980 to those in Asia and the Pacific, such as Tokelau, Malaysia, The Philippines and Thailand. In 2017, high non-HDL cholesterol was responsible for an estimated 3.9 million (95% credible interval 3.7 million-4.2 million) worldwide deaths, half of which occurred in east, southeast and south Asia. The global repositioning of lipid-related risk, with non-optimal cholesterol shifting from a distinct feature of high-income countries in northwestern Europe, north America and Australasia to one that affects countries in east and southeast Asia and Oceania should motivate the use of population-based policies and personal interventions to improve nutrition and enhance access to treatment throughout the world.Peer reviewe

    258Change in population mean BMI accounts for the majority of change in underweight and obesity

    Full text link
    Abstract Background Prevalence of underweight has decreased and that of obesity increased in most countries. A shift of the whole BMI distribution in the population would simultaneously change the mean BMI and the prevalence of underweight and obesity, whereas a change only at the tails would have limited impact on the mean. Methods Generalised linear regression of prevalence of underweight and obesity with mean BMI using worldwide data from 2,765 surveys with objectively measured height and weight on 143.5 million men and women aged 20 to 79 years from 1985 to 2016. Results Trends in the prevalence of underweight and obesity are largely driven by shifts in the distribution of mean BMI, with smaller contributions from changes in the shape of the distribution. There was a smaller than expected change in the decline of underweight in east and southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa and in the rise of obesity in Oceania. Conclusions The worldwide rise in obesity and decline in underweight are largely population phenomena. There is also evidence of excess obesity and persistent underweight beyond the distributional shift in some regions, which may be related to growing social inequalities that restrict access to healthy foods for those at highest risk of poor nutrition. Key messages Rise in obesity and decline of underweight are largely driven by increase in mean BMI. Effective response must include restrictions on unhealthy foods while making healthy options more accessible. </jats:sec

    Characterising the distributions of height and body-mass index and their interrelationship

    No full text
    Height and weight are indicators of healthy versus unhealthy nutrition. Body-mass index (BMI) measures weight gain beyond what is expected from height gain. Having short stature or too little weight for one’s height, represented by low BMI, as well as having excessive weight for one’s height, represented by high BMI, increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. My thesis aimed to provide summary statistics that characterise the distributions of height and BMI and their interrelationship. Data were collated via the NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) network, from population-based studies that had anthropometrics measurements from 1985 to 2019 for a total of 2,896 studies with 187 million participants. Of these, 1,282 surveys provided over 11 million participants aged 20 to 79 years, with 1,021 surveys of over 1.4 million women aged 40-49 years and 815 surveys of over 870,000 men aged 40-49 years. I used a hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate mean, variance and skewness of height and BMI, as well as their correlation coefficient; I also used a regression model to estimate the contribution of the change in mean BMI to the change of prevalence in underweight and obesity. In 2019 versus 1985, mean and variance of both the height and BMI distributions increased in most countries and sexes; skewness of the height distribution remained around zero for both women and men in most countries, while skewness of the BMI distribution, although it was a positive number for both sexes, it decreased in women from most countries and increased in men from all countries. Changes in the prevalence of underweight and total obesity, and to a lesser extent severe obesity, were largely driven by shifts in the distribution of BMI, with smaller contributions from changes in the shape of the distribution. The correlation coefficient between height and BMI did not change significantly from zero for most countries and sexes. Considering that the height gain was not proportional to the BMI increase, segments of the two distributions were affected heterogeneously so policy makers and health practitioners need to tackle the double burden of malnutrition.Open Acces

    Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol

    No full text
    High blood cholesterol is typically considered a feature of wealthy western countries1,2. However, dietary and behavioural determinants of blood cholesterol are changing rapidly throughout the world3 and countries are using lipid-lowering medications at varying rates. These changes can have distinct effects on the levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol, which have different effects on human health4,5. However, the trends of HDL and non-HDL cholesterol levels over time have not been previously reported in a global analysis. Here we pooled 1,127 population-based studies that measured blood lipids in 102.6 million individuals aged 18 years and older to estimate trends from 1980 to 2018 in mean total, non-HDL and HDL cholesterol levels for 200 countries. Globally, there was little change in total or non-HDL cholesterol from 1980 to 2018. This was a net effect of increases in low- and middle-income countries, especially in east and southeast Asia, and decreases in high-income western countries, especially those in northwestern Europe, and in central and eastern Europe. As a result, countries with the highest level of non-HDL cholesterol—which is a marker of cardiovascular risk—changed from those in western Europe such as Belgium, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and Malta in 1980 to those in Asia and the Pacific, such as Tokelau, Malaysia, The Philippines and Thailand. In 2017, high non-HDL cholesterol was responsible for an estimated 3.9 million (95% credible interval 3.7 million–4.2 million) worldwide deaths, half of which occurred in east, southeast and south Asia. The global repositioning of lipid-related risk, with non-optimal cholesterol shifting from a distinct feature of high-income countries in northwestern Europe, north America and Australasia to one that affects countries in east and southeast Asia and Oceania should motivate the use of population-based policies and personal interventions to improve nutrition and enhance access to treatment throughout the world

    Long-term and recent trends in hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in 12 high-income countries: an analysis of 123 nationally representative surveys

    Get PDF
    Background: Antihypertensive medicines are effective in reducing adverse cardiovascular events. Our aim was to compare hypertension awareness, treatment and control, and how they have changed over time, in high-income countries. Methods: We used data on 526,336 participants aged 40-79 years in 123 national health examination surveys from 1976 to 2017 in twelve high-income countries: Australia, Canada, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Spain, the UK, and the USA. We calculated the percent of participants with hypertension – defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or being on pharmacological treatment for hypertension – who were aware of their condition, who were treated, and whose hypertension was controlled (i.e. lower than 140/90 mmHg). Findings: Canada, South Korea, Australia and the UK have the lowest prevalence of hypertension, and Finland the highest. In the 1980s and early 1990s, treatment rates were at most 40% and control rates were below 25% in most countries and age-sex groups. Over time, hypertension awareness and treatment increased and control rate improved in all twelve countries, with South Korea and Germany experiencing the largest improvements. Most of the increase occurred in the 1990s and early-mid 2000s, having plateaued since in most countries. Canada, Germany, South Korea and the USA have the highest rates of awareness, treatment and control, while Finland, Ireland, Japan and Spain the lowest. Even in the best performing countries, treatment coverage was at most 80% and control rates were below 70%. Interpretation: Hypertension awareness, treatment and control have improved substantially in high-income countries since the 1980s and 1990s. However, control rates have plateaued in the past decade, at levels lower than those in high-quality hypertension programmes. There is substantial variation across countries in the rates of hypertension diagnosis, treatment an

    Heterogeneous contributions of change in population distribution of body mass index to change in obesity and underweight

    No full text
    From 1985 to 2016, the prevalence of underweight decreased, and that of obesity and severe obesity increased, in most regions, with significant variation in the magnitude of these changes across regions. We investigated how much change in mean body mass index (BMI) explains changes in the prevalence of underweight, obesity, and severe obesity in different regions using data from 2896 population-based studies with 187 million participants. Changes in the prevalence of underweight and total obesity, and to a lesser extent severe obesity, are largely driven by shifts in the distribution of BMI, with smaller contributions from changes in the shape of the distribution. In East and Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the underweight tail of the BMI distribution was left behind as the distribution shifted. There is a need for policies that address all forms of malnutrition by making healthy foods accessible and affordable, while restricting unhealthy foods through fiscal and regulatory restrictions

    Heterogeneous contributions of change in population distribution of body mass index to change in obesity and underweight

    No full text
    From 1985 to 2016, the prevalence of underweight decreased, and that of obesity and severe obesity increased, in most regions, with significant variation in the magnitude of these changes across regions. We investigated how much change in mean body mass index (BMI) explains changes in the prevalence of underweight, obesity, and severe obesity in different regions using data from 2896 population-based studies with 187 million participants. Changes in the prevalence of underweight and total obesity, and to a lesser extent severe obesity, are largely driven by shifts in the distribution of BMI, with smaller contributions from changes in the shape of the distribution. In East and Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the underweight tail of the BMI distribution was left behind as the distribution shifted. There is a need for policies that address all forms of malnutrition by making healthy foods accessible and affordable, while restricting unhealthy foods through fiscal and regulatory restrictions

    Heterogeneous contributions of change in population distribution of body mass index to change in obesity and underweight

    No full text
    From 1985 to 2016, the prevalence of underweight decreased, and that of obesity and severe obesity increased, in most regions, with significant variation in the magnitude of these changes across regions. We investigated how much change in mean body mass index (BMI) explains changes in the prevalence of underweight, obesity, and severe obesity in different regions using data from 2896 population-based studies with 187 million participants. Changes in the prevalence of underweight and total obesity, and to a lesser extent severe obesity, are largely driven by shifts in the distribution of BMI, with smaller contributions from changes in the shape of the distribution. In East and Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the underweight tail of the BMI distribution was left behind as the distribution shifted. There is a need for policies that address all forms of malnutrition by making healthy foods accessible and affordable, while restricting unhealthy foods through fiscal and regulatory restrictions

    Heterogeneous contributions of change in population distribution of body mass index to change in obesity and underweight

    No full text
    From 1985 to 2016, the prevalence of underweight decreased, and that of obesity and severe obesity increased, in most regions, with significant variation in the magnitude of these changes across regions. We investigated how much change in mean body mass index (BMI) explains changes in the prevalence of underweight, obesity, and severe obesity in different regions using data from 2896 population-based studies with 187 million participants. Changes in the prevalence of underweight and total obesity, and to a lesser extent severe obesity, are largely driven by shifts in the distribution of BMI, with smaller contributions from changes in the shape of the distribution. In East and Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the underweight tail of the BMI distribution was left behind as the distribution shifted. There is a need for policies that address all forms of malnutrition by making healthy foods accessible and affordable, while restricting unhealthy foods through fiscal and regulatory restrictions
    corecore